Skip to main content
← All data ties

PricewaterhouseCoopers contributions received by PwC PAC I

$2,210,350 in itemized individual contributions is the join between the PricewaterhouseCoopers grouping and PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That cell covers 6,571 contributions. The grouping totals $3,938,710; this committee is 56.1% of that labeled book. It is not a claim that PricewaterhouseCoopers wrote the checks from a treasury, and it is not independent-expenditure spending.

Key figures

  • PwC PAC I received $2,210,350 from PricewaterhouseCoopers-coded individual contributions across 6,571 itemized gifts.
  • The PricewaterhouseCoopers grouping totals $3,938,710, so this committee accounts for about 56.1% of that labeled money.
  • 6,571 lines average about $336 each; that mean is arithmetic on the packet, not a typical small gift.
  • PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS is FEC stored text, not a certified NAICS sector or unique-donor census.
  • Figures are FEC itemized individual contributions, not independent expenditures or USAspending awards.

6,571 itemized gifts totaling $2,210,350 into PwC PAC I

PricewaterhouseCoopers is the grouped employer or occupation key. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I is committee C00107235. This page is the overlap: itemized individual gifts whose field grouped to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and whose recipient is that committee. The $2,210,350 figure is the intersection.

6,571 contributions averaging about $336 ($2,210,350 ÷ 6,571) describe a high-volume itemized book (typical of many small repeat receipts) with a $336 mean. The packet does not name the 6,571 filers or say whether they are one household repeating. A line count is a filing pattern, not a unique-donor census.

The join exists so the industry hub ($3,938,710) and the committee hub are not treated as the same list. C00107235 is the FEC committee ID on this URL. Independent expenditures stay outside $2,210,350.

PricewaterhouseCoopers as stored FEC employer text

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS is filer-entered text. the spelled-out accounting-firm employer string, distinct from the PWC abbreviation key. PWC, PWC LLP, and PRICE WATERHOUSE can sit on other keys, including a sibling PwC join in this slice. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS sector into $3,938,710.

Occupation strings without this employer key sit on occupation hubs. This URL is PricewaterhouseCoopers × PwC PAC I, an industry-to-committee join, not an industry-to-cycle cell. Open the PricewaterhouseCoopers industry hub for the $3,938,710 employer total and other committees.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235)

C00107235 is disclosed as PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made. The $2,210,350 is PricewaterhouseCoopers-coded individual receipts. Other employers giving to PwC PAC I appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 6,571-line filter.

6,571 lines at about $336 each describe the cell arithmetic. That mean is $2,210,350 divided by 6,571. It is not a typical gift, not a limit, and not a payroll calendar. It does not identify who directed the gifts or whether PricewaterhouseCoopers as an entity participated.

Fifty-six percent of the PricewaterhouseCoopers grouping

About 56.1% of $3,938,710 is $2,210,350 to PwC PAC I. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that PricewaterhouseCoopers as an entity directed the gifts. Substantial overlap still leaves a remainder on other committees that stored the same grouping.

The leftover $1,728,360 (43.9% of $3,938,710) went to other committees under the same PricewaterhouseCoopers grouping, or sits outside this recipient filter. The PricewaterhouseCoopers industry hub holds that remainder. The PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I page holds receipts whose employer field did not group to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS.

A spelled-out PwC name is not a GSA schedule award

Audit and consulting USAspending awards under PricewaterhouseCoopers names, if any exist, are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $2,210,350 in itemized gifts funded federal work, or that federal work funded the gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Two datasets can share a name without sharing a payment trail.

Cite $2,210,350, 6,571 contributions, $3,938,710, and C00107235. Keep both sides named: PricewaterhouseCoopers as grouped text, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear.

Corporate treasury contributions, if any exist on other schedules, are not in these facts. Open the PricewaterhouseCoopers industry hub for the leftover $1,728,360 (43.9%) on other committees.

How to cite this PricewaterhouseCoopers × PwC PAC I join

The PricewaterhouseCoopers industry page holds the $3,938,710 grouping and the committees that received the other 43.9%. The PwC PAC I page holds C00107235 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this 6,571-line cell.

Researchers who need names behind the 6,571 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $2,210,350 coded to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235), against a grouping of $3,938,710. About 56.1% of that grouping is here; $1,728,360 is not. Dollars per line average about $336.

Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees with $2,210,350, 6,571, or C00107235, the overlay and FEC.gov control. Source: FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.

Questions

How much did PricewaterhouseCoopers donors give PwC PAC I?
FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $2,210,350 coded to the PricewaterhouseCoopers grouping and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That join covers 6,571 contributions. The broader grouping across all committees is $3,938,710. These figures are not independent expenditures.
Should I add this join to the PWC abbreviation join?
Only if you are deliberately combining two stored keys. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and PWC are separate groupings with separate industry totals. Each join to C00107235 is its own cell. Adding them without a method double-counts nothing automatically—they are different filters.
What share of PricewaterhouseCoopers FEC money went to this committee?
About 56.1% of the $3,938,710 PricewaterhouseCoopers total is in this join: $2,210,350 to PwC PAC I. About $1,728,360 went to other committees. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the labeled entity directed the gifts.
Why does the packet list 6,571 contributions?
The packet lists 6,571 itemized contribution lines totaling $2,210,350, about $336 per line. That is a receipt count, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are not in this join. Use the C00107235 hub for other receipt types.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.