Rancher political contributions from San Antonio, TX

How Rancher meets San Antonio, TX on the FEC tape

$37,450 is the overlap of two filer-entered fields: industry/employer grouping RANCHER and contributor city SAN ANTONIO with state TX. LobbyVault keeps a San Antonio, TX city hub and an Rancher industry hub. Neither hub is this join. The city hub is all industries in San Antonio. The industry hub is that string across cities. This page is only both filters at once.

33 contributions from 22 donors produced $37,450. Repeat gifts add receipts; 22 donors is the headcount in this extract for the join, not a census of everyone in San Antonio tied to that label. Arithmetic mean per receipt is about $1,135; per donor, about $1,702. Those means are division of packet facts, not typical salaries and not medians.

RANCHER is an exact employer/industry string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every person who works in a related job. Other spellings, parent-company names, job titles, and blank employer rows are other keys. $37,450 counts only rows that stored this string in San Antonio, TX. City labels are filer-entered.

The San Antonio side of the Rancher join

San Antonio, TX's all-industry itemized book in this extract is $203.3 million ($203,304,043) across 637,297 contributions. $37,450 is under 0.1% of that city book. A thin share is expected when the industry key is an exact string: most San Antonio receipts use other employer labels. Do not treat under 0.1% as the sector's weight in San Antonio unless the packet listed a sector roll-up. It lists RANCHER only.

The stored city sits in Bexar County, Texas. Alamo Heights are other city strings. Texas campaign-finance pages include other cities. Do not add $37,450 to the state hub; the state extract already contains these rows when the same tape is used. All FEC ties lists other city-industry pages. None of them converts $37,450 into spending by San Antonio candidates.

The Rancher side outside San Antonio

The Rancher industry hub is the same stored string in every city, not a Texas-only table. $37,450 is the San Antonio, TX slice of that string. A donor in another city who stored RANCHER is not in this join. A donor in San Antonio who stored a different employer string is not in this join either. This packet publishes the industry-side dollars for the grouping as $37,450 with 33 contributions and 22 donors.

This packet does not name committees, parties, or cycles for the Rancher × San Antonio, TX overlap. Open the live Rancher page and the live San Antonio, TX page for those breakdowns if the extract publishes them. This prose stays on $37,450, 33 receipts, 22 donors, and the $203.3 million city book. Quote the join with both nouns in the same sentence so a downstream citation cannot drop a side.

What the Rancher × San Antonio dollars omit

Unitemized federal gifts sit outside $37,450. Texas state-office filings sit outside it. Independent expenditures are a different FEC file. City labels and industry labels are both filer-entered; LobbyVault does not recode SAN ANTONIO into a Census place or RANCHER into a standardized occupation. PAC or joint-fundraising addresses that stored this pair of strings follow the same rule as household streets.

Do not read $37,450 as proof that Rancher controls San Antonio politics. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation. If the live hubs disagree with $37,450 or 22 donors, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system. Do not treat the 22-donor cluster as a company-town finding or as a count of everyone who ever worked under a related name.

Using San Antonio, TX and Rancher links without mixing statutes

Internal links go to San Antonio, TX, Rancher, Texas campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Do not add $37,450 to federal spending in Texas. Campaign receipts and federal awards are different statutes even when both mention San Antonio.

Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: Rancher and San Antonio, TX. Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $37,450 across 33 receipts from 22 donors is the only overlap this extract published. Do not add $37,450 to $203,304,043; the first number is already inside the second.

How to cite the San Antonio × Rancher facts

Citation template: employer/industry grouping RANCHER, contributor city San Antonio, TX, $37,450 on 33 itemized individual contributions from 22 donors, against a city-wide $203,304,043 on 637,297 contributions (under 0.1% of city dollars). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

Then send the reader to the live San Antonio, TX hub, the Rancher industry page, Texas campaign finance, and All FEC ties. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live hubs control. If you need cycle cuts of San Antonio, those are city-cycle joins, not this file. If you need Rancher in a single even-year window, those are industry-cycle joins. This file stays on one city and one employer string.

Questions

How much did Rancher donors in San Antonio, TX give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry RANCHER and city SAN ANTONIO total $37,450 across 33 receipts from 22 donors in this extract. That is the join, not San Antonio, TX's all-industry book of $203.3 million. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does Rancher in San Antonio include every related job title?

No. RANCHER is the exact stored string. Other employer spellings are other keys and are omitted from $37,450. 22 donors and 33 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list.

What share of San Antonio, TX itemized money is Rancher?

$37,450 is under 0.1% of the $203.3 million San Antonio, TX city book (637,297 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent. Quote both dollars. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking.

Do Rancher donations in San Antonio fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $37,450 does not become a contract because both rows can mention San Antonio. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov.