Linkedin contributions received by HMP

LinkedIn as employer text meeting HMP as a committee ID

LINKEDIN is the grouped employer key as one word. HMP is committee C00495028. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $5,753,000 figure is the intersection. A three-letter committee name is easy to confuse with a Microsoft product, a House member PAC, or a super PAC nickname. The join uses the FEC ID. It does not invent a long title.

Filers who typed LINKED IN, LINKEDIN CORP, MICROSOFT, or a Microsoft subsidiary may sit in other keys if stored that way. LinkedIn became part of Microsoft after acquisition; FEC employer strings can lag. This page stays on LINKEDIN as indexed. Matching that string to HMP does not prove Microsoft directed the 202 gifts.

Two hundred two contributions totaling $5,753,000 is a moderate line count against a $5.75 million cell.

Fifty-nine percent of the LinkedIn grouping

The LINKEDIN grouping shows $9,827,388 in itemized individual money. The HMP cell is $5,753,000, or about 59% of that total. About 41% of LinkedIn-coded receipts went to other committees. Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub — a large minority, not a rounding error.

A 59% share is a slim majority. Slim majorities are still overlaps, not endorsements. Other LinkedIn-coded gifts exist; they are simply not this cell.

202 lines into C00495028

HMP received $5,753,000 from LINKEDIN-coded receipts across 202 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $28,480 per contribution. That mean is arithmetic. The packet does not name donors or split the 202 rows by cycle.

The committee overlay includes other employers. Those rows are not in this join. Independent expenditures by C00495028, if filed, are outside this source note. Microsoft’s connected PAC, if it exists under another ID, is not this $5,753,000.

Tech employer strings and federal awards

LinkedIn and Microsoft appear in federal contracting. Those USAspending obligations are not these campaign gifts. This join does not claim that gifts to HMP funded agency awards, or that awards funded the gifts. A professional-network brand on an FEC form is not a cloud-contract payment.

Correlation between a tech employer string and a three-letter committee is a reporting pattern. Causation of election or procurement outcomes is not in the 202 lines. Expanding HMP from memory would add a fact the packet does not provide.

Where to open LinkedIn and HMP without merging Microsoft

The Linkedin industry page keeps the $9,827,388 grouping and the other committees that received about 41% of it. The HMP committee page keeps C00495028 and any longer registration text that lives there. All industries ranks MICROSOFT and other tech keys separately. All FEC ties lists neighboring cells so this 59% overlap is not mistaken for Microsoft PAC spending or for independent expenditures.

The leftover 41% of $9,827,388 is LINKEDIN-coded money that did not go to HMP — a large minority, not a rounding error. About $28,480 per contribution is $5,753,000 divided by 202. HMP as three letters is the stored name for C00495028. MICROSOFT as an employer key, if indexed, is another row and is not in the 59% share. Acquisition history does not rewrite stored employer text.

Three-letter committee, one-word employer, no Microsoft recode

The citation that keeps HMP from colliding with other three-letter PACs is: $5,753,000 of $9,827,388 grouped to LINKEDIN and received by HMP (C00495028) across 202 itemized contributions, about 59%. The ID is the disambiguator. The committee hub is where any longer registration name lives. Expanding HMP from memory would add a fact the packet does not provide.

Unitemized gifts are omitted. Independent expenditures by C00495028, if filed, are omitted. USAspending cloud or advertising awards that mention LinkedIn or Microsoft are omitted. LINKED IN as two words, if indexed, is another key. The industry hub holds the 41% remainder. All industries is where MICROSOFT and LINKEDIN sit as sibling keys rather than as one recoded total.

Questions

How much did LinkedIn-coded donors give HMP?

FEC.gov aggregates show $5,753,000 in itemized individual contributions grouped to LINKEDIN and received by HMP (C00495028). That join covers 202 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $9,827,388. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of LinkedIn FEC money went to HMP?

About 59% of the $9,827,388 LINKEDIN total is in this join: $5,753,000 to C00495028. About 41% went to other committees. A slim majority describes overlap, not a Microsoft corporate gift.

What does HMP stand for?

This page uses the committee name HMP and ID C00495028 as stored in the packet. It does not expand the acronym. Use the committee hub for C00495028 for the FEC registration and receipt types outside this employer filter.

Does this include Microsoft-coded donors?

Only if the grouped employer text is LINKEDIN. MICROSOFT and other related legal names are other keys if stored separately. This page does not recode the acquisition into one total. Figures are limited to the labeled join.