PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP political money — 2010 cycle
$997,364 in itemized individual contributions is the 2010-cycle join for the employer grouping PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. FEC.gov aggregates count 1,706 contributions from 842 donors. The same employer string totals $8,306,870 across every cycle in this table, so the cell is about 12.0% of the lifetime bucket — filer-entered workplace text meeting a two-year window, not a PwC PAC and not an accounting NAICS total.
Key figures
- PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP × 2010 is $997,364 in itemized individual contributions.
- The cell includes 1,706 contributions from 842 donors.
- 2010 is about 12.0% of the grouping’s $8,306,870 all-cycle total.
- The label is filer-entered form text, not a PwC PAC and not an accounting NAICS total.
- FEC gifts and federal award files remain separate datasets.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as stored text, 2010 as cycle
Employer groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and 2010 — sum to $997,364. 1,706 itemized contributions and 842 unique donors produced it. The total is not a corporate treasury gift and is not the company’s PAC. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables.
Neither the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is an employer string, not a partnership census and not the firm’s PAC. 842 donors and 1,706 lines in 2010 matched that employer text. PWC, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, PwC, and ACCOUNTANT or CPA occupation strings sit in other keys. This page is the stored string PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP.
LobbyVault keeps this two-key page so a reader can open PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2010 without treating the industry hub as a cycle total or the 2010 cycle hub as an employer total. The overlay at the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2010 path holds the itemized rows for this cell. This prose publishes the packet snapshot: $997,364, 1,706 contributions, 842 donors, and 12.0% of $8,306,870.
12.0% of the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP roll
The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $8,306,870. The 2010 slice of $997,364 is about 12.0% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 88.0% ($7,309,506). Treating 2010 as the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP FEC story would ignore that remainder.
Treat $8,306,870 as the denominator for the 12.0% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $8,306,870.
A 12.0% cell can sit next to larger or smaller even-year windows on the same PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP hub. This packet does not publish those other cycle dollars, so they are not cited here. Open PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to drop the year filter. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter.
1,706 contributions from 842 donors
Dividing $997,364 by 1,706 contributions yields about $585 per itemized gift. Dividing by 842 donors yields about $1,185 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 2.0. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split.
842 unique donors are contributor identities, not a headcount of employees, licensees, or members. Retirees and household members who reuse a workplace or title can appear. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count faster than the donor count. The overlay for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2010 holds the rows.
1,706 is a receipt count, not a unique-person census beyond the 842 donor figure already in the packet. A person who gave twice is two lines inside the 1,706. Unitemized gifts never appear in $997,364.
2010 as the cycle dimension
The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to drop the year.
Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $997,364 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 1,706 contributions, the 842 unique donors, and the 12.0% share of $8,306,870.
2010 is a midterm federal cycle on FEC.gov. That calendar label does not explain $997,364. This packet does not carry party splits, committee names, or occupation mix beyond the stored string PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP. Cite the two packet dollars — $997,364 for the 2010 slice and $8,306,870 for the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP book — and stop before assigning motive.
What the Commission does not verify
Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $997,364. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is not a PwC PAC and not an accounting NAICS total.
Correlation between an employer or occupation string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 842 donors, and 1,706 contributions. PWC, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, PwC, and ACCOUNTANT or CPA occupation strings sit in other keys. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.
Do not read $997,364 as proof that PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP “drove” the 2010 cycle or that 2010 “drove” the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP book. The join is two fields. If the live hubs disagree with $997,364 or 842 donors, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system.
Citing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and 2010 together
Start with $997,364, then PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2010 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2010, $997,364, 1,706 contributions, 842 donors, 12.0% of $8,306,870, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP.
The 12.0% share, the 842-donor count, and the $585 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling occupation word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control.
Questions
- How much did PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP-listed donors give in 2010?
- FEC.gov aggregates show $997,364 in itemized individual contributions for the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 1,706 contributions and 842 donors. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $8,306,870 all-cycle figure.
- What share of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP FEC money is 2010?
- The grouping’s all-cycle total is $8,306,870. The 2010 cell of $997,364 is about 12.0% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 88.0% ($7,309,506) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP hub holds other cycles; the 2010 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.
- Is $997,364 the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP PAC total for 2010?
- No. $997,364 is itemized individual contributions whose employer field grouped to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP in the 2010 cycle. It is not committee disbursements, not independent expenditures, and not a verified employee census. 1,706 contributions came from 842 donors.
- Where is the overlay for the PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2010 join?
- Open PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 2010 for the cycle overlay, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows.
FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.