Mesa Petroleum political contributions from Amarillo, TX

Receipts, donors, and $11,000

Shape first: 3 itemized receipts, 3 harvested donors, $11,000 dollars, all carrying contributor city Amarillo, TX and employer/industry grouping MESA PETROLEUM. Three receipts from three donors: a one-to-one ratio in this extract. Means still are not medians. About $3,667 per receipt and about $3,667 per donor are packet quotients, not typical gifts.

The city backdrop is $36,548,245 on 105,665 lines. $11,000 is under 0.1% of that book ($37 million rounded). FEC.gov is the source. Labels are filer-entered.

Why MESA PETROLEUM is a narrow key

MESA PETROLEUM is exact. MESA, PIONEER, and other producer names are other keys. Not NAICS 211. $11,000 is the Amarillo intersection.

Because the key is exact, a thin share of Amarillo dollars is the expected result, not a finding that the related trade is absent. Other employer strings dominate 105,665 city-field lines. Amarillo is a filer-entered Texas city. Other TX cities are other keys. Texas campaign finance is statewide; $36,548,245 is Amarillo’s city tape.

Use Amarillo, TX when you need every industry in Amarillo. Use Mesa Petroleum when you need this string in every city. Use this ties page when both filters must stay on. Texas campaign finance and All FEC ties complete the set of four links.

Amarillo geography as filed

City is a typed field. LobbyVault does not snap AMARILLO to a Census place, MSA, or commuting zone. A suburb that typed a different city never enters $36,548,245. PAC addresses that typed Amarillo can enter it.

Texas state-office filings are a different statute. Unitemized federal gifts never appear with a published city in this roll-up. Neither stream enters $11,000.

Not a federal-award trail

Do not treat $11,000 as USAspending in Amarillo. Campaign itemizations and federal awards share geography names and little else. This packet publishes no obligation dollars. Mixing the two creates a sentence this extract does not support.

Do not rank Amarillo against other cities from this file alone. Do not rank Mesa Petroleum as a winner inside Amarillo from under 0.1%. Correlation is not causation. Motive is unpublished.

Citation and live tables

Cite FEC.gov: grouping MESA PETROLEUM, city Amarillo, TX, $11,000 on 3 receipts from 3 donors; city book $36,548,245 on 105,665 contributions. Keep both nouns. Employer strings are not NAICS.

Live doors: Amarillo, TX, Mesa Petroleum, Texas campaign finance, All FEC ties. If the overlay disagrees with this snapshot, the newer extract controls. Cycle cuts are other joins. Do not add $11,000 to $36,548,245.

What stays unpublished

This packet does not name the 3 donors, the recipient committees, the party split, or the election cycle. Those fields, if needed, live on the hubs or on FEC.gov itemizations — not as invented integers here.

Nationwide Mesa Petroleum dollars are unpublished in this packet. Guessing them from $11,000 is not a method. Keep the join labeled as a join. Keep the nouns attached: 3 is receipts, 3 is harvested donors, $11,000 is the join, and $36,548,245 is the Amarillo city book on 105,665 lines. Swapping those nouns is a citation error. About $3,667 per receipt and about $3,667 per donor remain packet quotients, not medians and not salaries. MESA PETROLEUM is still not a NAICS code. Amarillo, TX is still a filer-entered city string. FEC.gov remains the originating system for every integer on this page. Researchers who need the unfiltered Amarillo tape should open Amarillo, TX rather than inflating $11,000 into $36,548,245. Researchers who need MESA PETROLEUM in every city should open Mesa Petroleum rather than guessing a nationwide total from this slice. Texas campaign finance answers Texas, a larger geography than Amarillo. All FEC ties lists sibling joins. None of those four destinations converts $11,000 into a USAspending obligation. Unitemized federal gifts and Texas state-office filings remain outside both the join and the city book as built here. A usable footnote names Mesa Petroleum, Amarillo, TX, $11,000, 3 receipts, 3 donors, and the city-wide $36,548,245 on 105,665 contributions. Under 0.1% is $11,000 divided by $36,548,245. Rounding the city total to $37 million does not create a second extract. Do not add $11,000 to $36,548,245; the first number is already inside the second. If a later FEC ingest disagrees with this snapshot, the live hubs and FEC.gov control. This prose is not a third disclosure system.

Questions

How much did Mesa Petroleum donors in Amarillo, TX contribute?

Itemized individual contributions tagged MESA PETROLEUM and Amarillo, TX total $11,000 across 3 receipts from 3 donors on FEC.gov aggregates indexed here. That join is under 0.1% of Amarillo’s $36,548,245 city-wide book. It is not a PAC total. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Is $11,000 the full Amarillo political-money total?

No. Amarillo indexes $36,548,245 across 105,665 itemized contributions. $11,000 is only the Mesa Petroleum employer/occupation slice inside that city. Other strings, unitemized gifts, and state-office filings sit outside the join. Filings remain on FEC.gov.

Does Mesa Petroleum money in Amarillo fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $11,000 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Amarillo. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov. Keep both Mesa Petroleum and Amarillo in the sentence when quoting $11,000.

Does Mesa Petroleum in Amarillo include every related job title?

No. MESA PETROLEUM is the exact stored string, not a NAICS sector. Other employer spellings are other keys and are omitted from $11,000. 3 donors and 3 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list.