Oklahoma campaign finance next to federal obligations

Oklahoma as a two-extract state code

OK joins $29.3 million from 639 committees to $172,714,552,032 from 368,371 awards. A Tulsa contribution does not become an Oklahoma City obligation because both rows say Oklahoma.

368,371 is a larger action count than several states with nearby obligation totals. Pair the count with $172,714,552,032. Oklahoma campaign finance, Oklahoma USAspending, and All FEC ties are the three hrefs.

Tribal award stories belong on Oklahoma USAspending when those recipient types appear. They do not belong in a sentence that treats $29.3 million as the funding source of $172,714,552,032. Keep the two sentences separate.

State-office campaigns in Oklahoma file under state law and sit outside $29.3 million. Local procurement paid without a federal award sits outside $172,714,552,032. This page names two federal disclosure systems — FEC.gov candidate receipts and USAspending.gov awards — and stops. A third system would be a different citation.

A Republican-heavy FEC book

Republican committees reported $25.5 million (86.8%). Democratic committees reported $3.8 million (13.0%). Other filers reported $0.0 million (0.1%). Copying 86.8 percent onto $172,714,552,032 would assign party to awards this file does not party-code.

639 committees include residual filers. Sort Oklahoma campaign finance by receipts. State races file with Oklahoma’s system, outside $29.3 million.

Energy folklore is not a packet dollar share. Open Oklahoma USAspending for agency fields. Keep 86.8% Republican receipts on the FEC sentence only. Do not paint awards with that percentage.

639 is a filing count, not a November ballot census. 368,371 is an action count, not unique vendors. Keep those nouns attached to the integers when citing Oklahoma.

Oklahoma obligations on USAspending.gov

$172,714,552,032 covers award obligations coded to Oklahoma. 368,371 is the action count. Energy, aviation, and tribal stories need agency and recipient fields on Oklahoma USAspending. They do not inherit 86.8% from the candidate file.

Tribal governments may appear among 368,371 rows when the instrument is a federal award. They are not the 639 candidate committees.

Quote Oklahoma campaign finance for the live FEC roster of 639 committees and $29.3 million in receipts. Quote Oklahoma USAspending for $172,714,552,032 and 368,371 awards. All FEC ties keeps OK in a series of geographic joins. None of those pages adds receipts to obligations or assigns FEC party codes to awards.

What not to claim

That Republican-leaning receipts produced Republican-leaning contracts. That $29.3 million is small because agencies obligated $172,714,552,032 instead. The systems do not trade off.

Independent expenditures about Oklahoma candidates can be paid from elsewhere. Those dollars sit outside both packet totals.

Oklahoma’s 639 committees and 368,371 awards answer different questions. Keep $29.3 million on the FEC.gov sentence and $172,714,552,032 on the USAspending.gov sentence even when a headline wants a single number. A single number would mix statutes. This join will not publish one.

Two metros, one statewide roll-up

Oklahoma City and Tulsa share OK with the rest of the state. This packet does not split $29.3 million or $172,714,552,032 among them. 639 committees and 368,371 awards stay statewide.

Print $0.0 million if you publish 86.8% and 13.0% so the pie still closes on $29.3 million. Then print obligations in a new sentence.

Amended candidate reports move $29.3 million. Award restatements move $172,714,552,032. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Oklahoma campaign finance and Oklahoma USAspending are the live tables; this prose is a packet snapshot for OK.

Oklahoma citation

FEC.gov: $29.3 million; 639 committees; Democratic $3.8 million; Republican $25.5 million; other $0.0 million. USAspending.gov: $172,714,552,032; 368,371 awards. Campaign contributions are not federal awards.

Do not rank Oklahoma as more influential because $29.3 million sits beside $172,714,552,032. Influence is not a field in this packet. The join is OK geography only.

Questions

Does Oklahoma Republican fundraising control federal awards in the state?

No. Republican committees reported $25.5 million of $29.3 million in FEC receipts. USAspending obligations of $172,714,552,032 across 368,371 awards have no party field in this packet. Receipt shares are not award shares. LobbyVault joins the OK extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.

How much have Oklahoma federal candidates raised?

FEC aggregates show $29.3 million across 639 committees: Republican $25.5 million (86.8%), Democratic $3.8 million (13.0%), other $0.0 million. Use Oklahoma campaign finance for the live roster. LobbyVault joins the OK extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.

What is Oklahoma’s USAspending total?

USAspending.gov records $172,714,552,032 in obligations and 368,371 awards coded to Oklahoma. That extract is not FEC operating expenditure and is not funded by $29.3 million on this page. LobbyVault joins the OK extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.

Where are Oklahoma’s hubs?

Oklahoma campaign finance on LobbyVault and Oklahoma USAspending on SpendingVault. All FEC ties lists other state joins. Later bulk files override this snapshot if they disagree. LobbyVault joins the OK extracts only. FEC.gov and USAspending.gov remain the originating systems.