Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp contributions received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I

Unspaced PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP meeting PAC I

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP is the grouped employer key as one concatenated word plus LLP. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I is committee C00107235. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $6,481,795 figure is the intersection. The Roman numeral I is part of the registered PAC name in this packet; it is not a ranking and not a cycle number.

Filers who typed PWC, PwC, PRICE WATERHOUSE, or PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS without LLP may sit in other keys if stored separately. This join does not merge those brand shortenings into the unspaced LLP string. Connected-PAC name overlap is expected; the $8,306,870 industry hub is still a different list.

Fifteen thousand two hundred thirty-seven contributions is a high-volume professional-services PAC file. Line count is not a partner census.

Seventy-eight percent of the PwC LLP grouping

The PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP grouping shows $8,306,870 in itemized individual money. The PAC I cell is $6,481,795, or about 78% of that total. About 22% of LLP-coded receipts went to other committees. Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub.

A 78% share is concentrated overlap, similar in shape to the KPMG LLP connected-PAC join in this slice, but the dollars, line counts, and committee IDs are different. Do not add the two firms together.

15,237 contributions and a $425 mean

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I received $6,481,795 from PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP-coded receipts across 15,237 contributions. Dividing dollars by gifts gives about $425 per contribution. That mean is consistent with repeated itemized PAC gifts rather than a handful of seven-figure checks. The packet does not publish a median or a partner-versus-staff split.

The committee overlay for C00107235 also includes receipts whose employer field did not group to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP. Independent expenditures, if any, are outside this source note.

Accounting-firm strings and federal awards

PwC entities appear in federal contracting as well as FEC filings. USAspending obligations are not these PAC gifts. This join does not claim that PAC I contributions funded federal work, or that federal work funded PAC contributions. Two datasets, one unspaced legal name.

The employer field can lag a retirement or a secondment. Correlation between an LLP employer string and a connected PAC is a reporting pattern, not causation of procurement outcomes.

Hubs that keep PAC I from becoming all of PwC

The Pricewaterhousecoopers Llp industry page keeps the $8,306,870 grouping and the other committees that received the remaining 22%. The PAC I page keeps C00107235. All industries ranks PWC, KPMG LLP, and other accounting keys separately. All FEC ties lists neighboring cells so this 78% overlap is not mistaken for independent expenditures.

The leftover 22% of $8,306,870 is PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP-coded money that did not go to PAC I. PWC and PwC as short keys, if stored, are not in the 78% share. About $425 per contribution is $6,481,795 divided by 15,237. The Roman numeral I is registered text on C00107235, not a rank against KPMG's PAC and not a cycle number.

Unspaced LLP versus short PwC keys, PAC I versus other PwC IDs

The accurate citation is $6,481,795 of $8,306,870 grouped to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235) across 15,237 itemized contributions, about 78%. It does not include PWC-only rows. A COMMITTEE II, if it exists under another ID, is not this cell.

Unitemized gifts are omitted. Independent expenditures are omitted. USAspending audit and consulting awards that mention PwC are omitted. Repeat givers raise 15,237 above any unique-person figure the packet does not publish. Do not add this cell to the KPMG LLP connected-PAC join; different firms, different IDs, different denominators. All industries is where those LLP keys sit side by side. Keep the unspaced LLP string in the citation so a PWC short key, if indexed, remains separate. The 15,237-line count belongs next to $6,481,795 and the 78% share of $8,306,870. C00107235 is PAC I only. Unitemized gifts stay omitted. Do not add the KPMG LLP cell.

Questions

How much did PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP-coded donors give PwC PAC I?

FEC.gov aggregates show $6,481,795 in itemized individual contributions grouped to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That join covers 15,237 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $8,306,870. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of that LLP grouping went to PAC I?

About 78% of the $8,306,870 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP total is in this join: $6,481,795 to C00107235. The leftover share went to other committees. A high percentage describes overlap, not a finding that the partnership directed every gift.

Does this include people who listed only PwC or PWC?

Only if the grouped employer text is PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP. Short brand names are other keys if stored separately. This page does not recode those variants into the $6,481,795. Figures are limited to the labeled join.

What does the I in COMMITTEE I mean?

The packet stores PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I as the committee name for C00107235. This page does not treat I as a cycle or a rank. Another PAC with a different numeral, if it exists, would be a different committee ID.