Consultant political contributions from Greenwich, CT

Consultant as a share of Greenwich, CT itemized money

$13,200 is under 0.1% of Greenwich, CT’s $281,199,418 city book (194,308 contributions). That thin share is a property of an exact-string filter, not a finding that Consultant work is absent from Greenwich, CT. Most city-field receipts stored other employer labels. Quote both dollar figures. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking.

The join is 17 receipts from 2 donors. Two donors produced 17 receipts: the line count is far larger than the headcount, so repeats dominate this slice. Mean per receipt is about $776; mean per harvested donor is about $6,600. Those figures are arithmetic only. FEC.gov remains the source of the underlying Schedule A lines.

CONSULTANT is an occupation-style employer string, not a company name and not every consulting firm in Greenwich. Other employer strings in Greenwich, CT never enter $13,200, even if a reader would group them by trade. LobbyVault does not map filer text to NAICS.

Reading the Greenwich, CT city hub beside this join

Greenwich is a Fairfield County, Connecticut city string. Stamford, Darien, and New York are other stored cities. The Greenwich, CT hub holds $281,199,418 before any employer filter. This page does not restate that hub. It subtracts every industry string except CONSULTANT. The packet has no unique-donor count for the full city, so 194,308 stays a contribution count, not a people count.

Connecticut campaign finance is the Connecticut roll-up. Do not add $13,200 into that state total by hand; the rows already sit there when the same extract is used. All FEC ties collects other city-industry intersections. None of those pages turns $13,200 into candidate spending inside Greenwich, CT.

Consultant beyond Greenwich, CT

The Consultant page is the same stored string nationwide (every city that used CONSULTANT). $13,200 is only the Greenwich, CT slice. A CONSULTANT row in another city is on the industry hub and off this join. A Greenwich, CT row with a different employer string is on the city hub and off this join. Do not treat the industry hub total as this city’s figure.

This packet does not publish cycle, party, or committee cuts for the overlap. If those cuts exist, they live on the live hubs. This prose stays on $13,200, 17 receipts, 2 donors, and the $281,199,418 city book. Quote the join with both nouns in the same sentence so a downstream citation cannot drop a side.

What $13,200 does not include

Unitemized federal gifts, Connecticut state-office reports, and independent expenditures sit outside the join. Filer-entered city GREENWICH is not a Census place code. Filer-entered CONSULTANT is not a standardized occupation. PAC street addresses that stored this pair follow the same exact-match rule as household addresses. Blank employer rows in Greenwich, CT never enter this slice even if a reader would assign them by trade.

Do not treat $13,200 as evidence that Consultant controls Greenwich, CT. Two fields met. Correlation is not causation. If live pages disagree with $13,200 or 2 donors, the newer FEC extract controls. This snapshot is not a third disclosure system. Do not invent donor names from the headcount.

Doors out of the Consultant Greenwich, CT page

Use Greenwich, CT (/cities/ct-greenwich/), Consultant (/industries/consultant/), Connecticut campaign finance (/states/CT/), and All FEC ties (/ties/). Those are the only internal hrefs on this packet. FEC receipts are not USAspending awards. This file has no obligation dollars. Do not add $13,200 to federal spending in Connecticut.

Citation: CONSULTANT × Greenwich, CT = $13,200 on 17 itemized individual contributions from 2 donors; city book $281,199,418 (under 0.1%). Source: FEC.gov aggregates indexed on LobbyVault. City labels are filer-entered.

Keeping the Consultant and Greenwich, CT nouns together

A citation that drops Greenwich, CT restates the industry hub. A citation that drops Consultant restates the city hub. This file exists because both filters are on. $13,200 is already inside $281,199,418; do not add them. Do not invent donor names from the 2-donor count. Cycle windows belong on other join kinds.

If a later extract disagrees with $13,200, 17 receipts, or 2 donors, FEC.gov and the live Greenwich, CT and Consultant hubs control. This prose is a packet snapshot. Unitemized gifts and Connecticut state-office filings remain outside the join even after a refresh.

Questions

How much did Consultant donors in Greenwich, CT give?

Itemized FEC individual contributions storing industry CONSULTANT and city GREENWICH total $13,200 across 17 receipts from 2 donors in this extract. That is the join, not Greenwich, CT’s all-industry book of $281.2 million. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

Does Consultant in Greenwich, CT include every related job title?

No. CONSULTANT is the exact stored string. Other employer spellings are other keys and are omitted from $13,200. 2 donors and 17 receipts follow that exact-match rule. LobbyVault does not map the field to a standardized occupation list or to NAICS.

What share of Greenwich, CT itemized money is Consultant?

$13,200 is under 0.1% of the $281.2 million Greenwich, CT city book (194,308 city-field contributions). A thin share usually means other employer strings dominate the city tape, not that the grouping is absent. Quote both dollars. Do not upgrade under 0.1% into a sector ranking.

Do Consultant donations in Greenwich, CT fund federal spending there?

No. These figures are FEC individual contributions, not USAspending awards. $13,200 does not become a contract because both rows can mention Greenwich, CT. Different statutes, different forms. This packet has no obligation dollars. Filings remain on FEC.gov.