Mananging Partner donations in the 2014 FEC cycle

A misspelled key in 2014

MANANGING PARTNER plus cycle 2014 equals $1,579,300. The extra n is part of the key. Managing Partner spelled correctly is a different occupation string with its own hub. This join does not correct the typo before aggregating.

Parent hubs: Mananging Partner donations and the 2014 election cycle. All FEC ties keeps the misspelling as its own occupation-year cell so it is not silently merged into the correctly spelled title.

The occupation hub for Mananging Partner lists $5.5 million ($5,475,519) under the exact string MANANGING PARTNER. The 2014 election-cycle hub is a different cut: every occupation that filed in 2014, not only this label. This ties page is the cell where those two filters meet. All occupations and All FEC ties keep sibling joins in the same directory so a reader can move without mixing totals.

Party, committee, and employer breakdowns for Mananging Partner in 2014 are not fields in this packet. Do not infer a partisan split from $1.6 million. The occupation page and the 2014 cycle page are the next clicks for named committees and other cuts.

Why the occupation total is small

$5.5 million ($5,475,519) under MANANGING PARTNER is a small bucket because few forms use this typo. It is not a census of managing partners. The correctly spelled Managing Partner page is a different rollup.

The 2014 cell is 28.8% of that small misspelled bucket. A high share of a typo string is arithmetic on two harvested sums, not a statement about law-firm leadership.

Amended individual contribution reports can move $1,579,300. A later harvest of the same occupation string can move $5,475,519. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Live Mananging Partner donations and the live 2014 election cycle pages are the tables; this prose is a packet snapshot.

One donor, 51 receipts

1 donor produced 51 itemized lines totaling $1,579,300. That is about 51.0 receipts per donor — here, per the one person in the cell. Mean per receipt about $30,967; mean per donor equals the cell total, $1,579,300. With one donor, the mean is that donor’s itemized sum, not a typical gift among partners.

Fifty-one receipts from one donor usually means many committees, many dates, or memo entries — or some mix. This packet does not name the donor or the committees. Sort the live occupation hub by amount for 2014 rows if the public file shows them.

51 is a receipt count. 1 is a distinct-donor count inside this occupation-cycle cell. Neither figure is a headcount of everyone who works in the field named by the string. People who left the occupation blank, used a nearby spelling, or listed a more specific title are not in $1.6 million.

Do not merge the typo with Managing Partner

Cite $1,579,300 as Mananging Partner in 2014, keeping the misspelling in the citation. Cite $5,475,519 as this typo’s occupation total. Adding correctly spelled Managing Partner dollars would mix keys the extract kept separate.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates. All occupations lists both the typo and the correct spelling as separate rows if both exist.

Dividing $1,579,300 by 51 receipts yields about $30,967 per line. Dividing by 1 donors yields about $1,579,300 per person in the cell. Those ratios are arithmetic on two harvested integers. They are not medians, not typical gifts, and not a claim about income.

A one-donor cell is still a public record

This page does not identify the donor. A one-donor occupation-cycle cell is a disclosure shape, not a biography. LobbyVault does not guess whether the extra n was a treasurer typo or a repeated self-description. The public record is the string plus $1.6 million.

No party split, no law-firm ranking, no motive. 51 receipts from 1 donor are the volume facts. Do not treat the misspelling as a second profession.

FEC.gov individual contribution files carry the occupation as the filer typed it. This join does not recode MANANGING PARTNER into a Bureau of Labor Statistics title, a NAICS code, or a medical-board specialty. If a researcher needs those crosswalks, they start from the raw string and do the mapping themselves.

Questions

How much did Mananging Partner filers donate in 2014?

The misspelled occupation string MANANGING PARTNER accounts for $1,579,300 in FEC individual contributions in 2014, from 51 receipts and 1 donor. That cell is 28.8% of $5,475,519 harvested under the same typo. Managing Partner spelled correctly is a different occupation key.

Why is there only one donor?

The extract counted 1 distinct donor in this occupation-cycle cell. That person (or donor key) accounts for 51 receipts totaling $1,579,300. A one-donor file is a disclosure shape. This page does not name the donor. Nearby spellings, including Managing Partner, are counted on other occupation pages.

Should this be merged with Managing Partner?

Not in this extract. FEC.gov stored the occupation as typed, including the extra n. LobbyVault does not autocorrect titles. $1.6 million is only the misspelled key in 2014. Merging would invent a total the harvest did not produce.

What two tables does this page join?

The Mananging Partner occupation hub ($5.5 million for the typo) and the 2014 election cycle. The overlap is $1,579,300 from 51 receipts and 1 donor. All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle cells. All occupations lists both spellings as separate rows if both exist.