How much itemized money sits at ROSE ASSOCIATES in 2010?

FEC.gov aggregates show $223,910 in itemized individual contributions for the Rose Associates grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 108 contributions and 9 donors. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $3,943,688 all-cycle figure. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.

How much of the $3.9 million Rose Associates book is 2010?

The grouping’s all-cycle total is $3,943,688. The 2010 cell of $223,910 is about 5.7% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 94.3% ($3,719,778) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Rose Associates hub holds other cycles; the 2010 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.

Are these Rose Associates PAC transfers in 2010?

No. $223,910 is itemized individual contributions whose employer or occupation field grouped to Rose Associates (ROSE ASSOCIATES) in the 2010 cycle. It is not committee disbursements, not independent expenditures, and not a verified employee census. 108 contributions came from 9 donors. Do not invent those names from the grouping label.

Which hub drops the 2010 filter?

Open Rose Associates 2010 for the cycle overlay, Rose Associates for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov controls.

← All data ties

Rose Associates political money — 2010 cycle

The 2010 cycle cell for Rose Associates is $223,910 in itemized individual receipts on FEC.gov. 108 lines from 9 donors sit in that window. Across stored cycles the same grouping totals $3,943,688 ($3.9 million). 2010 is a midterm even-year tag; that calendar word does not explain the dollars.

Key figures

Rose Associates × 2010 is $223,910 in itemized individual contributions.
The cell includes 108 contributions from 9 donors.
2010 is about 5.7% of the grouping’s $3,943,688 all-cycle total.
The label is filer-entered form text (ROSE ASSOCIATES), not a PAC disbursement and not a NAICS total.
FEC gifts and federal award files remain separate datasets.

The join, not the Rose Associates hub

Employer and occupation groupings sit on one axis; election cycles sit on the other. Rows that match both — Rose Associates (ROSE ASSOCIATES) and 2010 — sum to $223,910. 108 itemized contributions and 9 unique donors produced it. The total is not an official organization disbursement and does not name recipients. Independent expenditures and committee transfers live in other FEC tables.

Neither the Rose Associates hub nor the 2010 election cycle hub is this number; each hub drops one of the two keys. ROSE ASSOCIATES is the stored employer string. ROSE ASSOCIATES INC and ROSE ASSOC are other keys. Nine unique donors produced 108 itemized contributions — a concentrated donor count. Do not invent those nine names. Concentration is arithmetic, not a finding of control. LobbyVault does not merge neighboring spellings into $223,910. This URL exists because the two dimensions meet.

2010 as a slice of $3.9 million

The grouping’s stored total across cycles is $3,943,688 ($3.9 million). The 2010 slice of $223,910 is about 5.7% of that running sum. Other even-year windows hold the remaining 94.3% ($3,719,778). Treating 2010 as the Rose Associates FEC story would ignore that remainder.

Treat $3,943,688 as the denominator for the 5.7% share. It is not market capitalization, not revenue, and not proof of a multi-year political program. The industry hub is the year index for this string. This tie keeps 2010 from being folded silently into $3,943,688.

Donor count versus contribution count

Dividing $223,910 by 108 contributions yields about $2,073 per itemized gift. Dividing by 9 donors yields about $24,879 per donor. Contributions per donor average about 12.0. Those means describe the arithmetic on the packet. They are not medians and not a party split.

9 unique donors are contributor identities, not a headcount of employees, members, or licensees. Retirees and household members who reuse a workplace or title can appear. Repeat gifts raise the contribution count faster than the donor count. The overlay for Rose Associates 2010 holds the rows. This packet does not publish donor names; do not invent them.

Reading the 2010 election-cycle hub

The 2010 election cycle hub includes every stored employer for that window. Rose Associates is one cell in that matrix. This packet does not publish a cycle-wide denominator, so no national share is stated. Open the 2010 election cycle to drop the employer filter and Rose Associates to drop the year. 2010 is a midterm even-year window on FEC.gov; that calendar label does not explain $223,910.

Gifts from both years of the two-year FEC window sit in the $223,910 cell because the cycle is a two-year tag, not a single Tuesday. That mechanical fact is easy to forget when a searcher wants an election-night number. The overlay is where dates become visible. This join publishes the cycle total, the 108 contributions, the 9 unique donors, and the 5.7% share of $3,943,688.

Unitemized gifts and other omitted files

Itemized individual receipts are the universe. Unitemized gifts, independent expenditures, and PAC disbursements sit outside $223,910. Federal awards in other databases are different datasets. Sharing an employer string and a calendar year does not turn these gifts into contracts or grants. FEC individual contributions are not USAspending obligations. Do not add $223,910 to federal spending figures.

Correlation between an employer or occupation string and a cycle year is not causation. The records show a text match, a date window, 9 donors, and 108 contributions. ROSE ASSOCIATES is the stored employer string. ROSE ASSOCIATES INC and ROSE ASSOC are other keys. Nine unique donors produced 108 itemized contributions — a concentrated donor count. Do not invent those nine names. Concentration is arithmetic, not a finding of control. Cite the exact stored string ROSE ASSOCIATES crossed with 2010. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages.

Keep Rose Associates and 2010 in one sentence

Start with $223,910, then Rose Associates 2010 for rows, then the industry hub or the 2010 election cycle if a filter needs to come off. Citation template: Rose Associates, 2010, $223,910, 108 contributions, 9 donors, 5.7% of $3,943,688, source FEC.gov. Keep neighboring spellings and occupation titles out of the total unless they grouped to this exact string ROSE ASSOCIATES.

The 5.7% share, the 9-donor count, and the $2,073 mean gift belong to this intersection. Carry them onto a successor label or a sibling occupation word and they stop being facts from this packet. This prose is a packet snapshot. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov and the live overlay control.

Filer-entered text is noisy. ROSE ASSOCIATES is the grouping that survived that noise for this extract. Other punctuation of the same workplace is omitted.

Questions

How much itemized money sits at ROSE ASSOCIATES in 2010?: FEC.gov aggregates show $223,910 in itemized individual contributions for the Rose Associates grouping in the 2010 cycle, across 108 contributions and 9 donors. That sum is not a PAC total and not the $3,943,688 all-cycle figure. Original reports remain on FEC.gov.
How much of the $3.9 million Rose Associates book is 2010?: The grouping’s all-cycle total is $3,943,688. The 2010 cell of $223,910 is about 5.7% of that figure. Other cycles hold the remaining 94.3% ($3,719,778) on the industry hub. The overlay lists itemized rows for this cell; the Rose Associates hub holds other cycles; the 2010 election cycle hub holds other employer strings from the same window.
Are these Rose Associates PAC transfers in 2010?: No. $223,910 is itemized individual contributions whose employer or occupation field grouped to Rose Associates (ROSE ASSOCIATES) in the 2010 cycle. It is not committee disbursements, not independent expenditures, and not a verified employee census. 108 contributions came from 9 donors. Do not invent those names from the grouping label.
Which hub drops the 2010 filter?: Open Rose Associates 2010 for the cycle overlay, Rose Associates for the grouping hub, and the 2010 election cycle for the year without this employer filter. All FEC ties lists other two-dimension pages. This JSON file names the join; the overlay holds the itemized rows. If a later extract disagrees, FEC.gov controls.

FEC.gov individual contribution aggregates by employer/industry grouping and election cycle.