Price Waterhouse and the 2010 FEC election cycle

Price Waterhouse crossed with 2010

Employer groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Price Waterhouse and 2010 — sum to $380,483. 454 itemized contributions and 198 unique donors produced it. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables. This page joins the employer grouping Price Waterhouse to cycle 2010; it is not a restatement of either hub alone.

Neither the Price Waterhouse hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. 198 unique donors and 454 lines in 2010 sit under the stored string PRICE WATERHOUSE. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, PWC, PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP, and COOPERS AND LYBRAND stay on their own keys if filers used them. Federal audit, consulting, or other professional-services USAspending rows are a different file and are not funded by these itemized gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards.

5.5% of the Price Waterhouse roll

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $6,975,521 ($7 million). The 2010 slice of $380,483 is about 5.5% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 94.5%, or $6,595,038. Treating 2010 as the Price Waterhouse FEC story would ignore that remainder. Quote $380,483 when the sentence is about 2010. Quote $6,975,521 when the sentence is about the grouping across cycles. Do not add those two dollar figures; the first is already inside the second.

Treat $6,975,521 as the denominator for the 5.5% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $6,975,521. 5.5% is $380,483 divided by $6,975,521. Rounding to $380,483 and $7 million does not create extra facts. Use exact integers in a table. Use the rounded forms only as headlines of those same integers.

454 contributions from 198 donors

Dividing $380,483 by 454 contributions yields about $838 per itemized gift. Dividing by 198 donors yields about $1,922 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 2.3. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count faster than the donor count. The overlay for Price Waterhouse 2010 holds the rows.

198 unique donors are contributor identities, not a headcount of employees, licensees, or members. Retirees and household members who reuse a workplace or title can appear. Unitemized gifts never appear in $380,483. State-office campaigns never enter this cell. A later amendment can restate a large transfer while most of the 454 small lines stay put. After quarterly filings, reread the live overlay. If that hub and this snapshot disagree, FEC.gov controls.

2010 as the cycle dimension

The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer or occupation for that window. Price Waterhouse is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer grouping filter and Price Waterhouse to drop the year. FEC cycle 2010 covers 2009–2010. A gift dated in the odd year and a gift dated in the even year can share the $380,483 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday.

That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 454 contributions, the 198 unique donors, and the 5.5% share of $6,975,521. Comparing Price Waterhouse in 2010 to another grouping requires that other grouping’s cycle hub. This packet has one grouping and one cycle.

Limits of the Price Waterhouse × 2010 join

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $380,483. Federal audit, consulting, or other professional-services USAspending rows are different datasets. Sharing an employer or occupation string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. Correlation between a stored string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 198 donors, and 454 contributions.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, PWC, PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP, and COOPERS AND LYBRAND are other keys if stored separately. LobbyVault does not merge neighboring spellings into PRICE WATERHOUSE. The key is not a surviving PwC partnership census, not a pre-merger firm roster, and not a PwC PAC. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. A ranking of industries for 2010 is a different page — the 2010 election-cycle index — not a homemade sort of this file.

Citing Price Waterhouse and 2010 together

Start with $380,483, then Price Waterhouse 2010 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Price Waterhouse, 2010, $380,483, 454 contributions, 198 donors, 5.5% of $6,975,521, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string.

The 5.5% share, the 198 donors count, and the $838 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling string and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control. Do not print a 2010 share of US politics from $380,483. The denominator for 5.5% is $6,975,521, the Price Waterhouse grouping in this extract, not every itemized dollar on FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Price Waterhouse donors give in 2010?

FEC.gov aggregates show $380,483 in itemized individual contributions for the Price Waterhouse grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 454 contributions and 198 donors. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $6,975,521 all-cycle figure. Cite FEC.gov for the Price Waterhouse × 2010 join.

What share of Price Waterhouse FEC money is 2010?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $6,975,521. The 2010 cell of $380,483 is about 5.5% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 94.5% ($6,595,038) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Price Waterhouse hub holds other cycles.

Is this Price Waterhouse’s PAC or an official account?

No. $380,483 is itemized individual receipts whose employer or occupation text grouped to Price Waterhouse. Committee PAC filings and official organization accounts sit outside this rollup. The key is not a surviving PwC partnership census, not a pre-merger firm roster, and not a PwC PAC. Filings remain on FEC.gov.

Where is the overlay for the Price Waterhouse 2010 join?

Open Price Waterhouse 2010 for the cycle overlay, Price Waterhouse for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows.