Investment Banker political contributions from Connecticut

Investment Banker in Connecticut as a slice of $30,023,152

Occupation INVESTMENT BANKER and donor state CT produce $1,813,399, 1,343 contributions, and 221 donors. The occupation hub is $30,023,152, 31,912 contributions, and 3,779 donors. Connecticut’s dollar share is about 6%; contribution share about 4% (1,343 of 31,912); donor share about 6% (221 of 3,779).

Dollar share and donor share match; contribution share runs a little lower. The Connecticut-coded slice is somewhat heavier per row than the national Investment Banker mix. New Jersey’s Investment Banker join has a different mix of dollars, contributions, and donors. Two packets, not a combined New York-metro total.

Two hundred twenty-one Connecticut donors produced 1,343 contributions, about six itemized rows per donor in this join, versus about eight rows per donor nationally (31,912 contributions from 3,779 donors). Connecticut holds about 6% of the $30,023,152 on both dollars and donors. New Jersey’s parallel tie has a different row mix on the same occupation string.

Investment Banker versus Banker, Finance, and Investment Manager

INVESTMENT BANKER is the longer title. BANKER is a separate occupation hub with its own national total and an Illinois tie in this slice. Connecticut’s Finance and Investment Manager joins use other strings. Those use other strings. A Stamford filer who wrote BANKER is not in this $1,813,399.

Three thousand seven hundred seventy-nine donors produced 31,912 contributions nationwide. This page locates the Connecticut overlap of the INVESTMENT BANKER bucket only.

Connecticut as donor state

Two hundred twenty-one Connecticut donors produced 1,343 contributions totaling $1,813,399. Donor state CT is the address on the record, not proof of a Connecticut-based desk, and not a limit to Connecticut candidates.

The Connecticut campaign-finance hub includes every occupation coded to CT. This join is only INVESTMENT BANKER.

Connecticut’s state hub includes Finance and Investment Manager ties. INVESTMENT BANKER is only this filter. The occupation hub without Connecticut still holds about 94% of the $30,023,152. BANKER without the adjective is a different national hub.

Caveats

This page does not measure deal volume, does not identify banks, and does not claim that Investment Banker-coded money caused any electoral result. Occupation plus state is a bookkeeping join. Correlation is not causation. These figures are itemized individual contributions, not bank PAC or treasury spending.

Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov is the source. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

These are itemized individual contributions, not bank PAC or treasury spending. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. Deal volume is not in these six numbers. Donor state CT is not recipient geography. Correlation is not causation.

Connecticut’s $1,813,399 is the INVESTMENT BANKER-and-CT overlap only, not a statewide banking total and not a sum with Finance-coded receipts.

Why this Investment Banker page is not a restatement of Connecticut

Subtract the Connecticut dollars on this page from the national Investment Banker occupation total and the difference is the amount still coded Investment Banker in every other state combined. That remainder has no row-by-row breakdown here because those states are other ties. The occupation internal link holds the unlabeled-by-state total; the state internal link holds every occupation with this state code; the occupations index and the ties index place this pair among other joins built the same way.

A unique-donor count is not a person-level audit. The FEC aggregate can merge similar names or split one person who filed under variants. A contribution count can be many small itemized rows. A dollar total can hide that skew. Keeping all three figures on the same page is the point of the join: quoting only the Connecticut dollars, or only the Investment Banker national total, drops a key.

This relationship is not a forecast and not a ranking of influence. Occupation does not cause contributions, and donor state does not cause recipient geography. Public records, two fields, one intersection. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; occupation labels are filer-entered.

Related hubs

Investment Banker donations holds the $30,023,152 national occupation total. Connecticut campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields.

Questions

How much have Investment Banker donors in Connecticut given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Investment Banker and state Connecticut total $1,813,399, from 1,343 contributions and 221 donors. Nationwide, Investment Banker-coded receipts are $30,023,152 from 31,912 contributions and 3,779 donors. Connecticut is about 6% of those dollars.

Is Investment Banker the same as Banker or Investment Manager?

No. INVESTMENT BANKER, BANKER, and INVESTMENT MANAGER are different occupation strings. Connecticut has separate Finance and Investment Manager ties. This page’s 221 donors and $1,813,399 are INVESTMENT BANKER-and-CT only.

How does Connecticut compare with New Jersey on this label?

Connecticut’s join is $1,813,399 from 221 donors and 1,343 contributions. New Jersey has a separate Investment Banker tie; its figures are not this packet’s facts. Both cut the same $30,023,152 occupation total. They are not a combined metro figure and not a ranking of banks.

Does this money go to Connecticut candidates?

Not necessarily. Donor state is Connecticut. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee. This page does not allocate the $1,813,399 by office or by in-state versus out-of-state campaigns.