Web Service Co contributions received by BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS

Web Service Co meeting Bloomfield for Congress

WEB SERVICE CO is the grouped employer key. BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS is committee C00516641. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $3,757,080 figure is the intersection. A 95.3% share of an employer grouping landing at one candidate committee is a concentrated cell. Concentration describes the indexed overlap, not a finding that the company directed every gift.

BARON REAL ESTATE is a different employer grouping that also joins to Bloomfield for Congress. Those dollars are not this $3,757,080. Filers who typed Web Service Company, a parent name, or a generic SERVICE occupation without this employer string sit in other keys. This page stays on WEB SERVICE CO as indexed.

Ninety-five percent of the Web Service Co grouping

The WEB SERVICE CO grouping shows $3,941,630 in itemized individual money. The Bloomfield for Congress cell is $3,757,080, or about 95.3% of that total ($3,757,080 ÷ $3,941,630). About 4.7% of Web Service Co-coded receipts went to other committees. That leftover is $184,550 ($3,941,630 − $3,757,080). Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub.

A 95.3% share is not proof that every person associated with the employer gave, or that Bloomfield for Congress received only this employer’s money. The committee overlay includes other employers, including the separate Baron Real Estate cell. The 95.3% figure applies to this spelling only.

81 contributions and a $46,384 mean

BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS received $3,757,080 from WEB SERVICE CO-coded receipts across 81 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $46,384 per contribution ($3,757,080 ÷ 81). An 81-line cell with a five-figure mean is sparser than a payroll PAC and denser than a four-line Super PAC stack.

Repeat givers raise the contribution count. The packet does not publish a unique-donor figure. Eighty-one lines is not a headcount of web-service staff. Candidate-committee contribution limits are not restated here; the packet supplies the join totals only.

A service-company string is not an IT award

Web-service and contractor names appear in federal IT and facilities USAspending records. Those award dollars are not these candidate-committee gifts. This join does not claim that Bloomfield for Congress receipts funded federal IT awards, or that awards funded the receipts. FEC and USAspending share a service-sector word, not a cash pipeline.

Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Correlation between a Web Service Co employer string and a candidate committee is a reporting pattern, not causation of technology-policy outcomes.

Pages that keep the employer and the campaign apart

The Web Service Co industry page keeps the $3,941,630 grouping and the other committees that received the remaining 4.7%. The Bloomfield for Congress page keeps C00516641. All industries ranks other employer keys. All FEC ties lists neighboring cells, including Baron Real Estate’s separate Bloomfield join, without stacking those dollars into this 81-line cell.

The leftover $184,550 is Web Service Co-coded money that did not go to Bloomfield for Congress. Small next to a 95.3% share, but not zero. Cite $3,757,080, 81 contributions, C00516641, and the $3,941,630 grouping. Keep both sides named.

How to cite Web Service Co × Bloomfield for Congress

A complete claim names WEB SERVICE CO and BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS, then $3,757,080, 81 itemized lines, C00516641, and 95.3% of the $3,941,630 grouping, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 81 lines into 81 unique people. Do not add Baron Real Estate’s Bloomfield cell. Do not fold federal IT awards into the cell.

Independent expenditures are omitted. The committee hub is more than these 81 rows. The industry hub is $184,550 larger than this cell. Quote FEC.gov for the overlap only.

WEB SERVICE COMPANY as a longer legal name, if indexed, is another key. This join is WEB SERVICE CO × BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS: $3,757,080, 81 lines, C00516641, 95.3% of $3,941,630. Baron Real Estate’s Bloomfield cell is a neighbor, not a summand. Federal IT and facilities awards that mention a similar vendor are USAspending objects. Eighty-one lines at about $46,384 each sit between a sparse Super PAC stack and a payroll PAC. Unique donors are unpublished. Quote FEC.gov. Keep both sides of the name whenever the dollars are cited.

Questions

How much did Web Service Co-coded donors give Bloomfield for Congress?

FEC.gov aggregates show $3,757,080 in itemized individual contributions grouped to WEB SERVICE CO and received by BLOOMFIELD FOR CONGRESS (C00516641). That join covers 81 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $3,941,630. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of Web Service Co FEC money went to this committee?

About 95.3% of the $3,941,630 WEB SERVICE CO total is in this join: $3,757,080 to C00516641. The leftover $184,550 went to other committees. A near-total share describes overlap, not a finding that the company directed every gift.

Is this the same money as Baron Real Estate to Bloomfield for Congress?

No. BARON REAL ESTATE is a different employer grouping with its own join to C00516641. This page reports only WEB SERVICE CO-coded receipts: $3,757,080 across 81 contributions. Stacking employer strings would blur both cells.

Do these gifts fund federal IT or service awards?

No. FEC individual contributions and USAspending obligations are different datasets. Sharing a service-company name does not create a funding pipeline. This tie reports only the employer–committee intersection on itemized individual receipts.