Property Management × 2010: occupation-cycle join

$250,138 as the Property Management–2010 headline

Property Management in 2010 is $250,138 on 263 itemized lines from 134 people in the unique-donor roll-up. 2010 is a thin slice of Property Management occupation dollars: 4.1% ($250,138 of $6,103,031). The occupation hub is much larger than this one cycle. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates, grouped by self-reported occupation and election cycle, are the source.

263 contributions from 134 donors is moderate repeat itemization inside the cycle filter. Unique-donor count collapses multiple gifts by the same person inside this occupation-cycle pair. It does not verify that those 134 people still used that title after 2010. A function word on a contribution is not a firm’s PAC spending. Company committees stay outside this occupation-cycle filter.

This page is not a restatement of the Property Management hub or of the 2010 cycle hub. The occupation hub is every cycle. The cycle hub is every occupation. The tie is the intersection: $250,138.

Property Management across cycles versus this 2010 slice

Filers who typed property management produced the all-cycle occupation total of $6,103,031. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is a function noun used as occupation, not the person-title PROPERTY MANAGER. Those remain separate keys. The join does not map donors to parcels, HOAs, or management contracts. The occupation is not a landlord license file, a unit-count census, or a merge with PROPERTY MANAGER.

Property Management itemization inside the 2010 FEC window

The 2010 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Property Management. $250,138 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2010. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2008 presidential window and not a 2012 presidential cycle.

263 contributions from 134 donors is moderate repeat itemization inside the cycle filter. About 2.0 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. Mean per receipt about $951; mean per donor about $1,867. Those means are arithmetic on the 2010 cell only. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $250,138. Three numbers define the Property Management × 2010 cell: dollars $250,138, contribution rows 263, unique donors 134. Share of occupation dollars is 4.1% of $6,103,031.

Occupation plus cycle is not causation

Matching Property Management with 2010 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Property Management donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a landlord license file, a unit-count census, or a merge with PROPERTY MANAGER.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is a function noun used as occupation, not the person-title PROPERTY MANAGER. Those remain separate keys. The join does not map donors to parcels, HOAs, or management contracts. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $250,138 funded USAspending obligations. If a reader only needs the occupation, the Property Management donations hub is $6,103,031; the 2010 election cycle hub is the even-year inventory across titles. Do not add those hubs together.

Linked Property Management and 2010 tables

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 occupation total. The 2010 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Property Management. All occupations places PROPERTY MANAGEMENT beside other titles without merging sibling strings (PROPERTY MANAGER, REAL ESTATE, and PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $250,138 is not added to a different year.

Use the occupation hub for all-cycle Property Management dollars ($6,103,031). Use the 2010 cycle hub for the even-year window across titles. Use this tie for the intersection only: $250,138, 263 contributions, 134 donors, 4.1% of occupation dollars. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT spelling and 2010

The occupation key is PROPERTY MANAGEMENT as stored. Nearby spellings (PROPERTY MANAGER, REAL ESTATE, and PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY) are not recoded into this join. 2010 is the cycle key. Those two keys yield $250,138.

If a later FEC extract restates itemized receipts, the Commission filing controls. This snapshot is the occupation-cycle pair Property Management × 2010: 263 contributions, 134 donors, $250,138.

Questions

How much did Property Management-labeled donors give in 2010?

The Property Management grouping’s 2010 cell is $250,138 in itemized individual contributions, from 263 contributions and 134 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $6,103,031 all-cycle occupation total.

Is Property Management the same as Property Manager?

No. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is the noun string. PROPERTY MANAGER is a different occupation page. The 2010 cycle filter on Property Management is $250,138, 263 contributions, and 134 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $6,103,031. Labels are filer-entered on FEC.gov itemized receipts.

What share of Property Management FEC money fell in 2010?

About 4.1%. $250,138 divided by $6,103,031 is the 2010 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 95.9% ($5,852,893) on the occupation hub. See the Property Management occupation hub for other cycles and the 2010 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Property Management 2010 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $250,138 is itemized receipts tagged PROPERTY MANAGEMENT in 2010, not an obligation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.