Skip to main content
← All data ties

Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP and the 2014 FEC cycle

Donors listing Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP reported $1,148,369 in itemized individual contributions during the 2014 federal election cycle, according to FEC.gov aggregates. Those dollars arrived in 1,736 contributions from 895 donors. The figure belongs to this LLP employer string, not to the shorter Price Waterhouse key and not to a partnership PAC. This page joins Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP to 2014 so a high-volume, lower-average cell can be read as an overlap rather than as a merged accounting-industry total. Nearly nine hundred donors at about $662 per gift is a high-volume, low-mean pattern; do not use it as a stand-in for the 163-donor Price Waterhouse cell in the same year. Leave Price Waterhouse and the 2012 LLP cell uncombined with these 895 donors.

Key figures

  • Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP × 2014 is $1,148,369 in itemized individual contributions.
  • The cell includes 1,736 contributions from 895 donors.
  • 2014 is about 13.8% of the grouping’s $8,306,870 all-cycle total.
  • This key is not the Price Waterhouse grouping.
  • Mean gift size is about $662; that is a mean, not a median.

PwC LLP crossed with the 2014 midterm

Employer groupings sit on one axis; cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP and 2014 — sum to $1,148,369. The total is not an official firm disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live elsewhere in the FEC file.

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $8,306,870. The 2014 slice is about 13.8% of that running sum. A midterm window that accounts for roughly one-seventh of the LLP key’s history is a real cell. It is not a license to add Price Waterhouse dollars from a different grouping onto this page.

The LLP string versus the legacy name

Filers type employer text. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP collects the longer legal-style name. People who wrote Price Waterhouse land on that other key, including a 2014 Price Waterhouse join with 163 donors. Mixing 895 donors with 163 would invent a roster neither packet publishes as a single cell.

895 donors and 1,736 contributions describe one of the broader named-firm cells in this batch. Self-reported fields can include retirees and household members. The Commission does not certify that every row is a current partner or staff member.

Treat $8,306,870 as the denominator for the 13.8% share. Neighboring accounting keys keep their own denominators. This page reports only Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP in 2014.

High volume, smaller mean gifts

Dividing $1,148,369 by 1,736 contributions yields about $662 per itemized gift. Dividing by 895 donors yields about $1,283 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 1.9. Those means sit well below concentrated one-donor cells in this slice. They describe many modest itemized receipts, not a handful of large checks, and they are not medians.

Repeat gifts still raise the contribution count faster than the donor count, which is why 1,736 and 895 belong together. The overlay for Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP 2014 is the row view. A 2012 LLP join, if opened, has its own 923-donor facts and must not inherit 2014’s averages. About 1.9 lines per donor among 895 identities is why this LLP midterm looks like many modest receipts rather than a handful of large partnership checks.

2014 without an accounting league table

The 2014 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. It also does not rank LLP strings against KPMG or Price Waterhouse on this page.

Open the 2014 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP to drop the year. All FEC ties lists other relationship pages that keep their own contribution counts.

Limits of the LLP join

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $1,148,369. Federal contracts in USAspending are a different dataset. Sharing an audit-firm name and a calendar year does not fund those awards with these gifts.

Correlation between a partnership employer string and a midterm cycle is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 895 donors, and 1,736 contributions. Audit-client outcomes are not in the table.

Keeping 895 donors on the LLP page

Start with $1,148,369, then Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP 2014 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2014 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Keep Price Waterhouse on its own ties page.

The 13.8% share, the $662 mean gift, and the 895-donor count belong to this intersection. Carry them onto the legacy-name key and they stop being facts from this packet. One thousand seven hundred thirty-six contributions and an 13.8 percent share of $8,306,870 belong to Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP in 2014. The 2012 LLP join has 923 donors and must keep its own averages. Audit-firm names in USAspending files remain a different dataset.

Questions

How much did Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP donors give in 2014?
FEC.gov aggregates show $1,148,369 in itemized individual contributions for the Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP grouping in 2014, across 1,736 contributions and 895 donors. That sum is not a firm PAC total.
Is this the same as Price Waterhouse in 2014?
No. This page is the Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP employer key. Price Waterhouse is a different grouping with its own 2014 cell. Combining them would invent a total neither packet publishes as a join.
What share of the LLP grouping is 2014?
The grouping’s all-cycle total is $8,306,870. The 2014 cell of $1,148,369 is about 13.8% of that figure. Other cycles are not listed here.
Where is the overlay for this join?
Open Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP 2014 for the cycle overlay, Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP for the grouping hub, and the 2014 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.