Drexel Burnham Lambert and the 2010 cycle

The Drexel Burnham Lambert × 2010 join

LobbyVault stores employer and occupation text as grouped strings and election cycles as two-year tags. Where Drexel Burnham Lambert meets 2010, the itemized individual total is $210,960. That is 112 contributions from 39 donors. The figure is not a corporate treasury transfer and does not identify who received the money. Cite FEC.gov.

The drexel burnham lambert hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub restates a one-key total. This tie keeps both keys. Drexel Burnham Lambert is historical brokerage employer text as stored. DREXEL, DREXEL BURNHAM, and DBL are other keys. Rows that used those other strings are not added into $210,960.

A share of 5.1% versus $4,097,329 is a scale check, not a ranking of cycles and not evidence of a coordinated program. The remaining 94.9% ($3,886,369) lives on other even-year pages for the same string. 2010 is a midterm even-year window; that fact describes the FEC calendar, not which contests received the money.

Scale: $210,960 versus $4,097,329

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $4,097,329. The 2010 slice of $210,960 is about 5.1% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 94.9% ($3,886,369). Treating 2010 as the entire Drexel Burnham Lambert FEC story would ignore that remainder. The industry hub is the year index for this string.

Treat $4,097,329 as the denominator for the 5.1% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $4,097,329. Neighboring spellings are not added into either figure.

Gift count, donor count, and $210,960

Dividing $210,960 by 112 contributions yields about $1,884 per itemized gift. Dividing by 39 donors yields about $5,409 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 2.9. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians, not a party split, and not a typical-gift claim.

39 unique donors are contributor identities, not a headcount of employees, licensees, or members. Retirees and household members who reuse a workplace or title can appear. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count faster than the donor count. The overlay for Drexel Burnham Lambert 2010 holds the rows.

The two-year 2010 window

The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer and occupation for that window. Drexel Burnham Lambert is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Drexel Burnham Lambert to drop the year.

Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $210,960 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 112 contributions, the 39 unique donors, and the 5.1% share of $4,097,329.

Text match is not a payroll file

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $210,960. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. The page is historical brokerage employer text as stored, not a Drexel PAC, not a firm-revenue figure, and not proof the partnership still existed as a going concern in 2010.

Correlation between an employer string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 39 donors, and 112 contributions. DREXEL, DREXEL BURNHAM, and DBL are other keys. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees, the overlay and FEC.gov control.

A citation that keeps both keys

Start with $210,960, then Drexel Burnham Lambert 2010 for rows, then Drexel Burnham Lambert or 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT, 2010, $210,960, 112 contributions, 39 donors, 5.1% of $4,097,329, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string.

The 5.1% share, the 39-donor count, and the $1,884 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling employer word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. 112 itemized contributions totaling $210,960 average about $1,884 per line. Unitemized gifts never appear. Campaign contributions are not federal awards.

Questions

How much did Drexel Burnham Lambert donors give in 2010?

FEC.gov aggregates show $210,960 in itemized individual contributions for the Drexel Burnham Lambert grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 112 contributions and 39 donors. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $4,097,329 all-cycle figure. Independent expenditures are not included.

What share of Drexel Burnham Lambert FEC money is 2010?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $4,097,329. The 2010 cell of $210,960 is about 5.1% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 94.9% ($3,886,369) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell.

Does this include only people currently employed by Drexel Burnham Lambert?

No. The bucket is the self-reported string DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT. The FEC does not verify licenses, current jobs, or corporate identity. Related phrases may sit in other groupings. This join reports the string match for 2010 only, totaling $210,960 from 39 donors across 112 contributions.

Where is the overlay for the Drexel Burnham Lambert 2010 join?

Open Drexel Burnham Lambert 2010 for the cycle overlay, Drexel Burnham Lambert for the grouping hub, and 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows. Cite FEC.gov for $210,960, 112 contributions, and 39 donors.