How much did Mariposa Energy LLP-coded donors give this committee?

FEC.gov aggregates show $4,000,000 in itemized individual contributions grouped to MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP and received by AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA (C00741348). That join covers 4 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is also $4,000,000. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of Mariposa Energy LLP FEC money went to this committee?

100% of the $4,000,000 MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP total is in this join: $4,000,000 to C00741348. A full share describes overlap of the indexed grouping with one committee, not a finding that the LLP directed every gift.

Is this Mariposa Energy corporate political spending?

No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer text grouped to MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP and whose recipient is C00741348. Corporate treasury activity and independent expenditures are other FEC categories. The join does not merge those documents.

Do these gifts fund federal energy awards?

No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing an energy-project name does not create a funding pipeline. This tie reports only the employer–committee intersection on itemized individual receipts.

← All data ties

Mariposa Energy LLP contributions received by AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA

Donors grouped to MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP sent $4,000,000 in itemized individual contributions to AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA (C00741348), according to FEC.gov aggregates. That join covers 4 contributions and matches the employer grouping’s entire $4,000,000 total. This page is the intersection of one employer/industry string and one recipient committee. It is not a claim that Mariposa Energy LLP wrote treasury checks, and it is not independent-expenditure spending.

Key figures

AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA received $4,000,000 from MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP-coded gifts across 4 contributions.
The MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP grouping totals $4,000,000, so this committee is 100% of that labeled money.
About $1,000,000 per contribution is the mean of 4 itemized lines, not a unique-employee count.
The join does not link these receipts to USAspending awards or to independent expenditures.

Four lines equal to the whole Mariposa Energy LLP grouping

Four itemized contributions totaling $4,000,000 average $1,000,000 per line ($4,000,000 ÷ 4). The MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP grouping is also $4,000,000, so this committee received 100% of the labeled money in the aggregate. A 100% share means the industry hub and this committee cell currently report the same dollar figure for this spelling. It does not mean the firm directed the gifts, and it does not name the four filers.

AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA is committee C00741348. Other committees do not appear in the leftover column because leftover is $0 ($4,000,000 − $4,000,000). If later filings add Mariposa Energy LLP receipts to other committees, the industry hub would move first. This tie reports the join as indexed.

A four-line, eight-figure cell is a sparse Schedule A pattern. Repeat givers would still count as separate contributions. The packet does not publish a unique-donor figure. Four lines is not a headcount of energy-company employees.

Mariposa Energy LLP as employer text

MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP is filer-entered employer text grouped as an industry key. Related spellings—Mariposa Energy without LLP, a parent entity, or a plant-site name—sit in other keys if stored separately. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS utilities sector. Staff who typed ENGINEER or ENERGY without the LLP string are on other hubs.

Energy-sector USAspending awards that mention a similar project name are a different dataset. This join does not claim that AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA receipts funded federal energy awards, or that awards funded the receipts. Shared names across FEC and USAspending are not a cash pipeline.

AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA (C00741348)

C00741348 is disclosed as AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA. This page lists only Mariposa Energy LLP-coded individual receipts to that committee: $4,000,000 across 4 contributions. Other employers giving to the same committee appear on the committee overlay. Adding them here would break the four-line filter.

Independent expenditures by the committee, if any, are a different FEC category. Corporate treasury activity, if any exists on other schedules, is not in these facts. The $4,000,000 figure is itemized individual money with both labels.

What a 100% share still is not

One hundred percent of $4,000,000 is arithmetic on this grouping, not a finding that every person associated with Mariposa Energy gave, or that no other energy employers gave to C00741348. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear.

Cite $4,000,000, 4 contributions, C00741348, and the matching $4,000,000 industry total. Keep both sides named: Mariposa Energy LLP as employer text, AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA as recipient.

Pages that keep the LLP and the committee apart

The Mariposa Energy Llp industry page holds the $4,000,000 grouping. The AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA page holds C00741348 receipts from every employer. All industries ranks other energy-employer keys. All FEC ties lists neighboring employer–committee cells so this 4-line join is not mistaken for independent expenditures or for federal energy-award totals.

Four lines at $1,000,000 each are the operational signature of a sparse, high-dollar cell. Line count is not a headcount of LLP partners. Unique donors are unpublished. One filer repeating four times would still be 4 contributions totaling $4,000,000. Quote FEC.gov. Do not fold USAspending energy awards into the cell.

How to cite Mariposa Energy LLP × Progressive Action USA

A complete claim names MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP and AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA, then $4,000,000, 4 itemized contributions, committee C00741348, and a 100% share of the $4,000,000 employer grouping, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 4 lines into 4 unique people. Do not treat the dollars as corporate treasury spending. Do not treat them as federal energy contracts.

The leftover is $0 on this index. That identity of industry total and committee cell is a reporting snapshot. Researchers who need names behind the 4 lines must leave this prose page for the underlying tables. This tie only publishes the overlap.

The $4,000,000 identity between the MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP grouping and the AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA cell is a snapshot of this index, not a forecast. Four itemized lines at $1,000,000 each can be one household repeating, four people, or some mix; the packet does not say. Energy-project names on USAspending stay outside the join. Independent expenditures by C00741348, if disclosed on other schedules, stay outside $4,000,000. Researchers who quote the cell should carry both names, the committee ID, the four-line count, and the FEC.gov source. A 100% share of $4,000,000 is arithmetic, not a motive finding and not a headcount of LLP partners or plant staff.

Questions

How much did Mariposa Energy LLP-coded donors give this committee?: FEC.gov aggregates show $4,000,000 in itemized individual contributions grouped to MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP and received by AMERICANS FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION USA (C00741348). That join covers 4 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is also $4,000,000. These figures are not independent expenditures.
What share of Mariposa Energy LLP FEC money went to this committee?: 100% of the $4,000,000 MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP total is in this join: $4,000,000 to C00741348. A full share describes overlap of the indexed grouping with one committee, not a finding that the LLP directed every gift.
Is this Mariposa Energy corporate political spending?: No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer text grouped to MARIPOSA ENERGY LLP and whose recipient is C00741348. Corporate treasury activity and independent expenditures are other FEC categories. The join does not merge those documents.
Do these gifts fund federal energy awards?: No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing an energy-project name does not create a funding pipeline. This tie reports only the employer–committee intersection on itemized individual receipts.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.