Reed Hastings contributions received by SMP

A person-named grouping meeting SMP

Reed Hastings is the grouped employer or occupation key. SMP is committee C00484642. This page is the overlap: itemized individual gifts whose field grouped to REED HASTINGS and whose recipient is that committee. The $5,100,000 figure is the intersection.

120 contributions averaging about $42,500 ($5,100,000 ÷ 120) describe a person-named employer string meeting a Super PAC with a five-million-dollar cell. One hundred twenty lines totaling $5,100,000 average about $42,500. The packet does not say whether those lines are one filer repeating, household members, or a broader roster using the same stored name.

The join exists so the industry hub ($7,590,950) and the committee hub are not treated as the same list. C00484642 is the FEC committee ID on this URL.

REED HASTINGS as stored employer text

REED HASTINGS is filer-entered text. NETFLIX, a personal-name variant, or a family-office legal name can sit in other keys. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS sector into $7,590,950.

A person-named industry key is still FEC employer/occupation text. LobbyVault does not merge it with a public-company employer page. This URL is Reed Hastings × SMP.

SMP (C00484642)

C00484642 is disclosed as SMP. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made. The $5,100,000 is Reed Hastings-coded individual receipts. Other employers giving to SMP appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 120-line filter.

SMP, committee C00484642, received $5,100,000 from Reed Hastings-coded receipts. This page does not list independent expenditures SMP made. Other employers giving to SMP appear on the committee hub.

Sixty-seven percent of the Reed Hastings grouping

About 67.2% of $7,590,950 is $5,100,000 to SMP. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that Reed Hastings as an entity directed the gifts. Two-thirds of a person-named book sitting in one Super PAC is a table fact, not a biography and not a corporate contribution.

The leftover $2,490,950 (32.8% of $7,590,950) went to other committees under the same Reed Hastings grouping, or sits outside this recipient filter. The Reed Hastings industry hub holds that remainder. The SMP page holds receipts whose employer field did not group to REED HASTINGS.

A personal key is not a streaming-award ledger

Streaming, broadband, or other USAspending awards tagged to related corporate names are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $5,100,000 in itemized gifts funded federal work, or that federal work funded the gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Two datasets can share a name without sharing a payment trail.

Cite $5,100,000, 120 contributions, $7,590,950, and C00484642. Keep both sides named: Reed Hastings as grouped text, SMP as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear.

Netflix as a separate employer string, if it exists in the table, is another key. Do not add those dollars to $5,100,000.

How to cite this person × Super PAC join

The Reed Hastings industry page holds the $7,590,950 grouping and the committees that received the other 32.8%. The SMP page holds C00484642 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this 120-line cell.

Researchers who need names behind the 120 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $5,100,000 coded to REED HASTINGS and received by SMP (C00484642), against a grouping of $7,590,950. About 67.2% of that grouping is here; $2,490,950 is not. Dollars per line average about $42,500.

Cite FEC.gov. Keep both sides named: Reed Hastings as grouped text, SMP as recipient. Unique donors are not listed in these headline facts.

120 itemized contributions totaling $5,100,000 average about $42,500 per line ($5,100,000 ÷ 120). The Reed Hastings grouping totals $7,590,950; this committee is 67.2% of that book. The leftover $2,490,950 (32.8%) went to other committees under the same Reed Hastings grouping. Unitemized gifts never appear. Independent expenditures are not in this join. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Cite FEC.gov for $5,100,000, 120 contributions, $7,590,950, and C00484642. Keep both sides named: Reed Hastings as grouped text, SMP as recipient. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control. A high or low line count is a filing pattern, not a unique-donor census.

Questions

How much did Reed Hastings-coded donors give SMP?

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $5,100,000 coded to the Reed Hastings grouping and received by SMP (C00484642). That join covers 120 contributions. The broader grouping across all committees is $7,590,950. These figures are not independent expenditures.

Did Reed Hastings the person donate $5,100,000 as one check?

The packet stores REED HASTINGS as an employer/industry grouping and 120 contribution lines totaling $5,100,000 to SMP (C00484642). It does not identify unique donors or prove a single filer. Mean size near $42,500 is a ratio, not a confirmed personal check.

What share of this grouping went to SMP?

About 67.2% of the $7,590,950 Reed Hastings total is in this join: $5,100,000 to SMP. About $2,490,950 went to other committees. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the labeled entity directed the gifts.

Why are there 120 contributions in this SMP cell?

The packet lists 120 itemized contribution lines totaling $5,100,000, about $42,500 per line. That is a receipt count, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are not in this join. Use the C00484642 hub for other receipt types.