Tulsa, OK political money — 2012 cycle

2012 receipts from Tulsa, OK donors

The join keeps donor city Tulsa in Oklahoma and election cycle 2012. The match is $339,172 across 289 itemized contribution rows. The city side of the table, covering every cycle in the aggregate, is $128,640,043. 2012 therefore accounts for 0.3% of Tulsa, OK itemized individual dollars in these facts. The remaining $128,300,871 (99.7%) was itemized in other cycles under the same city label.

This is not a restatement of Tulsa, OK. That hub mixes 2012 with every other even-year window filed under TULSA. It is also not a restatement of the 2012 election cycle hub, which mixes Tulsa, OK with every other donor city in the United States. The 289 rows and $339,172 exist only where both filters are true. Correlation is not causation: a city code plus a cycle year does not prove why someone gave, whom they supported, or whether the recipient was local.

FEC individual contribution files record the contributor's city as entered on the itemized receipt. Spellings, abbreviations, and suburb-versus-city choices can split a metro across multiple city pages. Tulsa, OK here is the string that survived aggregation as TULSA in OK. 2012 is a presidential FEC cycle: a two-year window that includes a presidential general election. This page does not split the $339,172 by office, party, or candidate. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and election cycle.

The city hub still mixes other cycles

The city aggregate for Tulsa, OK is $128,640,043 in itemized individual contributions. That figure is the running total for this city label across cycles, not a single-year census and not a count of unique residents. It includes the $339,172 from 2012 and the $128,300,871 from every other cycle in the same city file. Oklahoma campaign-finance pages still mix Tulsa with every other city in Oklahoma.

The stored city sits in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, Broken Arrow, and Owasso are not rolled into TULSA. State OK stays on the citation so Tulsa is not merged with a same-named string in another state. A large city total does not mean 2012 was large, and a small city total does not mean 2012 was small. For Tulsa, OK, the city stack is $128,640,043 while this cycle is $339,172 (0.3%). Use the city hub to see Tulsa, OK without a year filter, and use this tie page when the question is specifically Tulsa in 2012. Donor city is not the same as recipient city: committees that received these gifts can be anywhere in the FEC system.

How a presidential cycle is coded at the FEC

The 2012 election cycle is a two-year FEC reporting window labeled by its even year. Inside that window, Tulsa, OK donors itemized $339,172 on 289 contribution records. Dividing dollars by rows gives a mean of about $1,174 per itemized gift. That mean is an arithmetic average of rows, not a typical donor and not a median. A few large receipts can lift the mean while most rows sit far below it. This page does not publish a median or a unique-donor count.

The national 2012 hub still includes every other city. State pages for Oklahoma still include every other cycle. Only this join isolates Tulsa × 2012. Unitemized contributions below the FEC itemization threshold are omitted. Independent expenditures, party coordinated spends, and committee-to-committee transfers are other tables. 289 itemized rows is a thicker file than many suburb joins, still a receipt count rather than a unique-person census. Repeat givers and office addresses sit in the same 289-line stack. Adjacent pages for Tulsa, OK, 2012 election cycle, and Oklahoma campaign finance keep those broader cuts; this URL is the intersection only.

A modest cut of the Tulsa stack

0.3% of $128,640,043 is a modest slice. Most of the Tulsa, OK aggregate — $128,300,871 — sits in other cycles. Put another way, about 0.3% of Tulsa, OK's itemized individual dollars in this aggregate were filed in 2012, and about 99.7% were not. Those percentages are $339,172 divided by $128,640,043 and $128,300,871 divided by $128,640,043. They are not shares of state totals, national cycle totals, or eligible voters.

Dollar share (0.3%) and row volume (289 itemized gifts) are separate facts. A modest slice of citywide dollars can sit next to a thicker contribution file than many suburb joins; those labels describe this pair, not other cities. This packet does not include a citywide row count across all cycles, so a row-share percentage is not computed. Do not treat 0.3% as Tulsa's share of the 2012 national cycle, which is a different denominator and is not in these facts.

Mean gift size is not a typical donor

289 itemized contributions totaling $339,172 is the operational definition of this page. The FEC file can list the same household on multiple dates, to multiple committees, and under spelling variants of TULSA. Unique-person counts are not in the packet and are not invented here. Neither is a ranking of Tulsa versus other Oklahoma cities: this join has one geography and one cycle.

Mean gift size of about $1,174 uses only the two numbers in the join: $339,172 and 289 rows. It is a trivial ratio, not a finding about wealth, turnout, or ideology. Employer and occupation strings on those receipts are other joins. This city-cycle page does not break the $339,172 out by occupation, industry, or recipient committee. Unitemized gifts and Oklahoma state-office filings sit outside $339,172.

City of the contributor, not the recipient

This page does not rank Tulsa against other cities, does not call 2012 a wave, and does not treat itemized giving as a proxy for public opinion in Oklahoma. Two columns matched. The city of the contributor is not the city of the campaign. A OK address on an individual receipt does not mean the money supported a Oklahoma candidate. A candidate who lives in Tulsa can raise money from other cities; those gifts are not this join.

City labels are filer-entered. A donor who typed TULSA is counted; a donor who typed a neighborhood or a nearby suburb such as Oklahoma City is not recoded into Tulsa. Treat 289 as lines that stored this string in 2012. See Tulsa, OK, the 2012 election cycle, Oklahoma campaign finance, and All FEC ties for the adjacent tables. Figures are FEC itemized individual contribution aggregates. They are not federal spending awards and they do not fund USAspending totals. If the live hub disagrees, the newer FEC extract controls.

Questions

How much did Tulsa, OK donors give in the 2012 election cycle?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing Tulsa, OK total $339,172 in the 2012 cycle, across 289 contribution records. The same city label totals $128,640,043 across all cycles in this aggregate, so 2012 is 0.3% of that city stack. Figures are from FEC.gov city-by-cycle aggregates.

Is the Tulsa, OK city total only for 2012?

No. The city aggregate of $128,640,043 covers every cycle in the table for TULSA. The 2012 filter is $339,172 from 289 itemized gifts. Other cycles hold $128,300,871. Use the city hub for the all-cycle total and this tie page for the 2012 slice.

Did Tulsa, OK 2012 donations stay in Oklahoma?

Not necessarily. Donor city is Tulsa, OK; recipients can be committees anywhere that file with the FEC. This join does not allocate the $339,172 by office, state of the committee, or party. A OK city code is an address field on the individual receipt, not a map of Oklahoma races.

How many Tulsa, OK contributions were itemized in 2012?

289 itemized contribution records sum to $339,172. That count is rows, not unique donors. The arithmetic mean is about $1,174 per row. Unitemized gifts below the FEC threshold and independent expenditures are not included. Citywide unique-donor counts are not in these facts.