Marketing donations in the 2014 FEC cycle

Marketing × 2014

MARKETING plus cycle 2014 equals $799,436. That figure is the harvested sum of itemized individual contributions in which the occupation field matched this string and the two-year federal election cycle was 2014. Marketing director, CMO, marketing manager, and advertising are other keys if those words appear. This join does not recode the label into an AMA census, a CMO survey, or an agency headcount. Other cycle amounts are not fields in this packet.

Parent hubs: Marketing donations at /occupations/marketing/ and the 2014 election cycle at /election-cycles/2014/. All occupations lists neighboring titles. All FEC ties keeps each occupation-year cell on its own path so a reader can move without mixing $799,436 into another year or another string. Do not add those parent pages into this cell.

Party, committee, and employer breakdowns for Marketing in 2014 are not fields in this packet. Do not infer a partisan split from $799,436. In-house versus agency versus product marketing is unpublished for Marketing in 2014. The occupation page and the 2014 cycle page are the next clicks for named committees.

MARKETING in a midterm window

$29.9 million ($29,904,769) belongs to the exact string MARKETING across harvested cycles. It is not an AMA census, a CMO survey, or an agency headcount. People who wrote nearby wording — marketing director, CMO, marketing manager, and advertising — sit in other rows if the characters differ. The 2014 slice is 2.7% of that title bucket. Share of MARKETING is not share of all 2014 receipts.

Amended individual contribution reports can move $799,436. A later harvest of the same occupation string can move $29,904,769. Rewrite only the sentence whose source moved. Live Marketing donations and the live 2014 election cycle pages are the tables; this prose is a packet snapshot. Itemized individual contributions are the only receipt class in this cell. Unitemized gifts below the itemization threshold, in-kind goods, and bundled contributions without this occupation string are outside $799,436.

994 marketing receipts in 2014

442 donors and 994 receipts — about 2.2 lines per donor. Mean per receipt about $804; mean per donor about $1,809. Those ratios are arithmetic on two harvested integers. They are not medians, not typical gifts, and not a claim about income. 442 donors makes this a mid-size occupation-cycle cell. No median is published in this packet.

Repeat gifts add receipts. 994 is a line count, not 442 one-time gifts; about two lines per donor, which is consistent with repeat gifts inside the same two-year window. In-house versus agency versus product marketing is not encoded in the occupation string. Neither figure is a headcount of everyone who works in the field named by MARKETING. People who left occupation blank, used a nearby spelling, or listed a more specific title are not in $799,436.

2014 cell versus the 2010 marketing join

Cite $799,436 as Marketing in 2014. Cite $29,904,769 as this title’s occupation total. Do not add advertising-industry PAC filings to either figure. Those filings are committee reports. Mixing PAC spending with $799,436 would blend FEC tables. All occupations lists neighboring titles so a searcher can open the other string’s cycle cell rather than rescale 2.7%.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by self-reported occupation and election cycle. This join does not recode MARKETING into a Bureau of Labor Statistics title, a NAICS code, or a license class. If a researcher needs those crosswalks, they start from the raw string. Correlation is not causation: a midterm-year total does not prove the occupation’s motives, and it does not attach these gifts to any federal spending dataset.

How to cite marketing money in 2014

A clean footnote names occupation MARKETING, election cycle 2014, $799,436 in itemized individual contributions, 994 receipts, and 442 donors on FEC.gov. Keep the itemized word. Mean dollars remain about $804 per line and $1,809 per donor in the cell. If the live Marketing donations overlay has refreshed, quote the overlay. Do not treat 994 as unique workers in the trade.

This URL exists because two filters meet. Marketing donations rolls every cycle into one MARKETING running total. The 2014 election cycle rolls every occupation into one 2014 total. Only the Marketing × 2014 overlay applies both filters, which is why this page cites 994 receipts and $799,436. All FEC ties is the directory of other occupation-cycle cells.

Questions

How much did marketing filers donate in 2014?

Filers who listed Marketing itemized $799,436 in FEC individual contributions in 2014, from 994 receipts and 442 donors. That is 2.7% of $29,904,769 under MARKETING. Marketing director, CMO, marketing manager, and advertising are other keys when those are the words on the form. Figures are FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates.

Does this include advertising-industry PACs?

No. $799,436 is individual contributions tagged Marketing in 2014. Advertising-industry PAC filings file as committees. Mixing PAC spending with $799,436 would blend FEC tables. See Marketing donations or the 2014 election cycle hub for committee names. Marketing in 2014 is $799,436 on 994 receipts from 442 donors.

Are marketing labels standardized on FEC forms?

No. FEC.gov stores the occupation as typed. This join uses MARKETING. Marketing director, CMO, marketing manager, and advertising are other keys when those characters appear. LobbyVault does not recode the string into an AMA census, a CMO survey, or an agency headcount. Cite $799,436 for this title in 2014 on 994 receipts from 442 donors.

What two tables meet on this page?

Marketing donations ($29.9 million for the string) and the 2014 election cycle. The overlap is $799,436 from 994 receipts and 442 donors. All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle cells. All occupations lists neighboring titles. Figures are FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates for Marketing in 2014.