Walter Duncan Oil Properties political contributions from Denver, CO

$22,700 exists only where both filters are true

Filter one: contributor city DENVER, state CO. Filter two: employer/industry grouping WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES. Result: $22,700, 10 itemized contributions, 1 donor. City-only result: $238,927,176, 599,360 contributions. Industry-only result across cities is not restated here except as the same $22,700 / 10 / 1 published for this grouping in the packet's industry-side facts.

This packet publishes the industry-side dollars for the grouping as $22,700 with 10 contributions and 1 donor. Combined with the city filter, those figures are the join. If the industry hub later shows a different national total, the live hub controls; this snapshot uses the packet.

Denver is stored as DENVER in Colorado; suburban city strings are other keys. Mean per receipt about $2,270; mean per donor about $22,700. WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES is an exact employer/industry string on the itemization, not a NAICS sector and not every person who works in a related job.

Denver, CO is more than this grouping

$22,700 is under 0.1% of $238,927,176. That percentage uses city dollars as the denominator, not Colorado dollars and not national industry dollars. 599,360 contributions is the city row count in the packet. A row-share of the join would be 10 / 599,360 if cited as a ratio of those two packet counts — still not unique people.

Keep Denver and Walter Duncan Oil Properties in the same sentence when citing $22,700. Denver is stored as DENVER in Colorado; suburban city strings are other keys. City labels are filer-entered.

How to read 10 receipts and 1 donor

Industry facts in the packet: $22,700, 10 contributions, 1 donor, grouping WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES. City facts: $238,927,176, 599,360 contributions, city DENVER, state CO. The join uses all of them. Missing from the packet: party, office, cycle, recipient names. Those are not invented.

If the live Walter Duncan Oil Properties hub disagrees with $22,700 or 1 donor, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system.

This URL (/ties/walter-duncan-oil-properties-donors-in-co-denver/) is only Walter Duncan Oil Properties in Denver, CO. The city hub still mixes every employer string into $238,927,176. The industry hub still mixes every city. This JSON is the intersection copy only.

Stored keys are city DENVER, state CO, grouping WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES. Display names Denver and Walter Duncan Oil Properties are for readers. Aggregates follow the stored keys. Nearby spellings are other pages and are omitted from $22,700.

Why $22,700 is not Colorado spending

Colorado campaign-finance pages mix cities and cycles. This page mixes neither. It holds Walter Duncan Oil Properties and Denver, CO only. $22,700 should not be cited as a Colorado industry total.

Independent expenditures, electioneering communications, and PAC operating expenditures are other FEC tables. They are not folded into $22,700. Unitemized gifts are not folded in either.

Raw integers behind the prose: grouping dollars 22,700, grouping receipts 10, harvested donors 1, city dollars 238,927,176, city-field contributions 599,360. Share under 0.1% uses only the two dollar totals. Remainder of the city book is $238,904,476 (more than 99.9%).

Citing $22,700 without dropping a side

If you drop Denver from a sentence about $22,700, you have described the industry hub, which this page is not. If you drop Walter Duncan Oil Properties, you have described the city hub, which this page is not. Keep WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES and DENVER together. under 0.1% of $238,927,176 is the only share computed here.

Unitemized gifts remain outside every total on this page. Independent expenditures remain outside. Colorado state-office filings remain outside.

Per-receipt mean about $2,270 is 22,700/10. Per-donor mean about $22,700 is 22,700/1. Receipts (10) and donors (1) differ when the same harvested donor appears on more than one itemized line. Both counts are packet facts.

Snapshot versus live extract

This prose freezes the packet. FEC.gov continues. If the live Denver, CO hub shows a different city total than $238,927,176, or the live Walter Duncan Oil Properties hub shows a different grouping total than $22,700, trust the live extract. Do not average the two systems.

Until then, the join is $22,700 on 10 receipts from 1 donor in Denver, CO, inside a city book of $238,927,176 on 599,360 contributions (under 0.1%). Both sides of the join stay in the title and H1.

Colorado pages still mix Denver with every other CO city and mix WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES with every other grouping. This tie does not. A citation that names $22,700 must also name Denver, CO and Walter Duncan Oil Properties, or it has described a hub.

Questions

How much did Walter Duncan Oil Properties donors in Denver, CO give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry grouping WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES and city DENVER total $22,700 across 10 receipts from 1 donor in this extract. That is the city-and-industry join, not Denver, CO's all-industry book of $238,927,176 on 599,360 contributions. Original reports remain on FEC.gov. Labels are filer-entered.

Does Walter Duncan Oil Properties in Denver include every related job title?

No. WALTER DUNCAN OIL PROPERTIES is the exact stored string on the itemization. Other employer spellings, parent names, and related job titles are other keys and are omitted from $22,700. 1 donor and 10 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or NAICS sector.

What share of Denver, CO itemized money is Walter Duncan Oil Properties?

$22,700 is under 0.1% of the $238,927,176 Denver, CO city book (599,360 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent from Denver. Quote both dollars when citing the join. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking or a Colorado share.

Do Walter Duncan Oil Properties donations in Denver fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $22,700 does not become a contract or assistance award because both datasets can mention Denver. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars and no award counts. Filings remain on FEC.gov.