DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT
2010 Election Cycle
Total Donated
$146,560
Contributions
88
Unique Donors
30
The Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2010 cell holds $210,960. That figure comes from FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates: 112 contributions, 39 donors, keyed to the stored string DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT. Lifetime for the grouping is $4,097,329, so 2010 is about 5.1% of the roll. Not a drexel pac, not a firm-revenue figure, and not proof the partnership still existed as a going concern in 2010.
Key figures
- Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2010 is $210,960 in itemized individual contributions.
- The cell includes 112 contributions from 39 donors.
- 2010 is about 5.1% of the grouping’s $4,097,329 all-cycle total.
- The label is self-reported form text (historical brokerage employer text as stored), not a PAC.
- FEC gifts and federal award files remain separate datasets.
The Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2010 join
LobbyVault stores employer and occupation text as grouped strings and election cycles as two-year tags. Where Drexel Burnham Lambert meets 2010, the itemized individual total is $210,960. That is 112 contributions from 39 donors. The figure is not a corporate treasury transfer and does not identify who received the money. Cite FEC.gov.
The drexel burnham lambert hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub restates a one-key total. This tie keeps both keys. Drexel Burnham Lambert is historical brokerage employer text as stored. DREXEL, DREXEL BURNHAM, and DBL are other keys. Rows that used those other strings are not added into $210,960.
A share of 5.1% versus $4,097,329 is a scale check, not a ranking of cycles and not evidence of a coordinated program. The remaining 94.9% ($3,886,369) lives on other even-year pages for the same string. 2010 is a midterm even-year window; that fact describes the FEC calendar, not which contests received the money.
Scale: $210,960 versus $4,097,329
The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $4,097,329. The 2010 slice of $210,960 is about 5.1% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 94.9% ($3,886,369). Treating 2010 as the entire Drexel Burnham Lambert FEC story would ignore that remainder. The industry hub is the year index for this string.
Treat $4,097,329 as the denominator for the 5.1% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $4,097,329. Neighboring spellings are not added into either figure.
Full analysis: Drexel Burnham Lambert and the 2010 cycle →
Questions
- How much did Drexel Burnham Lambert donors give in 2010?
- FEC.gov aggregates show $210,960 in itemized individual contributions for the Drexel Burnham Lambert grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 112 contributions and 39 donors. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $4,097,329 all-cycle figure. Independent expenditures are not included.
- What share of Drexel Burnham Lambert FEC money is 2010?
- The grouping’s all-cycle total is $4,097,329. The 2010 cell of $210,960 is about 5.1% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 94.9% ($3,886,369) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell.
- Does this include only people currently employed by Drexel Burnham Lambert?
- No. The bucket is the self-reported string DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT. The FEC does not verify licenses, current jobs, or corporate identity. Related phrases may sit in other groupings. This join reports the string match for 2010 only, totaling $210,960 from 39 donors across 112 contributions.
- Where is the overlay for the Drexel Burnham Lambert 2010 join?
- Open Drexel Burnham Lambert 2010 for the cycle overlay, Drexel Burnham Lambert for the grouping hub, and 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows. Cite FEC.gov for $210,960, 112 contributions, and 39 donors.
FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.
Related ties
Top Donors in 2010
| # | Name | Total | Contributions | City / State | Occupation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BLACK, LEON D MR | $30,400 | 1 | WESTON, CT | — |
| 2 | POST, LAWRENCE A | $18,000 | 5 | BEVERLY HILLS, CA | — |
| 3 | HANNAN, JOHN J | $16,800 | 7 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
| 4 | WAGNER, LEON | $12,000 | 7 | BROOKLYN, NY | — |
| 5 | HARMAN, REED L MR | $8,400 | 3 | RANCHO PALOS VERDE, CA | — |
| 6 | BILGER, ARTHUR H | $7,200 | 3 | BEVERLY HILL, CA | — |
| 7 | ROSS, DONALD | $5,050 | 8 | — | — |
| 8 | MOELIS, KENNETH D MR | $5,000 | 1 | LOS ANGELES, CA | — |
| 9 | WALLACH, ANDREW M | $4,800 | 2 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
| 10 | BLOOM, JAMES | $4,800 | 6 | PHILADELPHIA, PA | — |
| 11 | FISHER, RICHARD MR | $4,700 | 4 | ST LOUIS, MO | — |
| 12 | ANDERSEN, CHRIS | $3,250 | 5 | SUMMIT, NJ | — |
| 13 | ACKERMAN, PETER MR | $2,400 | 1 | LOS ANGELES, CA | — |
| 14 | NEWBERG, BRUCE | $2,400 | 1 | SANTA MONICA, CA | — |
| 15 | FRIEDMAN, JOSHUA S | $2,400 | 1 | LOS ANGELES, CA | — |
| 16 | RAPAPORT, MARC | $2,400 | 1 | LOS ANGELES, CA | — |
| 17 | GOODWIN, ROBERT | $2,310 | 4 | BEVERLY HILLS, CA | — |
| 18 | ROTH, STEPHEN | $2,000 | 1 | BEVERLY HILLS, CA | — |
| 19 | JOHNSON, ROY | $1,900 | 4 | ENCINO, CA | — |
| 20 | KISSICK, JOHN H | $1,500 | 2 | BEVERLY HILL, CA | — |
| 21 | WONG, EUGENE | $1,450 | 6 | ENCINO, CA | — |
| 22 | IRVIN, DANIEL R | $1,000 | 1 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
| 23 | JULIS, MITCHELL R | $1,000 | 1 | BEVERLY HILLS, CA | — |
| 24 | ENGEL, DONALD | $1,000 | 1 | HARRISON, NY | — |
| 25 | SPURGE, LORRAINE | $1,000 | 1 | WOODLAND HILLS, CA | — |
| 26 | SUNSTEIN, LEON C | $1,000 | 2 | PHILADELPHIA, PA | — |
| 27 | COFFIN, JOHN | $1,000 | 4 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
| 28 | WRIGHT, RICHARD J | $600 | 1 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
| 29 | ROBINSON, KENNETH B | $400 | 2 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
| 30 | KAY, DAVID G | $400 | 2 | NEW YORK, NY | — |
Top Recipients in 2010
| # | Committee | Total | Contributions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C00027466 | $35,400 | 2 |
| 2 | C00257337 | $18,000 | 5 |
| 3 | C00204370 | $16,800 | 7 |
| 4 | C00464008 | $12,000 | 7 |
| 5 | C00469924 | $10,800 | 4 |
| 6 | C00413914 | $7,200 | 3 |
| 7 | C00010603 | $6,200 | 10 |
| 8 | C00473132 | $5,050 | 8 |
| 9 | C00346312 | $4,800 | 2 |
| 10 | C00461046 | $4,700 | 4 |
| 11 | C00457267 | $3,250 | 5 |
| 12 | C00458398 | $2,500 | 3 |
| 13 | C00462994 | $2,400 | 1 |
| 14 | C00355461 | $2,400 | 1 |
| 15 | C00315176 | $2,400 | 1 |
| 16 | C00075820 | $2,310 | 4 |
| 17 | C00460139 | $2,000 | 1 |
| 18 | C00432260 | $1,900 | 4 |
| 19 | C00473165 | $1,450 | 6 |
| 20 | C00461681 | $1,000 | 1 |
| 21 | C00466573 | $1,000 | 1 |
| 22 | C00466839 | $1,000 | 1 |
| 23 | C00330894 | $1,000 | 4 |
| 24 | C00278481 | $600 | 1 |
| 25 | C00042366 | $400 | 2 |