Skip to main content
← All data ties

Doctor contributions received by SLF PAC

Donors who listed Doctor as their employer sent $15,000,250 in itemized individual contributions to SLF PAC, according to FEC.gov aggregates. That committee total covers 514 contributions and sits against $111,741,528 attributed to the Doctor employer grouping nationwide. This page is a join: one employer/industry bucket on one side, one recipient committee (C00571703) on the other. It is not a claim that physicians as a class gave, and it is not independent-expenditure spending.

Key figures

  • SLF PAC received $15,000,250 from Doctor-coded individual contributions across 514 itemized gifts.
  • The Doctor employer grouping totals $111,741,528, so this committee accounts for about 13% of that labeled money.
  • DOCTOR is vague filer text, not a census of licensed physicians.
  • Figures are FEC itemized individual contributions, not independent expenditures or CMS awards.

A medical title that is only 13% of its own grouping

DOCTOR is occupation-like text stored as an employer grouping. The grouping is large: $111,741,528 across every recipient. SLF PAC, committee C00571703, received $15,000,250 of that grouping across 514 contributions—about 13% of the labeled total. Hampton Event, Wellington Assoc, and Gulford Transportation also meet SLF PAC on other URLs. Those are different keys sharing a committee ID.

About $96,741,278 of Doctor-coded money ($111,741,528 − $15,000,250) went to other committees. Eighty-seven percent of the string is not this Super PAC. Describing Doctor as an SLF PAC employer would overstate the join. The accurate sentence is that $15,000,250 of a $111,741,528 grouping, on 514 lines, is coded to C00571703.

514 lines averaging about $29,183

Five hundred fourteen itemized contributions totaling $15,000,250 average about $29,183 per line. That mean is lower than several other SLF PAC employer joins in this series, which only shows that a vague title spreads across many recipients. Unique donors are not listed. PHYSICIAN, MD, and hospital names are other keys.

Because DOCTOR is generic, pediatricians, dentists who typed the word loosely, and non-clinicians who used it as a courtesy title can share the grouping. The $111,741,528 total is not a census of U.S. physician political giving. It is one word as filed.

SLF PAC as a minority destination for Doctor

C00571703’s independent expenditures are outside $15,000,250. Other employers giving to SLF PAC appear on the committee hub. Adding Doctor’s $15,000,250 to another employer’s SLF PAC cell on this page would double-count committee receipts.

The industry hub for Doctor is the place to see the other 87% of the $111,741,528. This tie exists so the 13% slice has a URL instead of being inferred from a Super PAC’s donor list.

A title is not Medicare and not a hospital award

FEC individual receipts do not fund CMS, NIH, or hospital USAspending awards. Correlation of doctor across a biography and a grant file is not causation. This page offers no medical advice and no ranking of committees.

Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. Cite $15,000,250, 514 contributions, $111,741,528, and C00571703. Keep DOCTOR labeled as filer text, not as a medical-board roster.

Linked hubs

The Doctor industry page holds the $111,741,528 employer total and the committees that received the other 87%. The SLF PAC page holds C00571703 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs, including other occupation-like strings and other SLF PAC employer joins, without mixing independent expenditures into this 514-line cell.

13.4 percent is $15,000,250 of $111,741,528. The leftover $96,741,278 is Doctor-coded money on other committees—the largest remainder among SLF PAC joins in this slice. 514 lines at about $29,183 each are a modest mean on a huge, vague title. PHYSICIAN and MD are other keys.

Hampton Event, Wellington Assoc, and Gulford Transportation also meet C00571703. Adding Doctor’s $15,000,250 to those cells on this page would double-count SLF PAC. Unique donors are not listed. Independent expenditures are outside the cell.

Cite FEC.gov for $15,000,250, 514 contributions, $111,741,528, and C00571703. Do not treat 13.4% as a poll of licensed physicians or as CMS, NIH, or hospital awards. This page offers no medical advice. DOCTOR remains occupation-like filer text. The industry hub holds the other share of the grouping.

Researchers who need names behind the 514 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $15,000,250 coded to DOCTOR and received by SLF PAC (C00571703), against an employer grouping of $111,741,528. About 13% of that grouping is here; $96,741,278 is not. Dollars per line average about $29,183. That ratio is arithmetic on the packet facts, not a typical gift and not a legal finding. Unitemized receipts, independent expenditures, and USAspending awards remain outside the join. Cite FEC.gov. A medical title is a minority slice of its own grouping.

Questions

How much did Doctor-coded donors give SLF PAC?
FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $15,000,250 coded to the Doctor employer grouping and received by SLF PAC (C00571703). That join covers 514 contributions. The broader Doctor employer total across all committees is $111,741,528. These figures are not independent expenditures.
Is this all physicians’ giving to SLF PAC?
No. DOCTOR is a self-reported string, often an occupation placeholder. PHYSICIAN, MD, and hospital employers are other keys. This page does not verify licensure. It reports the labeled join to committee C00571703 from itemized individual contributions only.
What share of Doctor FEC money went to SLF PAC?
About 13% of the $111,741,528 Doctor employer total is in this join: $15,000,250 to SLF PAC. About $96,741,278 went to other committees. That minority share describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that doctors as a class preferred this PAC.
Does this include SLF PAC independent expenditures?
No. The source is FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Independent expenditures and operating costs are outside this join. Use the C00571703 committee hub for other receipt and spending types not in this employer filter.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.