SC Development Comm political contributions from Greenville, SC

How SC Development Comm meets Greenville, SC on the FEC tape

$79,195 is the overlap of two filer-entered fields: industry/employer grouping SC DEVELOPMENT COMM and contributor city GREENVILLE with state SC. LobbyVault keeps a Greenville, SC city hub and an SC Development Comm industry hub. Neither hub is this join. The city hub is all industries in Greenville. The industry hub is that string across cities. This page is only both filters at once.

5 contributions from 1 donor produced $79,195. Repeat gifts add receipts; 1 donor is the headcount in this extract for the join, not a Census of SC Development Comm workers in Greenville. Arithmetic mean per receipt is about $15,839; per donor, about $79,195. Those means are division of packet facts, not typical salaries and not medians.

SC DEVELOPMENT COMM is the stored employer/industry string, not a rewritten official agency name and not a sector roll-up. Other Greenville employers are other keys. $79,195 counts only rows that stored this string with contributor city GREENVILLE.

The Greenville side of the SC Development Comm join

Greenville, SC’s all-industry itemized book in this extract is $31.4 million across 97,244 contributions. $79,195 is 0.3% of that city book. A thin join with 1 donor is still a join: it is the overlap of SC DEVELOPMENT COMM and GREENVILLE, not a ranking of Greenville employers.

The stored city sits in Greenville County, South Carolina. Spartanburg and Columbia are other South Carolina city keys. South Carolina campaign-finance pages include other cities. Do not add $79,195 to the state hub; the state extract already contains these rows when the same tape is used. All FEC ties lists other city-industry pages. None of them converts $79,195 into spending by Greenville candidates.

The SC Development Comm side outside Greenville

The SC Development Comm industry hub is the same stored string in every city, not a South Carolina-only table. $79,195 is the Greenville, SC slice of that string. A donor in another city who stored SC DEVELOPMENT COMM is not in this join. A donor in Greenville who stored a different employer string is not in this join either.

This packet does not name committees, parties, or cycles for the SC Development Comm × Greenville, SC overlap. Open the live SC Development Comm page and the live Greenville, SC page for those breakdowns if the extract publishes them. This prose stays on $79,195, 5 receipts, 1 donor, and the $31.4 million city book.

Quote the join with both nouns in the same sentence so a downstream citation cannot drop a side. A later amendment wave can move a dollar without this file rewriting itself. Treat the live LobbyVault hub as newer than this packet snapshot.

What the SC Development Comm × Greenville dollars omit

Unitemized federal gifts sit outside $79,195. South Carolina state-office filings sit outside it. Independent expenditures are a different FEC file. City labels and industry labels are both filer-entered; LobbyVault does not recode GREENVILLE into a Census place or SC DEVELOPMENT COMM into a standardized occupation. PAC or joint-fundraising addresses that stored this pair of strings follow the same rule as household streets.

Do not read $79,195 as proof that SC Development Comm “controls” Greenville politics. The join is two fields. Correlation is not causation. If the live hubs disagree with $79,195 or 1 donor, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system.

Contribution lines can cluster in a few ZIPs or spread across many. This packet does not list those ZIPs. Open the city hub rather than guessing a postal split from the city string alone.

Using Greenville, SC and SC Development Comm links without mixing statutes

Internal links go to Greenville, SC, SC Development Comm, South Carolina campaign finance, and All FEC ties. Use those four doors. FEC individual contributions are not USAspending awards. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Do not add $79,195 to federal spending in South Carolina.

Researchers citing the join should keep both nouns in the sentence: SC Development Comm and Greenville, SC. Dropping either noun turns this page into a restatement of a hub it is not. $79,195 across 5 receipts from 1 donor is the only overlap this extract published.

Questions

How much did SC Development Comm donors in Greenville, SC give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry SC DEVELOPMENT COMM and city GREENVILLE total $79,195 across 5 receipts from 1 donor in this extract. That is the join, not Greenville, SC’s all-industry book of $31.4 million. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does SC Development Comm in Greenville include every related job title?

No. SC DEVELOPMENT COMM is the exact stored string. Other employer spellings are other keys and are omitted from $79,195. 1 donor and 5 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list.

What share of Greenville, SC itemized money is SC Development Comm?

$79,195 is 0.3% of the $31.4 million Greenville, SC city book (97,244 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that SC Development Comm workers are absent. Quote both dollars. Do not upgrade 0.3% into a sector ranking.

Are the SC Development Comm Greenville figures from FEC.gov?

Yes. The numbers are FEC.gov itemized contribution aggregates indexed on LobbyVault: $79,195, 5 receipts, 1 donor for the join, and $31.4 million for the city string. If a later extract disagrees with this snapshot, the Commission’s filing controls.