Donors in Silver Spring, MD to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION

Headline cell $400,000

FEC.gov itemized individual contributions are grouped by donor city and recipient committee. For SILVER SPRING, MD × CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION, the published overlap is $400,000. Cycle splits, donor names, and receipt counts are absent from the packet. Do not invent a headcount from the dollar figure.

CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION is the stored name on C00487470. Repeat gifts, joint fundraising, and conduit memo entries can sit inside a city×committee total without this packet splitting them. Do not invent donor names. The committee title is a recipient label, not a roster of contributors in Silver Spring.

CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) received $400,000 from SILVER SPRING against $66,804,144 (0.60%). A round $400,000 is the published cell. Club for Growth entities on other committee IDs are other pages. Leftover under Silver Spring: $66,404,144.

MD city string SILVER SPRING

The city book $66,804,144 is not a budget. It is a sum of Schedule A lines that stored this city string. PAC addresses, joint-fundraising addresses, and household streets that stored SILVER SPRING follow the same rule.

CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) received $400,000 from SILVER SPRING against $66,804,144 (0.60%). A round $400,000 is the published cell. Club for Growth entities on other committee IDs are other pages. Leftover under Silver Spring: $66,404,144.

Recipient ID C00487470

C00487470 is disclosed as CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made, operating expenditures it paid, or earmark destinations beyond the labeled recipient. $400,000 is itemized individual receipts storing city SILVER SPRING and committee C00487470. Other cities giving to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the city filter.

Committee hubs roll up every city. This join does not. $400,000 is not the committee’s national total. Researchers who need the all-city figure must leave this URL for the CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION hub.

Silver Spring, MD remainder after Club for Growth Action

0.60% of $66,804,144 is $400,000 to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470). That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that residents of Silver Spring, MD as a group preferred this committee. Most of the $66,804,144 city book went to other committees. Even when 0.60% is a visible slice, the slice is still only the C00487470 filter.

The leftover $66,404,144 under the SILVER SPRING city string went to other committees. The Silver Spring, MD hub holds that remainder. The CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION page holds receipts whose city field did not store SILVER SPRING. Do not stack this cell with another city’s gifts to C00487470; each join is its own filter.

Caveats on motive and spending

Unitemized federal gifts sit outside $400,000. Maryland state-office filings sit outside it. Independent expenditures are a different FEC file; the source note on this packet says these aggregates are not independent expenditures. City labels are filer-entered. PAC or joint-fundraising addresses that stored this city string follow the same rule as household streets.

Do not read $400,000 as proof that Silver Spring, MD “funded” CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION as a municipal act, or that the committee spent the money in Maryland. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation. FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Do not add $400,000 to federal spending in Maryland.

Contribution lines can cluster in a few ZIPs or spread across many. This packet does not list those ZIPs or a donor headcount. Open the city hub and the committee hub rather than guessing a postal split from the city string alone. CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) received $400,000 from SILVER SPRING against $66,804,144 (0.60%). A round $400,000 is the published cell. Club for Growth entities on other committee IDs are other pages. Leftover under Silver Spring: $66,404,144.

Keep Silver Spring and Club for Growth Action in one sentence

Internal links go to Silver Spring, MD, CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION, Maryland campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. The city page holds the $66,804,144 book and the committees that received the leftover $66,404,144. The committee page holds C00487470 receipts from every city. All FEC ties collects neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this cell.

Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Silver Spring, MD and CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470). Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $400,000 is the only overlap this extract published. A later amendment wave can move a dollar without this file rewriting itself. Treat the live LobbyVault hub as newer than this packet snapshot.

Cite $400,000, $66,804,144, 0.60%, leftover $66,404,144, and C00487470. Keep both sides named: SILVER SPRING as filer-entered city, CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control.

Questions

What did FEC.gov record from Silver Spring, MD to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing city SILVER SPRING and recipient CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION (C00487470) total $400,000 in this extract. That is the join, not Silver Spring, MD’s all-committee book of $66,804,144. These figures are not independent expenditures. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does LobbyVault recode SILVER SPRING to a Census place?

No. SILVER SPRING is the exact stored city string with state MD. Other spellings, abbreviations, and neighboring places are other keys and are omitted from $400,000. LobbyVault does not recode the field into a Census place. Use the Silver Spring, MD hub for the all-committee book of $66,804,144.

Is 0.60% of Silver Spring, MD money going to CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION?

$400,000 is 0.60% of the $66,804,144 Silver Spring, MD city book. The leftover $66,404,144 went to other committees under the same city string. Quote both dollars and the committee ID C00487470. Do not upgrade 0.60% into a ranking of civic preference.

Is $400,000 independent expenditure spending by CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION?

No. The source note states these aggregates are not independent expenditures. $400,000 is itemized individual receipts storing city SILVER SPRING and committee C00487470. IE files, if any, live elsewhere on FEC.gov.