Real Estate Development money in the 2012 cycle

Real Estate Development as occupation, 2012 as the cycle

Two FEC fields define the cell: occupation REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT and election cycle 2012. Matching rows sum to $1,082,330, 569 contributions, and 338 donors. REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT in 2012 is an industry phrase, not a person’s job title in the usual sense. Filers still typed it. The occupation hub is $10,060,725 across every cycle in the aggregate. The 2012 cycle hub mixes every other occupation that used that year. Neither hub restates this intersection; this tie page exists because the two dimensions meet.

2012’s dollar share is 10.8% ($1,082,330 of $10,060,725). The remainder, $8,978,395, sits in other cycles on the occupation hub. Hundreds of donor keys and hundreds of lines is a development-phrase cell with a higher mean than many broker strings. Correlation between a job title and a two-year FEC window is a reporting overlap, not causation of an election outcome. Itemized individual receipts are the coverage. Unitemized money never appears in $1,082,330.

The development phrase across every cycle on file

$10,060,725 is the occupation-side denominator. It is not limited to 2012. Real Estate Developer, Real Estate, and Developer are other occupation keys if stored as different strings. Adding those keys to $10,060,725 would be a researcher-built recode, not this table. Occupation labels are filer-entered on itemized individual receipts.

Open Real Estate Development donations for the $10,060,725 roll. Open the 2012 election cycle hub for every occupation in that window. All occupations and All FEC ties place this pair beside other occupation-cycle pages without combining dollar figures.

338 donors and a four-figure mean gift

Dividing $1,082,330 by 569 contributions yields about $1,902 per gift. Dividing by 338 donors yields about $3,202 per donor. Gifts per donor average about 1.7 (569 ÷ 338). Those ratios describe this string in 2012, not payroll at firms that employ people with similar titles.

338 is a donor-key count inside the occupation × cycle aggregate, not a headcount of everyone who held the job in 2012. Repeat itemization, couples filing separately, and people who used the string on some receipts but not others all move the 338 figure. The cycle hub still holds every other occupation’s 2012 receipts beside this cell. Real Estate Developer (person) and Real Estate Development (activity) are distinct strings if stored separately. This join uses the activity phrase.

What Real Estate Development dollars in 2012 are not

A 10.8% share of Real Estate Development-coded dollars from 2012 does not mean the occupation caused those gifts, and it does not mean people with that title funded a policy outcome. Occupation and cycle are reported together. The overlap is descriptive. Independent expenditures, committee-to-committee transfers, and unitemized gifts are out of scope.

Federal awards on USAspending.gov are a different ledger. This join does not claim that 2012 donations funded contracts or grants. Quote $1,082,330 as itemized individual receipts tagged REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT in 2012, source FEC.gov, and stop there.

How to cite Real Estate Development × 2012

A complete claim names Real Estate Development and 2012, then $1,082,330, 569 contributions, 338 donors, and 10.8% of $10,060,725, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 338 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Real Estate Development and 2012—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $1,902 and mean per donor $3,202 travel with those counts; they do not travel with a licensing board.

Occupation hub, 2012 hub, and Developer as a sibling

The occupation hub still holds $8,978,395 outside 2012. Most of the $10,060,725 roll is not this cycle’s cell. This page isolates the overlap for readers who need both the title and the year, not either hub restated. Real Estate Developer, Real Estate, and Developer are other occupation keys if stored as different strings. Those titles are not parents of REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT on this page. Gifts per donor in 2012 average about 1.7. That ratio is 569 divided by 338, not a measure of turnout.

Questions

How much did Real Estate Development-tagged donors give in 2012?

The join records $1,082,330 in itemized individual contributions for occupation Real Estate Development in the 2012 FEC cycle, from 569 contributions and 338 donors. The occupation’s all-cycle total is $10,060,725, so 2012 is 10.8% of that roll. Figures come from FEC.gov aggregates. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Does this count every real estate development who donated in 2012?

No. The 338 donor keys are people whose itemized receipts grouped to REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT in 2012. Filers who used a different title are other occupation rows. FEC.gov does not verify jobs. The cell totals $1,082,330 on 569 lines. Unitemized gifts never appear in this aggregate.

What share of Real Estate Development occupation money is the 2012 cycle?

10.8%: $1,082,330 of $10,060,725. The remaining $8,978,395 sits in other cycles on the occupation hub. That share is $1,082,330 divided by $10,060,725, not a ranking of civic engagement and not a peak-year list. Other years’ amounts are not in this packet except as that remainder.

Where are the live Real Estate Development and 2012 tables?

Real Estate Development donations carries the $10,060,725 occupation total. The 2012 election cycle hub places Real Estate Development beside other occupation strings that year. All occupations and All FEC ties list sibling joins. Original filings remain at FEC.gov. This tie page is the Real Estate Development × 2012 intersection only.