Property Management and the 2012 election cycle

Two filters: Property Management and 2012

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT plus cycle 2012 equals $714,750. That figure is the harvested sum of itemized individual contributions in which the occupation field matched this string and the two-year federal election cycle was 2012. Property Manager, Real Estate, and Landlord are other keys if those words appear. This join does not recode the label into a real-estate license roster or a REIT 10-K. Other cycle amounts are not fields in this packet except as the occupation total $6,103,031 and the remainder $5,388,281.

Parent hubs: Property Management donations at /occupations/property-management/ and the 2012 election cycle at /election-cycles/2012/. All occupations lists neighboring titles. All FEC ties keeps each occupation-year cell on its own path so a reader can move without mixing $714,750 into another year or another string. Do not add those parent pages into this cell.

Presidential window, occupation string PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

$6,103,031 belongs to the exact string PROPERTY MANAGEMENT across harvested cycles. It is not a real-estate license roster or a REIT 10-K. People who wrote nearby wording — Property Manager, Real Estate, and Landlord — sit in other rows if the characters differ. The 2012 slice is 11.7% of that title bucket.

Amended individual contribution reports can move $714,750. A later harvest of the same occupation string can move $6,103,031. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Live Property Management donations and the live 2012 election cycle pages are the tables; this prose is a packet snapshot. Itemized individual contributions are the only receipt class in this cell.

245 donor keys inside the 2012 cell

245 donors and 580 receipts — about 2.4 lines per donor. Mean per receipt about $1,232; mean per donor about $2,917. Those ratios are arithmetic on two harvested integers. They are not medians, not typical gifts, and not a claim about income. No median is published in this packet.

Neither 245 nor 580 is a census of every property-management worker who donated. Unitemized gifts below the itemization threshold, in-kind goods, and bundled contributions without this occupation string are outside $714,750. Filers who wrote Property Manager, Real Estate, or Landlord sit in other rows.

Unitemized money and other FEC tables

Cite $714,750 as Property Management in 2012. Cite $6,103,031 as this title’s occupation total. Do not add a realty PAC or a landlord-association committee to either figure. Those filings are committee reports. Mixing PAC spending with $714,750 would blend FEC tables. All occupations lists neighboring titles so a searcher can open the other string’s cycle cell rather than rescale 11.7%.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by self-reported occupation and election cycle. This join does not recode PROPERTY MANAGEMENT into a real-estate license roster or a REIT 10-K. If a researcher needs those crosswalks, they start from the raw string. A presidential-year total does not prove the occupation’s motives, and it does not attach these gifts to any federal spending dataset.

A complete Property Management × 2012 claim

A clean footnote names occupation PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, election cycle 2012, $714,750 in itemized individual contributions, 580 receipts, and 245 donors on FEC.gov. Keep the itemized word. Mean dollars remain about $1,232 per line and $2,917 per donor in the cell. If the live Property Management donations overlay has refreshed, quote the overlay. Do not treat 580 as unique workers in the trade.

Repeat the four numbers together: $714,750 in the 2012 cycle, 580 contributions, 245 donors, and 11.7% of $6,103,031. That sentence is the join. Gifts per donor in 2012 average about 2.4. That ratio is 580 divided by 245, not a measure of turnout.

Remainder $5,388,281 outside 2012

Property Manager, Real Estate, and Landlord are neighboring strings, not parents of this cell. Opening those occupation hubs and adding their dollars to $6,103,031 would mix keys. All occupations is the index for those other strings. All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pages, including other years for Property Management when those files exist.

Do not rank Property Management against other occupations from this packet. The packet has one occupation total and one cycle cell. Rankings would require other occupation totals that are not facts here. Stop at $714,750 tagged Property Management in 2012.

Questions

What did PROPERTY MANAGEMENT filers itemize in 2012?

The join records $714,750 in itemized individual contributions for occupation Property Management in the 2012 FEC cycle, from 580 contributions and 245 donors. The occupation’s all-cycle total is $6,103,031, so 2012 is 11.7% of that roll. Figures come from FEC.gov aggregates. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Why is the Property Management 2012 page separate from the occupation hub?

The occupation hub is $6,103,031 across cycles. This page is the 2012 slice: $714,750, 580 contributions, 245 donors. The hub does not replace the join, and the join does not replace the hub. All FEC ties lists other year cells.

What share of Property Management occupation money is the 2012 cycle?

11.7%: $714,750 of $6,103,031. The remaining $5,388,281 sits in other cycles on the occupation hub. That share is $714,750 divided by $6,103,031, not a ranking of civic engagement and not a peak-year list. Other years’ amounts are not in this packet except as that remainder.

Where are the live Property Management and 2012 tables?

Property Management donations carries the $6,103,031 occupation total. The 2012 election cycle hub places Property Management beside other occupation strings that year. All occupations and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the Property Management × 2012 intersection only.