Richelson Oil/Gas political contributions from Tulsa, OK

What the Richelson Oil/Gas × Tulsa, OK overlap is

Two stored strings produce $11,000: city TULSA (OK) and grouping RICHELSON OIL/GAS. 2 itemized receipts and 1 donors survive both filters. $128,640,043 is the city dimension with the industry filter removed (270,118 city-field contributions). $11,000 is under 0.1% of that city book. One harvested donor accounts for all 2 receipts in this cell, totaling $11,000. That headcount is a stored-label cluster, not a named person on this page.

This is not a restatement of Tulsa, OK, which mixes every employer string. It is not a restatement of Richelson Oil/Gas, which mixes every city. 2 rows exist only at the intersection. Correlation is not causation: an employer field plus a city field does not prove why someone gave or whom they supported. Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by donor city and employer/industry grouping.

What the Tulsa, OK city book holds

On the city side, TULSA in OK indexes $128,640,043 of itemized individual dollars on 270,118 city-field lines. The Richelson Oil/Gas slice is $11,000 (under 0.1%). The complement inside the city book used other stored groupings and equals $128,629,043. 270,118 is a city-wide contribution count, not a unique-resident count.

Tulsa, OK is stored as TULSA in Oklahoma; other Oklahoma city strings are other keys. Keep state OK on the name so TULSA is not merged with a same-named place elsewhere. Use the live Tulsa, OK hub when you need the city table without the Richelson Oil/Gas filter. If the live city total moved after a later ingest, FEC.gov and the hub control.

What RICHELSON OIL/GAS means on the tape

RICHELSON OIL/GAS is stored as a employer/industry string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every related job title. 1 donors and 2 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or a company tree. Blank, abbreviated, and alternate spellings are other keys.

Mean about $5,500 per receipt and $11,000 per donor are $11,000/2 and $11,000/1. They are not typical pay and not a median gift. 1 harvested donors is the harvested headcount for this join, not employment in Tulsa, OK. Canonical path /ties/richelson-oil-gas-donors-in-ok-tulsa/ is the /ties/ URL for Richelson Oil/Gas in Tulsa, OK.

Unitemized gifts and other FEC files

Omitted: unitemized individual gifts, independent expenditures, committee-to-committee transfers, and non-individual sources. Omitted: every city except TULSA. Omitted: every grouping except RICHELSON OIL/GAS. Included: $11,000 on 2 receipts from 1 donors.

An OK address does not mean the recipient was a Oklahoma candidate. Donor city is not recipient city. $11,000 is not allocated by office or party on this page. Those splits are not in the packet. Oklahoma state-office filings sit outside $11,000.

How to cite the pair

Citation template: employer/industry grouping RICHELSON OIL/GAS, contributor city Tulsa, OK, $11,000 on 2 itemized individual contributions from 1 donors, against a city-wide $128,640,043 on 270,118 contributions (under 0.1% of city dollars). Source: FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

Then send the reader to the live Tulsa, OK hub, the Richelson Oil/Gas industry page, Oklahoma campaign finance, and All FEC ties. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live hubs control. Per-receipt mean about $5,500 is 11000/2. Per-donor mean about $11,000 is 11000/1.

Tulsa, OK × Richelson Oil/Gas: dollars versus rows

Dollars and rows can move in different directions in other joins; here they are simply $11,000 and 2 for the grouping, $128,640,043 and 270,118 for the city. under 0.1% uses dollars. A receipt share would use 2 and 270,118 as a raw ratio of packet counts, still not unique people.

1 harvested donors produced the grouping file in Tulsa, OK. Repeat itemizations explain why receipts (2) and donors (1) can differ. Oklahoma pages still mix TULSA with every other OK city and mix RICHELSON OIL/GAS with every other grouping. This tie does not. A citation that names $11,000 must also name Tulsa, OK and Richelson Oil/Gas, or it has described a hub.

Questions

How much did Richelson Oil/Gas donors in Tulsa, OK give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry grouping RICHELSON OIL/GAS and city TULSA total $11,000 across 2 receipts from 1 donors in this extract. That is the city-and-industry join, not Tulsa, OK's all-industry book of $128,640,043 on 270,118 contributions. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Labels are filer-entered.

Does Richelson Oil/Gas in Tulsa, OK include every related job title?

No. RICHELSON OIL/GAS is the exact stored string on the itemization. Other employer spellings, parent names, and related job titles are other keys and are omitted from $11,000. 1 donors and 2 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or NAICS sector.

What share of Tulsa, OK itemized money is Richelson Oil/Gas?

$11,000 is under 0.1% of the $128,640,043 Tulsa, OK city book (270,118 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent from Tulsa, OK. Quote both dollars when citing the join. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking or a Oklahoma share.

Do Richelson Oil/Gas donations in Tulsa, OK fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $11,000 does not become a contract or assistance award because both datasets can mention Tulsa, OK. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Filings remain on FEC.gov.