Renaissance Technologies political money in the 2014 cycle

Seven donors, more lines than 2012’s shape

Seven keys and 54 lines average about 7.7 receipts per donor—higher lines-per-person than a simple three-committee pattern. Average line size is about $50,156. Average per donor is about $386,921. Those 2014 ratios are this packet’s facts only. The 2012 join used 9 donors and 35 lines; that is a different file. Do not blend the two cycle counts into one sentence of official numbers on this page.

The $2,708,450 remains individual receipts tagged to this employer string. It is not fund performance and not a PAC.

The 2014 Renaissance Technologies cell is $2,708,450 on 54 lines from 7 donors, 16.9% of the same $16,044,442 industry total used on the 2012 page. Seven keys and about 7.7 lines each is a denser lines-per-donor pattern than 2012’s 35-and-9 shape, but this file does not import 2012’s cycle dollars as facts. Official 2014 numbers are $2,708,450, 54, 7, and the shared lifetime roll. Average line size about $50,156 is this packet’s arithmetic only.

16.9% of the same $16.0 million roll

Both Renaissance Technologies cycle pages share the industry total $16,044,442. 2014’s $2,708,450 is 16.9% of that roll. A midterm taking about one-sixth of the key is a substantial slice. Adding 2012 and 2014 cells would still leave other years inside the $16,044,442. This file does not perform that addition with 2012’s dollars, because 2012’s cycle total is not a fact in this packet.

The industry hub is the year index. This tie isolates 2014.

Midterm calendar, named quant employer

2014 elected a Congress. Itemized gifts still reached whatever federal committees filed in the window. Recipients are on the overlay. This prose names Renaissance Technologies and 2014 so neither side of the join is dropped.

Generic Investments and Investor strings remain other keys. Seven donors here are not the hundreds of occupation-label donors on those pages.

Exclusions

Independent expenditures, PACs, and state gifts are outside $2,708,450. USAspending technology or financial awards are a different dataset. The word technologies is not a payment chain.

Unitemized gifts are absent. Seven donor keys are matching results for 2014 inside this grouping.

Related pages

The Renaissance Technologies 2014 overlay is the data join. The industry hub holds $16,044,442. The 2014 election-cycle hub holds every employer string that year. The ties index holds other industry–cycle pages, including the 2012 Renaissance Technologies URL as a separate join.

Citing the midterm Renaissance Technologies cut

Write Renaissance Technologies, 2014, $2,708,450, 54 contributions, 7 donors, 16.9% of $16,044,442, source FEC.gov. Send readers to the 2012 join for the presidential cut instead of blending cycle cells. Send them to Investor and Investments pages if they want occupation labels rather than this named-fund string.

The overlay lists the 54 lines’ committees. The industry hub holds $16,044,442. The 2014 election-cycle hub places this seven-donor cell among other 2014 employer strings. The ties index holds other joins. PAC disbursements and independent expenditures are other schedules. USAspending awards are another government. The word technologies is not a trail from these receipts to those awards.

Seven donor keys are matching results, not a headcount of a research desk. Fifty-four lines can be joint fundraising, candidate support, or Super PAC gifts. The overlay is the place to see which. This prose keeps both sides of the join in view: Renaissance Technologies and the 2014 cycle.

Seven donors, 54 lines, $2,708,450, 16.9% of $16,044,442: that is the midterm join. It is not the 2012 join. It is not the Investor occupation join. Quote those 2014 numbers together, send readers to the overlay for the 54 committees, and stop before models, returns, or USAspending technology awards.

Questions

How much FEC money is tagged Renaissance Technologies in 2014?

The join records $2,708,450 in itemized individual contributions for Renaissance Technologies in 2014, from 54 contributions and 7 donors. The grouping’s all-cycle total is $16,044,442.

Is this the same as the 2012 Renaissance Technologies page?

Same industry key and same $16,044,442 all-cycle total; different cycle cell. 2014 facts are $2,708,450, 54 lines, and 7 donors only.

What share of the grouping is 2014?

16.9%: $2,708,450 of $16,044,442. Other cycles hold the rest. Use the industry hub to move between years.

Does this include the firm’s PAC?

No. The $2,708,450 cell is individual receipts. PAC disbursements and independent expenditures are separate FEC schedules.