Mississippi campaign finance next to federal obligations
Mississippi candidate committees reported $19.2 million to the FEC, with Republican committees holding 72.3%. Federal agencies obligated $154,631,141,306 across 362,644 Mississippi-coded awards. The award-row count is substantial next to a modest receipt book. That contrast is unlike inventories, not a funding path.
Key figures
- Mississippi FEC receipts: $19.2 million from 476 committees.
- Republican committees reported 72.3% of FEC receipts ā not of awards.
- Mississippi USAspending: $154,631,141,306 across 362,644 awards.
- Cite award-row count with its dollar total. Donations do not fund awards here.
Mississippiās award-row count needs its dollar partner
MS joins $19.2 million from 476 committees to $154,631,141,306 from 362,644 awards. Cite 362,644 with $154,631,141,306. A bare row count sounds like a pile of deals the file never defined.
A Jackson contribution does not become a Gulf Coast obligation because both strings say Mississippi. Mississippi campaign finance, Mississippi USAspending, and All FEC ties are the three doors.
Shipyard and disaster-award stories need Mississippi USAspending. They do not inherit 72.3% from the candidate file. 362,644 awards have no party field here. Keep the Republican receipt share on the FEC sentence only, always.
State-office campaigns in Mississippi file under state law and sit outside $19.2 million. Local procurement paid without a federal award sits outside $154,631,141,306. This page names two federal disclosure systems ā FEC.gov candidate receipts and USAspending.gov awards ā and stops. A third system would be a different citation.
Republican-majority receipts on a compact roster
Republican committees reported $13.9 million (72.3%). Democratic committees reported $5.1 million (26.8%). Other filers reported $0.2 million (0.9%). 476 committees include residual filers. Sort Mississippi campaign finance by receipts.
State races file with Mississippiās system, outside $19.2 million. Do not invent a mean receipt. Means hide empty accounts.
The Delta and the Coast share MS. This packet does not split $19.2 million or $154,631,141,306 among them. 476 committees and 362,644 awards stay statewide. A regional chart would be a different extract.
476 is a filing count, not a November ballot census. 362,644 is an action count, not unique vendors. Keep those nouns attached to the integers when citing Mississippi.
Mississippi obligations as an award extract
$154,631,141,306 covers award obligations coded to Mississippi. 362,644 is the action count. Disaster, shipyard, and agriculture stories need agency fields on Mississippi USAspending. They do not inherit 72.3% from the candidate file.
Repeat awards add rows. 362,644 is not unique vendors. Do not compute a mean award.
Quote Mississippi campaign finance for the live FEC roster of 476 committees and $19.2 million in receipts. Quote Mississippi USAspending for $154,631,141,306 and 362,644 awards. All FEC ties keeps MS in a series of geographic joins. None of those pages adds receipts to obligations or assigns FEC party codes to awards.
What the join is not
Not a claim that $19.2 million funded $154,631,141,306. Not a ranking of Mississippi as more or less successful at attracting awards. Not a partisan map of 362,644 awards.
Independent expenditures about Mississippi candidates can be paid from elsewhere. Those dollars sit outside both packet totals.
Mississippiās 476 committees and 362,644 awards answer different questions. Keep $19.2 million on the FEC.gov sentence and $154,631,141,306 on the USAspending.gov sentence even when a headline wants a single number. A single number would mix statutes. This join will not publish one.
Delta and Coast share one code
Those regions share MS. This packet does not split $19.2 million or $154,631,141,306 among them. 476 committees and 362,644 awards stay statewide. A regional narrative is color, not a join field.
Print $0.2 million if you publish 72.3% and 26.8% so the pie still closes on $19.2 million.
Amended candidate reports move $19.2 million. Award restatements move $154,631,141,306. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Mississippi campaign finance and Mississippi USAspending are the live tables; this prose is a packet snapshot for MS.
Mississippi citation
FEC.gov: $19.2 million; 476 committees; Democratic $5.1 million; Republican $13.9 million; other $0.2 million. USAspending.gov: $154,631,141,306; 362,644 awards. Campaign contributions are not federal awards.
Do not rank Mississippi as more influential because $19.2 million sits beside $154,631,141,306. Influence is not a field in this packet. The join is MS geography only.
Questions
- Do Mississippi campaign donations fund Mississippi federal awards?
- No. $19.2 million is FEC candidate receipts from 476 committees. $154,631,141,306 is USAspending obligations from 362,644 awards. A shared MS code is not a payment trail. Filings remain on FEC.gov and USAspending.gov. LobbyVault joins the MS extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.
- How Republican is Mississippiās federal candidate fundraising?
- Republican committees reported $13.9 million, or 72.3% of $19.2 million. Democratic committees reported $5.1 million (26.8%). Other filers reported $0.2 million. Those shares describe 476 committees, not award recipients. LobbyVault joins the MS extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.
- Why does Mississippi show 362,644 awards next to 476 committees?
- 362,644 is a USAspending action count. 476 is an FEC committee count. Unlike inventories. A larger award-row count does not mean $19.2 million created more awards. Pair 362,644 with $154,631,141,306 when you quote it.
- Where are Mississippiās hubs?
- Mississippi campaign finance on LobbyVault, Mississippi USAspending on SpendingVault, All FEC ties for other joins. Later bulk files override this snapshot. Do not add the two dollar totals together. LobbyVault joins the MS extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.
Join of FEC.gov candidate receipts with USAspending.gov state obligations. These are different datasets ā campaign contributions are not federal awards.