Property Management political contributions from California

Property Management and California as a concentrated desk join

Occupation PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and donor state CA produce $2,281,221, 8,625 contributions, and 290 donors. The occupation hub is $6,103,031, 26,160 contributions, and 968 donors. The three shares are 37.4% of dollars, 33.0% of contributions, and 30.0% of donors. Keep all three; quoting only $2,281,221 drops the row and donor keys. California Property Management holds more than a third of occupation dollars on a two-word desk title.

Property Management is a two-word desk title as typed, not a Property Manager recode and not a Real Estate recode. Nearby strings — REAL ESTATE, PROPERTY MANAGER, LANDLORD, and COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE — sit in other occupation hubs when filers used those words. Do not stack those dollar figures onto $2,281,221 or $6,103,031. Tennessee Property Management in this slice is a different state filter on the same occupation string; do not add the two state totals on this California page. Film Producer in California is a different occupation.

Two hundred ninety California donors produced 8,625 contributions, about 29.7 itemized rows per donor in this join, versus about 27.0 rows per donor nationally (26,160 contributions from 968 donors). Mean dollars per donor in this California cell are about $7,866, versus about $6,305 across the occupation. Those ratios are arithmetic on the six packet numbers, not a gift-size ranking of influence.

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT versus Real Estate on the California key

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is filer-entered. The FEC file does not verify a California property-manager license, a named portfolio, or a CAM credential. The national grouping is 968 donors, 26,160 contributions, and $6,103,031.

26,160 contributions from 968 donors shows repeat itemization nationwide. California’s 8,625 contributions from 290 donors is the CA-coded piece. This page does not split those rows by cycle, employer, or recipient committee. It locates how much of the labeled money is also coded to California.

Two hundred ninety California donors on the management label

Two hundred ninety California donors produced 8,625 contributions totaling $2,281,221. Donor state CA is the address on the record, not proof of a California professional license, and not a limit to California candidates. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee.

The California campaign-finance hub includes every occupation coded to CA. This join is only PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. Subtract $2,281,221 from $6,103,031 and $3,821,810 remains coded Property Management in every other state combined (17,535 contributions, 678 donors). That remainder has no row-by-row breakdown here because those states are other ties.

More than a third of occupation dollars in one state

This page does not measure property management output, does not rank firms, and does not claim that Property Management-coded money caused any electoral result. Occupation plus state is a bookkeeping join. Correlation is not causation. Not a California property-manager license extract, not a named-portfolio census, and not a landlord roll.

Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov is the source. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Itemized individual contributions only. Firm names, license numbers, and employer strings are not in these six numbers. Donor state CA is not recipient geography.

California real-estate strings that remain unmerged

A unique-donor count is not a person-level audit. The FEC aggregate can merge similar names or split one person who filed under variants. A contribution count can be many small itemized rows. A dollar total can hide that skew. Keeping $2,281,221, 8,625 contributions, and 290 donors on the same page is the point of the join: quoting only the California dollars, or only the Property Management national total, drops a key.

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 national occupation total. California campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields. REAL ESTATE, PROPERTY MANAGER, LANDLORD, is a different occupation string if a filer used it.

This relationship is not a forecast and not a ranking of influence. Occupation does not cause contributions, and donor state does not cause recipient geography. Public records, two fields, one intersection. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; occupation labels are filer-entered. Tennessee Property Management in this slice is a different state filter on the same occupation string; do not add the two state totals on this California page. Film Producer in California is a different occupation.

Related FEC tables for Property Management and California

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 national occupation total. California campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields.

Questions

How much have Property Management donors in California given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Property Management and state California total $2,281,221, from 8,625 contributions and 290 donors. Nationwide, Property Management-coded receipts are $6,103,031 from 26,160 contributions and 968 donors. California is 37.4% of those dollars.

Does Property Management mean licensed California managers?

Occupation is PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and state is CA. The FEC file does not confirm a license or a named portfolio. Property Manager, Real Estate, and Landlord are other occupation keys. This California join does not recode those strings into PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. Tennessee Property Management is a sibling state filter.

What share of Property Management FEC money is from California?

37.4% of the $6,103,031 occupation total is in this California join ($2,281,221). California also accounts for 33.0% of contributions (8,625 of 26,160) and 30.0% of donors (290 of 968). Those three shares are computed from the packet facts only.

Does this money go to California candidates?

Not necessarily. Donor state is California. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee. This page does not allocate the $2,281,221 by office or by in-state versus out-of-state campaigns. Independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov itemized individual contributions; occupation labels are filer-entered.