Skip to main content
← All data ties

Oil Producer political contributions from Tulsa, OK

Filers who listed Oil Producer and Tulsa, OK on FEC.gov itemized individual contributions reported $29,050 across 33 receipts from 13 donors. Tulsa as a whole indexes $128,640,043 across 270,118 itemized contributions. The Oil Producer slice is under 0.1% of the city dollar total. Those figures share a filer-entered city label; they are not a claim that the grouping runs the city’s politics.

Key figures

  • Oil Producer in Tulsa, OK: $29,050 on 33 receipts from 13 donors.
  • Tulsa city-wide FEC itemized total: $128,640,043 on 270,118 contributions.
  • The Oil Producer slice is under 0.1% of Tulsa dollars — a labeled subset, not the city book.
  • OIL PRODUCER is an exact filer-entered label, not a sector roll-up.
  • City labels are filer-entered. The join is not a federal-award trail.

How Oil Producer meets Tulsa

This page is a join. One dimension is contributor city Tulsa, OK. The other is occupation or industry grouping Oil Producer (stored as OIL PRODUCER). $29,050 is the intersection — dollars on receipts that carry both labels. $128,640,043 is the city bucket before the employer filter, built from 270,118 itemized lines. The harvested donor count inside the intersection is 13 donors, not a census of everyone in Tulsa who ever worked in a related trade.

LobbyVault does not add a third table and does not route these dollars through USAspending. A Form 3 itemization is not a federal award. Open the Tulsa, OK city hub for the unfiltered city book, the Oil Producer industry hub for the grouping outside this city filter, Oklahoma campaign finance for the state roll-up, and All FEC ties for sibling joins. Each of those pages answers a different question. This one answers only the intersection.

33 contributions from 13 donors produced $29,050. Repeat gifts add receipts; 13 donors is the headcount in this extract for the join, not a Census of Oil Producer workers in Tulsa. Arithmetic mean per receipt is about $880; per donor, about $2,235. Those means are division of packet facts, not typical salaries and not medians.

What the Tulsa city book holds

Tulsa indexes $128,640,043 ($129 million rounded) on 270,118 itemized individual contributions. City labels are filer-entered. A suburb that types a different city never enters $128,640,043. Joint-fundraising and committee addresses that happen to list Tulsa can sit in the same bucket as residents. The packet does not publish a unique-donor count for the city as a whole, so this page does not invent one from 270,118.

Oklahoma campaign-finance pages cover the state, which is a larger geography than Tulsa. Do not treat $128,640,043 as the OK state total. Unitemized federal gifts never carry a published city in this roll-up, so they never enter $128,640,043. State-office campaigns in Oklahoma file under state law and sit outside these FEC individual-contribution aggregates. Oklahoma City and Tulsa are separate city keys. Do not add this Tulsa book to the other metro’s extract.

The Oil Producer slice inside Tulsa

Inside Tulsa, receipts tagged Oil Producer total $29,050 on 33 lines from 13 donors. That is under 0.1% of $128,640,043. About $880 per receipt is $29,050 divided by 33. About $2,235 per harvested donor is $29,050 divided by 13. Those ratios describe shape. They are not medians, not typical household gifts, and not salaries.

Oil Producer is an exact stored string. OIL PRODUCER and OIL PROD are different keys on this tape even when they describe similar work. $29,050 counts only OIL PRODUCER in Tulsa. Do not add sibling oil strings together unless a packet published a roll-up. This packet did not.

Repeat gifts, household pairs, and spelling variants of Oil Producer that did not match this key never enter $29,050. Repeat gifts that did match add to 33 without necessarily adding to 13. Keep line count and donor count attached to their nouns when citing Tulsa.

What this join is not

It is not a ranking of Tulsa neighborhoods. It is not a safety comparison. It is not proof that Oil Producer money funded a federal contract, grant, or loan. Campaign contributions and USAspending awards are different disclosure systems even when they mention the same city. This packet has no award dollars, so this page prints none.

It is not Oil Producer nationwide unless the industry hub — a different page — is cited separately, and this packet does not harvest that nationwide integer. It is not a PAC independent-expenditure total. Motive is not a field. Party split is not a field in this packet. Missing fields stay missing.

under 0.1% is $29,050 divided by $128,640,043. Rounding the city total to $129 million does not create a second extract. Use $128,640,043 in a table. Use $129 million only as a headline form of the same integer. Correlation is not causation: two filer-entered fields meeting is not evidence that Oil Producer “controls” Tulsa politics.

How to cite the Tulsa × Oil Producer facts

Citation template: occupation or industry grouping Oil Producer, contributor city Tulsa, OK, $29,050 on 33 itemized individual contributions from 13 donors, against a city-wide $128,640,043 on 270,118 contributions (under 0.1% of city dollars). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

Then send the reader to the live Tulsa, OK hub, the Oil Producer industry page, Oklahoma campaign finance, and All FEC ties. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live hubs control. Do not add $29,050 to $128,640,043; the first number is already inside the second.

Using the Tulsa and Oil Producer hubs together

The Tulsa, OK hub is the unfiltered city index: $128,640,043 on 270,118 lines. The Oil Producer hub is the grouping without this city’s filter; this packet does not print that nationwide integer, so do not guess it from $29,050. Oklahoma campaign finance is the state roll-up, a larger geography than Tulsa. All FEC ties is the inventory of other two-table pages. Use all four links. None of them turns $29,050 into a federal award.

If you need names, open the live city and industry hubs rather than reverse-engineering 13 donors from this snapshot. If you need cycle cuts of Tulsa, those are city-cycle joins, not this file. If you need Oil Producer in a single even-year window, those are industry-cycle joins. This file stays on one city and one employer string: Tulsa and Oil Producer, $29,050, 33 receipts, 13 donors.

Questions

How much did Oil Producer donors in Tulsa contribute?
Itemized individual contributions tagged Oil Producer and Tulsa, OK total $29,050 across 33 receipts from 13 donors on FEC.gov aggregates indexed here. That join is under 0.1% of Tulsa’s $128,640,043 city-wide book. It is not a PAC total. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
Is $29,050 the full Tulsa political-money total?
No. Tulsa indexes $128,640,043 across 270,118 itemized contributions. $29,050 is only the Oil Producer employer/occupation slice inside that city. Other strings, unitemized gifts, and state-office filings sit outside the join. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
Does Oil Producer money in Tulsa fund federal spending there?
No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $29,050 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Tulsa. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov.
Where are the Tulsa and Oil Producer live tables?
Use the Tulsa, OK city hub, the Oil Producer industry hub, Oklahoma campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Original itemizations remain on FEC.gov. This guide quotes $29,050, 33 receipts, 13 donors, and $128,640,043.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping. City labels are filer-entered.