Petroleum Engineer political contributions from Norman, OK

Headline overlap: Petroleum Engineer in Norman, OK

2 donors and 9 receipts are the person and line counts behind $16,000 for PETROLEUM ENGINEER filed from NORMAN, OK. FEC.gov itemized individual contributions supply those integers. The city without the industry filter is $14,932,805 on 59,060 contributions. About 0.1% is the dollar share of that city book.

Means: about $1,778 per receipt, about $8,000 per donor. Those figures come from dividing $16,000 by 9 and by 2. They are not medians and not salaries. A single large receipt can pull the receipt mean up; a single repeat donor can pull the donor mean up.

This is a city-industry ties page at canonical path /ties/petroleum-engineer-donors-in-ok-norman/. It exists because two tables meet. Restating only the Norman hub or only the Petroleum Engineer hub would drop a side.

Norman, OK without the Petroleum Engineer filter

$14,932,805 ($14.9 million) is the all-industry Norman total in this extract. 59,060 is the contribution count on the city field, not a unique-donor census for the city. Addresses that typed NORMAN land here even if the household sits in an adjacent place. Filer-entered labels are not geocoded.

Oklahoma campaign finance covers more than Norman. Do not swap $14,932,805 for a statewide figure. Do not add other OK cities to manufacture a metro. Unitemized federal money and Oklahoma state-office filings are outside $14,932,805.

Employer string PETROLEUM ENGINEER

PETROLEUM ENGINEER is the exact stored value. Petroleum Engineer is the readable form used in titles. Affiliates, prior names, and near-spellings are other keys and sit outside $16,000. Blank employer and placeholder junk labels are other keys as well when they are not this string.

Nationwide Petroleum Engineer activity lives on the industry hub. This page publishes only the Norman slice: $16,000, 9 contributions, 2 donors. Do not infer a national total from the slice.

Norman, OK can appear in news copy, Census tables, and USAspending maps. Those appearances do not change this FEC join. $16,000 is still itemized individual contributions storing PETROLEUM ENGINEER and NORMAN. $14,932,805 is still the all-industry itemized book for that city field. Mixing statutes is the failure mode this page exists to prevent.

Caveats on statutes and motive

FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. $16,000 does not become a contract, grant, or loan because Norman appears in both systems. This packet contains no obligation dollars. Independent expenditures are a different FEC file and are not folded into $16,000.

Motive is not disclosed on Schedule A as a field this packet harvested. Party and committee breakdowns are not in the packet. Correlation is not causation. 2 donors is a headcount for the join, not a finding that Petroleum Engineer directs Norman elections.

Internal links are not optional decoration. Norman, OK documents the city dimension. Petroleum Engineer documents the industry dimension. Oklahoma campaign finance documents Oklahoma. All FEC ties documents that this file is one of many two-table pages. A citation that omits the city or omits Petroleum Engineer has left the join.

Four links that keep Petroleum Engineer and Norman distinct

Norman, OK holds $14,932,805. Petroleum Engineer holds the grouping across cities. Oklahoma campaign finance holds Oklahoma. All FEC ties holds other joins. Follow all four hrefs. None of them is a substitute for quoting $16,000 with both nouns.

If live pages disagree with $16,000, 9, or 2, trust the newer FEC extract. This file is not a parallel filing system.

Citation line

occupation/employer grouping PETROLEUM ENGINEER; city Norman, OK; $16,000; 9 itemized individual contributions; 2 donors; city book $14,932,805 on 59,060 contributions; share about 0.1%. Source: FEC.gov. City labels are filer-entered.

Keep cycle questions on city-cycle or industry-cycle pages. Keep this file on one city and one stored employer string. Do not add $16,000 to $14,932,805.

If 2 is 1, that is still a count, not a name. If 9 is larger than 2, that is still repeat itemization, not a second extract. If about 0.1% is under 0.1%, that is still exact-string math, not proof the trade is absent from Norman. Read the integers as published.

Questions

How many Petroleum Engineer donors in Norman appear in this extract?

2 donors produced $16,000 on 9 itemized FEC individual contributions storing PETROLEUM ENGINEER and NORMAN, OK. That headcount is not employment in Norman and not a roster of names. Repeat gifts can raise receipts without raising donors. Source: FEC.gov.

What is Norman, OK's itemized contribution total?

$14,932,805 across 59,060 city-field contributions in this extract. That all-industry book is larger than the Petroleum Engineer join of $16,000. About 0.1% of city dollars used this exact string. Unitemized gifts are outside the city book.

Can I treat about $1,778 as a typical Petroleum Engineer gift in Norman?

No. about $1,778 is $16,000 divided by 9 receipts. about $8,000 is $16,000 divided by 2 donors. Those are arithmetic means, not medians and not typical household gifts. A few large lines can pull the mean.

Do these Norman donations pay for federal contracts?

No. $16,000 is FEC individual contributions, not USAspending obligations. Different statutes. This packet prints no award dollars. Mentioning Norman in both systems does not merge the tables.