Property Management money in the 2008 FEC cycle

Property Management as occupation, 2008 as the cycle

This cell is Property Management money inside 2008, not Property Management money forever and not 2008 money from every occupation. FEC.gov puts $325,853 at that crossing, from 424 itemized contributions and 207 donors. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT in 2008 is a two-word function phrase used as occupation, not the person-title PROPERTY MANAGER. Those remain separate keys.

The string PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is filer-entered. Neighboring labels PROPERTY MANAGER, REAL ESTATE, and LANDLORD are other pages. This file does not invent donor names beyond the 207 count, recipient committees, or dollar amounts beyond the packet.

Readers comparing hubs should remember the missing key. The Property Management hub lacks the 2008 filter as its only number. The 2008 hub lacks Property Management as its only occupation. This page has both, totaling $325,853.

A function noun, not a person-title Property Manager

A 2014 Property Management cell uses the same occupation total. Do not add that midterm figure to this 2008 presidential cut. 424 itemized lines from 207 unique donors is about 2.0 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $769; mean per donor about $1,574. Those derived figures use only packet facts. No median, no party split, and no recipient ranking is available here. A mean of $769 per itemized line and $1,574 per donor can hide a few large receipts.

207 donors in a presidential-year window

The 2008 election cycle hub holds itemized individual receipts for every occupation coded to that even-year window. This tie keeps only Property Management. $325,853 is therefore not a cycle-wide total. FEC.gov labels this even-year federal window 2008. A presidential-year FEC window. It is not a 2010 midterm filter and not a later presidential cycle.

424 itemized lines from 207 unique donors is about 2.0 receipts per donor. Mean per line about $769; mean per donor about $1,574. About 2.0 itemized rows per donor is a filing ratio. The packet has no median, no party split, and no employer table. Unitemized federal gifts never enter $325,853. Hundreds of donor keys and hundreds of lines is a mid-scale function-phrase cell in a presidential year.

What Property Management dollars in 2008 are not

Matching Property Management with 2008 does not measure influence, does not assign party, and does not say Property Management donors caused an electoral result. Correlation between an occupation string and a cycle is not causation. The table is also not a CAM-license census, a landlord-permit file, or a real-estate PAC.

Itemized individual contributions from FEC.gov only. Independent expenditures, unitemized gifts, and state-office campaigns are excluded. Occupation labels are filer-entered. A 2014 Property Management cell uses the same occupation total. Do not add that midterm figure to this 2008 presidential cut. Campaign gifts and federal awards remain separate public records. This page does not claim that $325,853 funded USAspending obligations.

How to cite Property Management × 2008

A complete claim names Property Management and 2008, then $325,853, 424 contributions, 207 donors, and 5.3% of $6,103,031, source FEC.gov. Do not convert 207 keys into licensed or employed practitioners. Do not fold independent expenditures or USAspending awards into the cell. Keep both sides of the name—Property Management and 2008—whenever the dollars are quoted. Mean gift $769 and mean per donor $1,574 travel with those counts; they do not travel with a licensing board.

Occupation hub, 2008 hub, and the 2014 sibling cell

Property Management donations holds the $6,103,031 occupation total. The 2008 election cycle page holds every occupation in that window, not only Property Management. All occupations places PROPERTY MANAGEMENT beside other titles without merging sibling strings (PROPERTY MANAGER, REAL ESTATE, and LANDLORD). All FEC ties lists other occupation-cycle pairs so $325,853 is not added to a different year. Those four internal links are the only hrefs this copy may use.

The occupation hub still holds $5,777,178 (94.7%) outside 2008. Most of the $6,103,031 roll is not this cycle’s cell. Property manager as a person-title is a different occupation page. This join keeps the noun phrase PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. Gifts per donor in 2008 average about 2.0. That ratio is 424 divided by 207, not a measure of turnout. Quote both keys: Property Management and 2008. Quote the dollars: $325,853. Quote the volume: 424 contributions, 207 donors. Quote the source: FEC.gov.

Questions

How much did Property Management-labeled donors give in 2008?

The Property Management grouping’s 2008 cell is $325,853 in itemized individual contributions, from 424 contributions and 207 donors, per FEC.gov aggregates. That is the occupation-cycle join, not a PAC total and not the $6,103,031 all-cycle occupation total. Occupation labels are filer-entered.

Is Property Management the same as Property Manager?

No. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT is the function noun. PROPERTY MANAGER is a different occupation page if that spelling was stored. The 2008 cycle filter on Property Management is $325,853, 424 contributions, and 207 donors. The occupation total across cycles is $6,103,031.

What share of Property Management FEC money fell in 2008?

About 5.3%. $325,853 divided by $6,103,031 is the 2008 cell’s share of the lifetime occupation bucket. Other cycles hold about 94.7% ($5,777,178) on the occupation hub. See the Property Management occupation hub for other cycles and the 2008 cycle hub for other strings.

Does Property Management 2008 money fund federal awards?

No. These figures are FEC individual contribution aggregates. Federal awards are published by USAspending. This page does not claim that campaign gifts funded those awards. $325,853 is itemized receipts tagged PROPERTY MANAGEMENT in 2008, not an obligation total. Cite the 2008 intersection as $325,853 and 424 contributions from 207 donors, not the $6,103,031 occupation total.