PwC contributions received by PricewaterhouseCoopers PAC I

6,977 itemized gifts totaling $2,960,550 into PwC PAC I

PwC is the grouped employer or occupation key. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I is committee C00107235. This page is the overlap: itemized individual gifts whose field grouped to PWC and whose recipient is that committee. The $2,960,550 figure is the intersection.

6,977 contributions averaging about $424 ($2,960,550 ÷ 6,977) describe a high-volume itemized book (typical of many small repeat receipts) with a $424 mean. The packet does not name the 6,977 filers or say whether they are one household repeating. A line count is a filing pattern, not a unique-donor census.

The join exists so the industry hub ($4,227,791) and the committee hub are not treated as the same list. C00107235 is the FEC committee ID on this URL. Independent expenditures stay outside $2,960,550.

PwC as stored FEC employer text

PWC is filer-entered text. an abbreviated employer string for an accounting firm, not a GAO or GSA audit-contract table. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, PWC LLP, and PRICE WATERHOUSE can sit on other keys, including a sibling join on this slice. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS sector into $4,227,791.

Occupation strings without this employer key sit on occupation hubs. This URL is PwC × PwC PAC I, an industry-to-committee join, not an industry-to-cycle cell. Open the PwC industry hub for the $4,227,791 employer total and other committees.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235)

C00107235 is disclosed as PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made. The $2,960,550 is PwC-coded individual receipts. Other employers giving to PwC PAC I appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 6,977-line filter.

6,977 lines at about $424 each describe the cell arithmetic. That mean is $2,960,550 divided by 6,977. It is not a typical gift, not a limit, and not a payroll calendar. It does not identify who directed the gifts or whether PwC as an entity participated.

Seventy percent of the PwC grouping

About 70.0% of $4,227,791 is $2,960,550 to PwC PAC I. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that PwC as an entity directed the gifts. High overlap with one committee is a reporting pattern, not a finding that the labeled entity allocated political money.

The leftover $1,267,241 (30.0% of $4,227,791) went to other committees under the same PwC grouping, or sits outside this recipient filter. The PwC industry hub holds that remainder. The PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I page holds receipts whose employer field did not group to PWC.

A PwC stub is not a federal audit-contract award

Audit and consulting USAspending awards under PwC-related names, if any exist, are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $2,960,550 in itemized gifts funded federal work, or that federal work funded the gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Two datasets can share a name without sharing a payment trail.

Cite $2,960,550, 6,977 contributions, $4,227,791, and C00107235. Keep both sides named: PwC as grouped text, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear.

Corporate treasury contributions, if any exist on other schedules, are not in these facts. Open the PwC industry hub for the leftover $1,267,241 (30.0%) on other committees.

How to cite this PwC × PwC PAC I join

The PwC industry page holds the $4,227,791 grouping and the committees that received the other 30.0%. The PwC PAC I page holds C00107235 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this 6,977-line cell.

Researchers who need names behind the 6,977 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $2,960,550 coded to PWC and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235), against a grouping of $4,227,791. About 70.0% of that grouping is here; $1,267,241 is not. Dollars per line average about $424.

Live hubs override this snapshot. If the overlay disagrees with $2,960,550, 6,977, or C00107235, the overlay and FEC.gov control. Source: FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.

Questions

How much did PwC donors give PwC PAC I?

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $2,960,550 coded to the PwC grouping and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That join covers 6,977 contributions. The broader grouping across all committees is $4,227,791. These figures are not independent expenditures.

Is PwC the same total as PricewaterhouseCoopers?

No. PWC and PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS are separate grouped keys in this table. Each has its own industry total and its own join to C00107235. Do not add the two joins unless you are explicitly combining keys. Cite FEC.gov for $2,960,550 to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235) from the PwC grouping, across 6,977 itemized contributions.

What share of PwC FEC money went to this committee?

About 70.0% of the $4,227,791 PwC total is in this join: $2,960,550 to PwC PAC I. About $1,267,241 went to other committees. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the labeled entity directed the gifts.

Why does the packet list 6,977 contributions?

The packet lists 6,977 itemized contribution lines totaling $2,960,550, about $424 per line. That is a receipt count, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are not in this join. Use the C00107235 hub for other receipt types.