Pacific Holding Corp political contributions from Beverly Hills, CA

What this Pacific Holding Corp × Beverly Hills, CA join is

This page is a join. One dimension is contributor city Beverly Hills, CA. The other is employer or industry grouping Pacific Holding Corp (stored as PACIFIC HOLDING CORP). $13,000 is the intersection — dollars on receipts that carry both labels. $243,943,527 is the city bucket before the employer filter, built from 325,245 itemized lines. The harvested donor count inside the intersection is 2 donors, not a census of everyone in Beverly Hills, CA who ever worked under a related name.

LobbyVault does not add a third table and does not route these dollars through USAspending. A Form 3 itemization is not a federal award. Open the Beverly Hills, CA city hub for the unfiltered city book, the Pacific Holding Corp industry hub for the grouping outside this city filter, California campaign finance for the state roll-up, and All FEC ties for sibling joins. Each of those pages answers a different question. This one answers only the intersection.

Two donors on nine receipts: a small headcount with repeated itemizations. About $1,444 per receipt is $13,000 divided by 9. About $6,500 per harvested donor is $13,000 divided by 2. Those ratios describe shape. They are not medians and not typical salaries.

What the Beverly Hills, CA city book holds

Beverly Hills, CA indexes $243,943,527 ($243.9 million) on 325,245 itemized individual contributions. Beverly Hills is a Los Angeles County, California city string. Los Angeles and West Hollywood are other keys. Joint-fundraising and committee addresses that happen to list BEVERLY HILLS can sit in the same bucket as residents. The packet does not publish a unique-donor count for the city as a whole, so this page does not invent one from 325,245.

California campaign-finance pages cover the state, which is a larger geography than Beverly Hills, CA. Do not treat $243,943,527 as the CA state total. Unitemized federal gifts never carry a published city in this roll-up, so they never enter $243,943,527. State-office campaigns in California file under state law and sit outside these FEC individual-contribution aggregates.

The Pacific Holding Corp slice inside Beverly Hills, CA

Inside Beverly Hills, CA, receipts tagged PACIFIC HOLDING CORP total $13,000 on 9 lines from 2 donors. That is under 0.1% of $243,943,527. PACIFIC HOLDING CORP is the exact employer grouping. Parent, subsidiary, or truncated HOLDING labels are other keys. $13,000 counts only rows that stored this string in Beverly Hills, CA.

Repeat gifts, household pairs, and spelling variants of Pacific Holding Corp that did not match this key never enter $13,000. Repeat gifts that did match add to 9 without necessarily adding to 2. Keep line count and donor count attached to their nouns when citing Beverly Hills, CA. This extract does not publish committee names for the overlap.

Limits of the Pacific Holding Corp Beverly Hills, CA snapshot

Unitemized gifts, California state filings, and independent expenditures sit outside $13,000. LobbyVault does not recode BEVERLY HILLS into a Census place. If the live Beverly Hills, CA or Pacific Holding Corp hubs disagree with $13,000, the newer FEC extract controls. PAC or joint-fundraising addresses that stored this pair of strings follow the same exact-match rule as household streets. The packet does not split those address types.

Correlation is not causation. $13,000 does not prove that Pacific Holding Corp directs Beverly Hills, CA elections. Do not mix these FEC dollars with USAspending obligations. This packet has no award counts. All FEC ties is the index of other two-dimension pages. Campaign receipts and federal awards are different statutes even when both mention Beverly Hills, CA.

Using Beverly Hills, CA and Pacific Holding Corp links without mixing statutes

Internal links go to Beverly Hills, CA, Pacific Holding Corp, California campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors (/cities/ca-beverly-hills/, /industries/pacific-holding-corp/, /states/CA/, /ties/). FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. This packet has no obligation dollars. Do not add $13,000 to federal spending in California.

Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Pacific Holding Corp and Beverly Hills, CA. Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. Do not add $13,000 to $243,943,527; the first number is already inside the second.

Citing Pacific Holding Corp and Beverly Hills, CA together

Keep both nouns in one sentence: Pacific Holding Corp and Beverly Hills, CA, $13,000 on 9 receipts from 2 donors, against a city book of $243,943,527 (under 0.1%). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

A later amendment wave can move a dollar without this file rewriting itself. Treat the live LobbyVault hub as newer than this packet snapshot. City-cycle and industry-cycle pages are other joins. This file stays on one employer string and one city string. If you need cycle cuts of Beverly Hills, CA, those are city-cycle joins, not this file.

Questions

How much did Pacific Holding Corp donors in Beverly Hills, CA give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry PACIFIC HOLDING CORP and city BEVERLY HILLS total $13,000 across 9 receipts from 2 donors in this extract. That is the join, not Beverly Hills, CA’s all-industry book of $243.9 million. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does Pacific Holding Corp in Beverly Hills, CA include every related job title?

No. PACIFIC HOLDING CORP is the exact stored string. Other employer spellings are other keys and are omitted from $13,000. 2 donors and 9 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or to NAICS.

What share of Beverly Hills, CA itemized money is Pacific Holding Corp?

$13,000 is under 0.1% of the $243.9 million Beverly Hills, CA city book (325,245 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent. Quote both dollars. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking.

Do Pacific Holding Corp donations in Beverly Hills, CA fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $13,000 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Beverly Hills, CA. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov.