Titan Sports political money — 2010 cycle

Titan Sports as stored text, 2010 as cycle

Employer groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Titan Sports and 2010 — sum to $53,124,350. 150 itemized contributions and 1 unique donor produced it. The total is not a corporate treasury gift and is not the company’s PAC. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables.

Neither the Titan Sports hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. Titan Sports is an employer/industry string on the itemization, not a verified corporate family, not a PAC, and not a sports-league dues roll. 1 donor and 150 lines in 2010 matched that employer text. TITAN, WORLD WRESTLING, WWE, and other sports-entertainment spellings sit in other keys if filers typed them that way. This page is the stored string TITAN SPORTS.

LobbyVault keeps this two-key page so a reader can open Titan Sports 2010 without treating the industry hub as a cycle total or the 2010 cycle hub as an employer total. The overlay at the Titan Sports 2010 path holds the itemized rows for this cell. This prose publishes the packet snapshot: $53,124,350, 150 contributions, 1 donors, and 72.3% of $73,478,236.

72.3% of the Titan Sports roll

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $73,478,236. The 2010 slice of $53,124,350 is about 72.3% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 27.7% ($20,353,886). Treating 2010 as the Titan Sports FEC story would ignore that remainder.

72.3% is a large share of the stored Titan Sports book. That concentration describes this extract’s cycle mix for the string TITAN SPORTS; it is not proof of a one-cycle political program and not a finding that later cycles are empty. Treat $73,478,236 as the denominator for the 72.3% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not payroll. The industry hub is the year index for this string.

A 72.3% cell can sit next to larger or smaller even-year windows on the same Titan Sports hub. This packet does not publish those other cycle dollars, so they are not cited here. Open Titan Sports to drop the year filter. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter.

150 contributions from 1 donor

Dividing $53,124,350 by 150 contributions yields about $354,162 per itemized gift. Dividing by 1 donor yields about $53,124,350 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 150.0. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split.

1 unique donor is a small headcount. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count (150 lines) faster than the donor count. A one- or few-donor cell is still itemized individual contributions grouped by employer text — not a corporate contribution, not a PAC, and not a unique-employee census. Retirees and household members who reuse a workplace or title can appear. The overlay for Titan Sports 2010 holds the rows.

150 is a receipt count, not a unique-person census beyond the 1 donor figure already in the packet. A person who gave twice is two lines inside the 150. Unitemized gifts never appear in $53,124,350.

2010 as the cycle dimension

The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. Titan Sports is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Titan Sports to drop the year.

Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $53,124,350 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 150 contributions, the 1 unique donor, and the 72.3% share of $73,478,236.

2010 is a midterm federal cycle on FEC.gov. That calendar label does not explain $53,124,350. This packet does not carry party splits, committee names, or occupation mix beyond the stored string TITAN SPORTS. Cite the two packet dollars — $53,124,350 for the 2010 slice and $73,478,236 for the Titan Sports book — and stop before assigning motive.

What the Commission does not verify

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $53,124,350. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is not a wrestling-promotion PAC and not a sports NAICS total.

Correlation between an employer or occupation string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 1 donor, and 150 contributions. TITAN, WORLD WRESTLING, WWE, and other sports-entertainment spellings sit in other keys if filers typed them that way. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.

Do not read $53,124,350 as proof that Titan Sports “drove” the 2010 cycle or that 2010 “drove” the Titan Sports book. The join is two fields. If the live hubs disagree with $53,124,350 or 1 donors, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system.

Citing Titan Sports and 2010 together

Start with $53,124,350, then Titan Sports 2010 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Titan Sports, 2010, $53,124,350, 150 contributions, 1 donor, 72.3% of $73,478,236, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string TITAN SPORTS.

The 72.3% share, the 1-donor count, and the $354,162 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling occupation word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control.

Questions

How much did Titan Sports-listed donors give in 2010?

FEC.gov aggregates show $53,124,350 in itemized individual contributions for the Titan Sports grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 150 contributions and 1 donor. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $73,478,236 all-cycle figure.

What share of Titan Sports FEC money is 2010?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $73,478,236. The 2010 cell of $53,124,350 is about 72.3% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 27.7% ($20,353,886) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Titan Sports hub holds other cycles; the 2010 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.

Is $53,124,350 the Titan Sports PAC total for 2010?

No. $53,124,350 is itemized individual contributions whose employer field grouped to TITAN SPORTS in the 2010 cycle. It is not committee disbursements, not independent expenditures, and not a verified employee census. 150 contributions came from 1 donor.

Where is the overlay for the Titan Sports 2010 join?

Open Titan Sports 2010 for the cycle overlay, Titan Sports for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows.