Manhattan Construction contributions received by ROONEY FOR CONGRESS

Manhattan Construction meeting Rooney for Congress

MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION is the grouped employer key. ROONEY FOR CONGRESS is committee C00618223. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $3,686,754 figure is the intersection. An 86.9% share of an employer grouping landing at one candidate committee is a concentrated cell. Concentration describes the indexed overlap, not a finding that the contractor directed every gift.

Filers who typed Manhattan Construction Group, a regional office, or CONSTRUCTION as an occupation without this employer string sit in other keys. Manhattan as a New York City donation geography is a different join type. This page stays on MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION as indexed.

Eighty-seven percent of the Manhattan Construction grouping

The MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION grouping shows $4,240,626 in itemized individual money. The Rooney for Congress cell is $3,686,754, or about 86.9% of that total ($3,686,754 ÷ $4,240,626). About 13.1% of Manhattan Construction-coded receipts went to other committees. That leftover is $553,872 ($4,240,626 − $3,686,754). Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub.

An 86.9% share is not proof that every person associated with the contractor gave, or that Rooney for Congress received only this employer’s money. The committee overlay includes other employers. The 86.9% figure applies to this spelling only.

134 contributions and a $27,513 mean

ROONEY FOR CONGRESS received $3,686,754 from MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION-coded receipts across 134 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $27,513 per contribution ($3,686,754 ÷ 134). A 134-line cell with a five-figure mean is denser than a four-line Super PAC stack and sparser than a payroll PAC.

Repeat givers raise the contribution count. The packet does not publish a unique-donor figure. One hundred thirty-four lines is not a headcount of construction employees. Candidate-committee contribution limits are not restated here; the packet supplies the join totals only.

A contractor string is not a federal construction award

Construction contractors appear in USAspending facilities, highway, and military-construction records. Those award dollars are not these candidate-committee gifts. This join does not claim that Rooney for Congress receipts funded federal construction awards, or that awards funded the receipts. FEC and USAspending share a contractor name, not a cash pipeline.

Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Correlation between a construction employer string and a candidate committee is a reporting pattern, not causation of infrastructure-policy outcomes. Manhattan in the employer name is not a New York City geography filter.

Pages that keep the contractor and the campaign apart

The Manhattan Construction industry page keeps the $4,240,626 grouping and the other committees that received the remaining 13.1%. The Rooney for Congress page keeps C00618223. All industries ranks other construction-employer keys. All FEC ties lists neighboring cells so this 86.9% join is not mistaken for independent expenditures or for federal construction totals.

The leftover $553,872 is Manhattan Construction-coded money that did not go to Rooney for Congress. Cite $3,686,754, 134 contributions, C00618223, and the $4,240,626 grouping. Keep both sides named. Do not read Manhattan as a city hub.

How to cite Manhattan Construction × Rooney for Congress

A complete claim names MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION and ROONEY FOR CONGRESS, then $3,686,754, 134 itemized lines, C00618223, and 86.9% of the $4,240,626 grouping, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 134 lines into 134 unique people. Do not treat Manhattan as a New York City donation geography. Do not fold federal construction awards into the cell.

Independent expenditures are omitted. The committee hub is more than these 134 rows. The industry hub is $553,872 larger than this cell. Quote FEC.gov for the overlap only.

Manhattan Construction Group, a regional office spelling, and CONSTRUCTION as an occupation remain other keys if indexed. Manhattan as a New York City donation geography is a different join type and does not contain this $3,686,754. The 86.9% share ($3,686,754 of $4,240,626) leaves $553,872 on other committees. One hundred thirty-four lines at about $27,513 each describe the ROONEY FOR CONGRESS cell (C00618223). Federal construction awards that mention the contractor are USAspending objects. Quote FEC.gov. Keep both the contractor string and the candidate committee in the citation.

C00618223 is the recipient ID. Unitemized gifts stay omitted. The $27,513 mean ($3,686,754 ÷ 134) travels with the 86.9% share of $4,240,626.

Questions

How much did Manhattan Construction-coded donors give Rooney for Congress?

FEC.gov aggregates show $3,686,754 in itemized individual contributions grouped to MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION and received by ROONEY FOR CONGRESS (C00618223). That join covers 134 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $4,240,626. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of Manhattan Construction FEC money went to this committee?

About 86.9% of the $4,240,626 MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION total is in this join: $3,686,754 to C00618223. The leftover $553,872 went to other committees. A high share describes overlap, not a finding that the contractor directed every gift.

Is this New York City campaign-finance data?

No. MANHATTAN CONSTRUCTION is an employer/industry string, not a city geography. This page reports itemized individual receipts with that employer label received by ROONEY FOR CONGRESS (C00618223): $3,686,754 across 134 contributions. City hubs are a different join type.

Do these gifts fund federal construction awards?

No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing a contractor name does not create a funding pipeline. This tie reports only the employer–committee intersection on itemized individual receipts.