Waste Management Inc gifts received by WM Employees Fund

Waste Management Inc meeting WM Employees Fund

Waste Management Inc is the grouped employer or occupation key. WASTE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BETTER GOVERNMENT FUND is committee C00119008. This page is the overlap: itemized individual gifts whose field grouped to WASTE MANAGEMENT INC and whose recipient is that committee. The $270,923 figure is the intersection.

1,379 contributions averaging about $196 ($270,923 ÷ 1,379) describe this cell. The packet does not name the 1,379 filers or say whether they are one household repeating. A line count is a filing pattern, not a unique-donor census. Waste Management Inc × WM Employees Fund is an industry-to-committee join, not a donor roster.

The join exists so the industry hub ($4,980,971) and the committee hub are not treated as the same list. C00119008 is the FEC committee ID on this URL. Independent expenditures stay outside $270,923. WASTE MANAGEMENT INC is hauler employer text as stored, not Waste Management as a treasury.

WASTE MANAGEMENT INC as stored FEC employer text

WASTE MANAGEMENT INC is filer-entered text. Hauler employer text as stored, not waste management as a treasury. Neighboring spellings can sit on other keys. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS sector into $4,980,971.

Occupation strings without this employer key sit on occupation hubs. This URL is Waste Management Inc × WM Employees Fund, an industry-to-committee join, not an industry-to-cycle cell. Open the Waste Management Inc industry hub for the $4,980,971 employer total and other committees. The 5.4% ratio is $270,923 divided by $4,980,971. Other committee joins for WASTE MANAGEMENT INC are not listed in this packet; they collectively hold $4,710,048. Citing WM Employees Fund as if it were the Waste Management Inc lifetime total would overstate this cell by $4,710,048.

WASTE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BETTER GOVERNMENT FUND (C00119008)

C00119008 is disclosed as WASTE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BETTER GOVERNMENT FUND. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made. The $270,923 is Waste Management Inc-coded individual receipts. Other employers giving to WM Employees Fund appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 1,379-line filter.

1,379 lines at about $196 each describe the cell arithmetic. That mean is $270,923 divided by 1,379. It is not a typical gift, not a limit, and not a payroll calendar. It does not identify who directed the gifts or whether Waste Management Inc as an entity participated. A mean of $196 per itemized line can hide a few large receipts. The packet supplies no median and no unique-donor count. 1,379 contributions remain a line count, not a headcount.

5.4% of the Waste Management Inc grouping

About 5.4% of $4,980,971 is $270,923 to WM Employees Fund. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that Waste Management Inc as an entity directed the gifts. High overlap with one committee is a reporting pattern, not a finding that the labeled entity allocated political money.

The leftover $4,710,048 (94.6% of $4,980,971) went to other committees under the same Waste Management Inc grouping, or sits outside this recipient filter. The Waste Management Inc industry hub holds that remainder. The WASTE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BETTER GOVERNMENT FUND page holds receipts whose employer field did not group to WASTE MANAGEMENT INC. Waste Management Inc as hauler employer text as stored, not Waste Management as a treasury can appear in contracting databases under similar names. Those obligation tables are not this $270,923. The join does not claim a payment trail from campaign gifts to federal awards or the reverse.

What the Commission does not verify

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $270,923. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a committee name does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is hauler employer text as stored, not Waste Management as a treasury, not a sanitation NAICS rollup, WM without Inc as a sibling key, or a named-crew roster.

Correlation between an employer string and a committee is not causation. The records show a text match, a recipient ID, and 1,379 contributions. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control. Quote both keys: Waste Management Inc and WM Employees Fund. Quote the dollars: $270,923. Quote the volume: 1,379 contributions. Quote the source: FEC.gov. Leave NAICS codes and named donors out.

Citing Waste Management Inc and WM Employees Fund together

Start with $270,923, then Waste Management Inc and WM Employees Fund, then the industry hub or the committee hub if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: WASTE MANAGEMENT INC, C00119008, $270,923, 1,379 contributions, 5.4% of $4,980,971, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string.

The 5.4% share and the $196 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling employer word and they stop being facts from this packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Unitemized individual gifts never enter $270,923. Independent expenditures and PAC disbursements are other FEC tables. Sharing a company-like string does not merge those ledgers with C00119008.

Questions

How much did Waste Management Inc-coded filers give this fund?

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $270,923 coded to the Waste Management Inc grouping and received by WASTE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES BETTER GOVERNMENT FUND (C00119008). That join covers 1,379 contributions. The broader grouping across all committees is $4,980,971. These figures are not independent expenditures.

Did Waste Management write a $270,923 corporate check?

No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer field grouped to WASTE MANAGEMENT INC, not a corporate treasury gift. 1,379 lines averaging about $196 do not identify unique employees. This page reports the labeled join to C00119008 only. Occupation and employer labels are filer-entered.

What share of Waste Management Inc FEC money went here?

About 5.4% of the $4,980,971 Waste Management Inc total is in this join: $270,923 to WM Employees Fund. About $4,710,048 went to other committees. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the labeled entity directed the gifts.

Why does this join list 1,379 contributions?

The packet lists 1,379 itemized contribution lines totaling $270,923, about $196 per line. That is a receipt count, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are not in this join. Use the C00119008 hub for other receipt types.