Property Management money in the 2014 FEC cycle

Property Management as occupation, 2014 as the cycle

Two FEC dimensions meet here: occupation PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and the 2014 election cycle. The intersection is $322,218 ($0.32 million), 378 contributions, and 135 donors. 5.3% of Property Management occupation dollars ($6,103,031) fall in 2014.

2014 is an even-year federal cycle labeled 2014 on FEC.gov, a midterm FEC window in itemized receipts. This page does not add later cycles into the 2014 dollars. Property manager as a person-title remains a different occupation page. This join keeps the noun phrase PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. Do not add the 2008 Property Management cell to this 2014 figure. Each cycle is its own join against the same occupation denominator.

The same function noun, a different two-year clock

On the occupation side, $6,103,031 is the Property Management total across cycles. Sibling labels (PROPERTY MANAGER, REAL ESTATE, and LANDLORD) stay on other pages. Property Management is not a CAM-license census, a landlord-permit file, or a real-estate PAC.

All occupations lists other titles without adding them to $6,103,031. The Property Management donations page holds the all-cycle occupation table that $322,218 is a slice of. Dividing $322,218 by 378 receipts yields about $852 per line; dividing by 135 donors yields about $2,387 per person. Those ratios are arithmetic, not medians.

135 donors inside the 2014 midterm window

The 2014 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Property Management. $322,218 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2014. A midterm FEC window. It is not a 2012 presidential window and not a later presidential cycle.

378 itemized lines from 135 unique donors is about 2.8 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $852; mean per donor about $2,387. About 2.8 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $322,218. Under one hundred forty donor keys and a few hundred lines is a thinner function-phrase cell than the 2008 presidential cut.

What Property Management dollars in 2014 are not

Matching Property Management with 2014 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Property Management donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a CAM-license census, a landlord-permit file, or a real-estate PAC.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Property manager as a person-title remains a different occupation page. This join keeps the noun phrase PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $322,218 funded USAspending obligations.

How to cite Property Management × 2014

A complete claim names Property Management and 2014, then $322,218, 378 contributions, 135 donors, and 5.3% of $6,103,031, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 135 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Property Management and 2014—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $852 and mean per donor $2,387 travel with those counts; they do not travel with a licensing board.

Occupation hub, 2014 hub, and the 2008 sibling cell

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 occupation total. The 2014 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Property Management. All occupations places PROPERTY MANAGEMENT beside other titles without merging sibling strings (PROPERTY MANAGER, REAL ESTATE, and LANDLORD). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $322,218 is not added to a different year. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

The occupation hub still holds $5,780,813 (94.7%) outside 2014. Most of the $6,103,031 roll is not this cycle’s cell. Do not add the 2008 Property Management cell to this 2014 figure. Each cycle is its own join against the same occupation denominator. Gifts per donor in 2014 average about 2.8. That ratio is 378 divided by 135, not a measure of turnout. Quote both keys: Property Management and 2014. Quote the dollars: $322,218. Quote the volume: 378 contributions, 135 donors. Quote the source: FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Property Management-labeled donors give in 2014?

The Property Management grouping’s 2014 cell is $322,218 in itemized individual contributions, from 378 contributions and 135 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $6,103,031 all-cycle occupation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Is the 2014 Property Management cell the same as 2008?

No. Both use occupation PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, but 2014 is a different even-year filter with its own dollar, contribution, and donor counts. The 2014 cycle filter on Property Management is $322,218, 378 contributions, and 135 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $6,103,031.

What share of Property Management FEC money fell in 2014?

About 5.3%. $322,218 divided by $6,103,031 is the 2014 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 94.7% ($5,780,813) on the occupation hub. See the Property Management occupation hub for other cycles and the 2014 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Property Management 2014 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $322,218 is itemized receipts tagged PROPERTY MANAGEMENT in 2014, not an obligation total. Cite the 2014 intersection as $322,218 and 378 contributions from 135 donors, not the $6,103,031 occupation total.