PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I

Unspaced PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP meeting PAC I

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP is the grouped employer key as one concatenated word plus LLP. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I is committee C00107235. This page reports itemized individual gifts that carried both labels. The $6,481,795 figure is the intersection. The Roman numeral I is part of the registered PAC name in this packet; it is not a ranking and not a cycle number.

Filers who typed PWC, PwC, PRICE WATERHOUSE, or PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS without LLP may sit in other keys if stored separately. This join does not merge those brand shortenings into the unspaced LLP string. Connected-PAC name overlap is expected; the $8,306,870 industry hub is still a different list.

Fifteen thousand two hundred thirty-seven contributions is a high-volume professional-services PAC file. Line count is not a partner census.

Seventy-eight percent of the PwC LLP grouping

The PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP grouping shows $8,306,870 in itemized individual money. The PAC I cell is $6,481,795, or about 78% of that total. About 22% of LLP-coded receipts went to other committees. Those leftover dollars are on the industry hub.

A 78% share is concentrated overlap, similar in shape to the KPMG LLP connected-PAC join in this slice, but the dollars, line counts, and committee IDs are different. Do not add the two firms together.

Questions

How much did PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP-coded donors give PwC PAC I?

FEC.gov aggregates show $6,481,795 in itemized individual contributions grouped to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That join covers 15,237 contributions. The employer grouping across all committees is $8,306,870. These figures are not independent expenditures.

What share of that LLP grouping went to PAC I?

About 78% of the $8,306,870 PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP total is in this join: $6,481,795 to C00107235. The leftover share went to other committees. A high percentage describes overlap, not a finding that the partnership directed every gift.

Does this include people who listed only PwC or PWC?

Only if the grouped employer text is PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP. Short brand names are other keys if stored separately. This page does not recode those variants into the $6,481,795. Figures are limited to the labeled join.

What does the I in COMMITTEE I mean?

The packet stores PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I as the committee name for C00107235. This page does not treat I as a cycle or a rank. Another PAC with a different numeral, if it exists, would be a different committee ID.