Property Management political contributions from Tennessee

Property Management and Tennessee as a desk-title join

Occupation PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and donor state TN produce $128,196, 815 contributions, and 21 donors. The occupation hub is $6,103,031, 26,160 contributions, and 968 donors. Dollar, contribution, and donor shares cluster within a few points (2.1%, 3.1%, 2.2%). Tennessee tracks the national Property Management mix rather than concentrating one of the three measures. Tennessee Property Management contribution share sits above dollar share on a two-word desk title.

Property Management is a two-word desk title as typed, not a Property Manager recode and not a Real Estate recode. Nearby strings — REAL ESTATE, PROPERTY MANAGER, LANDLORD, and COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE — sit in other occupation hubs when filers used those words. Do not stack those dollar figures onto $128,196 or $6,103,031. California Property Management in this slice is a different state filter on the same occupation string; do not add the two state totals on this page.

Twenty-one Tennessee donors produced 815 contributions, about 38.8 itemized rows per donor in this join, versus about 27.0 rows per donor nationally (26,160 contributions from 968 donors). Mean dollars per donor in this Tennessee cell are about $6,105, versus about $6,305 across the occupation. Those ratios are arithmetic on the six packet numbers, not a gift-size ranking of influence.

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT versus Real Estate and Property Manager

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is filer-entered. The FEC file does not verify a Tennessee property-manager license, a named portfolio, or a CAM credential. The national grouping is 968 donors, 26,160 contributions, and $6,103,031.

26,160 contributions from 968 donors shows repeat itemization nationwide. Tennessee’s 815 contributions from 21 donors is the TN-coded piece. This page does not split those rows by cycle, employer, or recipient committee. It locates how much of the labeled money is also coded to Tennessee.

Twenty-one Tennessee donors on the management label

Twenty-one Tennessee donors produced 815 contributions totaling $128,196. Donor state TN is the address on the record, not proof of a Tennessee professional license, and not a limit to Tennessee candidates. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee.

The Tennessee campaign-finance hub includes every occupation coded to TN. This join is only PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. Subtract $128,196 from $6,103,031 and $5,974,835 remains coded Property Management in every other state combined (25,345 contributions, 947 donors). That remainder has no row-by-row breakdown here because those states are other ties.

Contribution share above dollar share on a desk title

This page does not measure property management output, does not rank firms, and does not claim that Property Management-coded money caused any electoral result. Occupation plus state is a bookkeeping join. Correlation is not causation. Not a Tennessee property-manager license extract, not a named-portfolio census, and not a landlord roll.

Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov is the source. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Itemized individual contributions only. Firm names, license numbers, and employer strings are not in these six numbers. Donor state TN is not recipient geography.

Real-estate strings that stay unmerged

A unique-donor count is not a person-level audit. The FEC aggregate can merge similar names or split one person who filed under variants. A contribution count can be many small itemized rows. A dollar total can hide that skew. Keeping $128,196, 815 contributions, and 21 donors on the same page is the point of the join: quoting only the Tennessee dollars, or only the Property Management national total, drops a key.

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 national occupation total. Tennessee campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields. REAL ESTATE, PROPERTY MANAGER, LANDLORD, is a different occupation string if a filer used it.

This relationship is not a forecast and not a ranking of influence. Occupation does not cause contributions, and donor state does not cause recipient geography. Public records, two fields, one intersection. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; occupation labels are filer-entered. California Property Management in this slice is a different state filter on the same occupation string; do not add the two state totals on this page.

Related FEC tables for Property Management and Tennessee

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 national occupation total. Tennessee campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields.

Questions

How much have Property Management donors in Tennessee given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Property Management and state Tennessee total $128,196, from 815 contributions and 21 donors. Nationwide, Property Management-coded receipts are $6,103,031 from 26,160 contributions and 968 donors. Tennessee is 2.1% of those dollars.

Does Property Management mean licensed Tennessee managers?

Occupation is PROPERTY MANAGEMENT and state is TN. The FEC file does not confirm a license or a named portfolio. Property Manager, Real Estate, and Landlord are other occupation keys. This Tennessee join does not recode those strings into PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. California Property Management is a sibling state filter.

What share of Property Management FEC money is from Tennessee?

2.1% of the $6,103,031 occupation total is in this Tennessee join ($128,196). Tennessee also accounts for 3.1% of contributions (815 of 26,160) and 2.2% of donors (21 of 968). Those three shares are computed from the packet facts only.

Does this money go to Tennessee candidates?

Not necessarily. Donor state is Tennessee. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee. This page does not allocate the $128,196 by office or by in-state versus out-of-state campaigns. Independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov itemized individual contributions; occupation labels are filer-entered.