Marketing political contributions from Michigan

Marketing and Michigan on the same national stamp

Occupation MARKETING and donor state MI produce $699,381, 1,514 contributions, and 85 donors. The occupation hub is $29,904,769, 133,163 contributions, and 5,619 donors. Dollar, contribution, and donor shares cluster within a few points (2.3%, 1.1%, 1.5%). Michigan tracks the national Marketing mix rather than concentrating one of the three measures. Michigan Marketing dollar share sits above contribution share on the same one-word stamp as Colorado, with far fewer rows.

Marketing is a one-word workplace stamp as typed, Michigan filter. Nearby strings — MARKETING DIRECTOR, MARKETING MANAGER, SALES, and ADVERTISING — sit in other occupation hubs when filers used those words. Do not stack those dollar figures onto $699,381 or $29,904,769. Do not add Colorado Marketing dollars to this Michigan cell; those are a different state filter on the same occupation string.

Eighty-five Michigan donors produced 1,514 contributions, about 17.8 itemized rows per donor in this join, versus about 23.7 rows per donor nationally (133,163 contributions from 5,619 donors). Mean dollars per donor in this Michigan cell are about $8,228, versus about $5,322 across the occupation. Those ratios are arithmetic on the six packet numbers, not a gift-size ranking of influence.

MARKETING as the same stamp, Michigan filter

MARKETING is filer-entered. The FEC file does not verify a marketing-director seat or a named-employer shop. The national grouping is 5,619 donors, 133,163 contributions, and $29,904,769.

133,163 contributions from 5,619 donors shows repeat itemization nationwide. Michigan’s 1,514 contributions from 85 donors is the MI-coded piece. This page does not split those rows by cycle, employer, or recipient committee. It locates how much of the labeled money is also coded to Michigan.

Eighty-five Michigan donors on the join

Eighty-five Michigan donors produced 1,514 contributions totaling $699,381. Donor state MI is the address on the record, not proof of a Michigan professional license, and not a limit to Michigan candidates. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee.

The Michigan campaign-finance hub includes every occupation coded to MI. This join is only MARKETING. Subtract $699,381 from $29,904,769 and $29,205,388 remains coded Marketing in every other state combined (131,649 contributions, 5,534 donors). That remainder has no row-by-row breakdown here because those states are other ties.

Do not stack Colorado Marketing onto this page

This page does not measure marketing output, does not rank firms, and does not claim that Marketing-coded money caused any electoral result. Occupation plus state is a bookkeeping join. Correlation is not causation. Not a Michigan advertising-agency census, not a NAICS recode, and not a brand-team roster.

Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov is the source. Occupation labels are filer-entered. Itemized individual contributions only. Firm names, license numbers, and employer strings are not in these six numbers. Donor state MI is not recipient geography.

Marketing strings that stay on other hubs

A unique-donor count is not a person-level audit. The FEC aggregate can merge similar names or split one person who filed under variants. A contribution count can be many small itemized rows. A dollar total can hide that skew. Keeping $699,381, 1,514 contributions, and 85 donors on the same page is the point of the join: quoting only the Michigan dollars, or only the Marketing national total, drops a key.

Marketing donations holds the $29,904,769 national occupation total. Michigan campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields. MARKETING DIRECTOR, MARKETING MANAGER, SALES, is a different occupation string if a filer used it.

This relationship is not a forecast and not a ranking of influence. Occupation does not cause contributions, and donor state does not cause recipient geography. Public records, two fields, one intersection. FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates; occupation labels are filer-entered. Do not add Colorado Marketing dollars to this Michigan cell; those are a different state filter on the same occupation string.

Related FEC tables for Marketing and Michigan

Marketing donations holds the $29,904,769 national occupation total. Michigan campaign finance holds the state’s itemized individual activity across occupations. All occupations and all FEC ties collect other occupation-state pairs from the same two fields.

Questions

How much have Marketing donors in Michigan given?

FEC itemized individual contributions from donors listing occupation Marketing and state Michigan total $699,381, from 1,514 contributions and 85 donors. Nationwide, Marketing-coded receipts are $29,904,769 from 133,163 contributions and 5,619 donors. Michigan is 2.3% of those dollars.

Does Marketing mean Michigan advertising agencies?

Occupation is MARKETING and state is MI. Eighty-five Michigan donors produced 1,514 contributions. Marketing Director and Sales are other occupation keys. This Michigan join is not the Colorado Marketing tie; do not add those state totals here. The FEC file does not recode those compounds into MARKETING.

What share of Marketing FEC money is from Michigan?

2.3% of the $29,904,769 occupation total is in this Michigan join ($699,381). Michigan also accounts for 1.1% of contributions (1,514 of 133,163) and 1.5% of donors (85 of 5,619). Those three shares are computed from the packet facts only.

Does this money go to Michigan candidates?

Not necessarily. Donor state is Michigan. Recipients can be any FEC-filing committee. This page does not allocate the $699,381 by office or by in-state versus out-of-state campaigns. Independent expenditures are omitted. FEC.gov itemized individual contributions; occupation labels are filer-entered.