Renaissance contributions received by PRIORITIES USA ACTION
Donors who listed Renaissance as their employer sent $15,000,000 in itemized individual contributions to PRIORITIES USA ACTION, according to FEC.gov aggregates. That committee total covers 682 contributions and sits against $31,398,315 attributed to the Renaissance employer grouping nationwide. This page is a join: one employer/industry bucket on one side, one recipient committee (C00495861) on the other. It is not a claim that a hedge fund wrote the checks from its treasury, and it is not independent-expenditure spending.
Key figures
- PRIORITIES USA ACTION received $15,000,000 from Renaissance-coded individual contributions across 682 itemized gifts.
- The Renaissance employer grouping totals $31,398,315, so this committee accounts for about 48% of that labeled money.
- RENAISSANCE is a one-word filer string, not a disambiguated legal entity.
- Figures are FEC itemized individual contributions, not independent expenditures.
A one-word employer meeting a Super PAC
RENAISSANCE is a short employer string. It may refer to Renaissance Technologies, a hotel brand, a school, or another filer-entered use of the word. LobbyVault does not disambiguate. The grouping totals $31,398,315. PRIORITIES USA ACTION, committee C00495861, received $15,000,000 of that grouping across 682 contributions—about 48% of the employer total. Thompson Medical Co Inc also meets this Super PAC on a separate tie page.
About $16,398,315 of Renaissance-coded money ($31,398,315 − $15,000,000) went to other committees. The remainder is slightly larger than the join. The industry hub is therefore not a Priorities USA clone. This tie is the near-half that landed at C00495861.
682 lines averaging about $21,994
Six hundred eighty-two itemized contributions totaling $15,000,000 average about $21,994 per line. That mean is lower than many eight-figure Super PAC cells with dozens of lines. Volume is higher; dollars per line are smaller. Unique donors are not listed. Repeat gifts raise 682 without adding people.
Renaissance Technologies, Renaissance Hotel, and Renaissance School as fully typed names are other keys if they differ from RENAISSANCE alone. This page does not merge them. The $31,398,315 total is the single word as stored.
PRIORITIES USA ACTION (C00495861)
C00495861 is a Super PAC disclosed as PRIORITIES USA ACTION. Independent expenditures that committee reports are outside $15,000,000. The cell is individual contributions coded to Renaissance. Other employers on the committee hub, including Thompson Medical Co Inc, are outside these 682 rows.
Do not add $15,000,000 to another Priorities USA employer join on this URL. That sum belongs on the committee hub. Each filter is its own intersection.
A renaissance label is not a research grant
FEC individual receipts do not fund USAspending awards to universities, hotels, or quantitative funds. Shared words across datasets are not a money trail. This page does not assign party, rank Super PACs, or treat 48% as proof of direction by a firm.
Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Cite $15,000,000, 682 contributions, $31,398,315, and C00495861. Keep RENAISSANCE labeled as ambiguous filer text.
Linked hubs
The Renaissance industry page holds the $31,398,315 employer total. The PRIORITIES USA ACTION page holds C00495861 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs, including other one-word employer strings, without mixing independent expenditures into this 682-line cell.
47.8 percent is $15,000,000 of $31,398,315. The leftover $16,398,315 is Renaissance-coded money on other committees, slightly larger than the join. 682 lines at about $21,994 each describe a one-word employer string. Thompson Medical Co Inc also meets this Super PAC on a separate URL.
Renaissance Technologies or a hotel name spelled out are other keys. Do not add $15,000,000 to another Priorities USA employer cell on this page. Independent expenditures by Priorities USA Action are outside $15,000,000. Unique donors are not listed.
Cite FEC.gov. Do not disambiguate the one-word employer into a fund, a school, or a hotel. Do not treat 47.8% as proof a named firm directed the Super PAC or as university or hotel awards on USAspending. The industry hub remains the place to see the other half of $31,398,315.
Researchers who need names behind the 682 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $15,000,000 coded to RENAISSANCE and received by PRIORITIES USA ACTION (C00495861), against an employer grouping of $31,398,315. About 48% of that grouping is here; $16,398,315 is not. Dollars per line average about $21,994. That ratio is arithmetic on the packet facts, not a typical gift and not a legal finding. Unitemized receipts, independent expenditures, and USAspending awards remain outside the join. Cite FEC.gov. One word is not a disambiguated legal entity.
Questions
- How much did Renaissance donors give Priorities USA Action?
- FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $15,000,000 coded to the Renaissance employer grouping and received by PRIORITIES USA ACTION (C00495861). That join covers 682 contributions. The broader Renaissance employer total across all committees is $31,398,315. These figures are not independent expenditures.
- Is Renaissance the same as Renaissance Technologies?
- Not on this page. RENAISSANCE is the employer string as filed. Longer legal names are other keys if the text differs. This page does not disambiguate hotels, schools, or funds. It reports the labeled join to committee C00495861 from itemized individual contributions only.
- What share of Renaissance FEC money went to this Super PAC?
- About 48% of the $31,398,315 Renaissance employer total is in this join: $15,000,000 to PRIORITIES USA ACTION. About $16,398,315 went to other committees. That near-even split describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that a named firm directed the gifts.
- Does this include Priorities USA Action independent expenditures?
- No. The source is FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Independent expenditures and operating costs are outside this join. Use the C00495861 committee hub for other receipt and spending types not in this employer filter.
FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.