Skip to main content
โ† All data ties

Price Waterhouse contributions received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I

$1,089,719 in itemized individual contributions is the join between the Price Waterhouse grouping and PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That cell covers 8,351 contributions. The grouping totals $6,975,521; this committee is 15.6% of that labeled book. PRICE WATERHOUSE is grouped employer text โ€” not every PwC or PricewaterhouseCoopers spelling, not a partnership treasury, and not independent-expenditure spending.

Key figures

  • PwC PAC received $1,089,719 from Price Waterhouse-coded individual contributions across 8,351 itemized gifts.
  • The Price Waterhouse grouping totals $6,975,521, so this committee accounts for about 15.6% of that labeled money.
  • 8,351 lines average about $130 each; that mean is arithmetic on the packet, not a typical small gift.
  • Figures are FEC itemized individual contributions, not independent expenditures or USAspending awards.

Price Waterhouse meeting PwC PAC

Price Waterhouse is the grouped employer or occupation key. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I is committee C00107235. This page is the overlap: itemized individual gifts whose field grouped to PRICE WATERHOUSE and whose recipient is that committee. The $1,089,719 figure is the intersection.

8,351 contributions averaging about $130 ($1,089,719 รท 8,351) describe a high-volume connected-PAC cell from an accounting-firm employer string, with a three-digit mean gift. Eight thousand three hundred fifty-one lines averaging about $131 are consistent with many modest itemized connected-PAC gifts, without proving partnership draws or unique accountants.

The join exists so the industry hub ($6,975,521) and the committee hub are not treated as the same list. C00107235 is the FEC committee ID on this URL.

PRICE WATERHOUSE as employer text

PRICE WATERHOUSE is filer-entered text. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, PWC, and PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPERS can sit in other keys. This page does not recode a corporate family or a NAICS sector into $6,975,521.

PRICE WATERHOUSE is a stored string that can lag a later PricewaterhouseCoopers legal name. This page does not recode a Big Four family into $6,975,521. Staff who typed ACCOUNTANT without the firm are on occupation hubs.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235)

C00107235 is disclosed as PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I. This page does not list independent expenditures the committee made. The $1,089,719 is Price Waterhouse-coded individual receipts. Other employers giving to PwC PAC appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 8,351-line filter.

C00107235 received $1,089,719 from Price Waterhouse-coded receipts. Other employers giving to PwC PAC appear on the committee hub. Adding them here would break the 8,351-line filter.

Sixteen percent of the Price Waterhouse grouping

About 15.6% of $6,975,521 is $1,089,719 to PwC PAC. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that Price Waterhouse as an entity directed the gifts. A 15.6% connected-PAC share of $6,975,521 means most Price Waterhouse-coded money sat at other committees. Do not treat 15.6% as a firm-wide preference.

The leftover $5,885,802 (84.4% of $6,975,521) went to other committees under the same Price Waterhouse grouping. The industry hub holds that remainder. The PwC PAC page holds receipts whose employer field did not group to PRICE WATERHOUSE.

An accounting name is not an audit-award ledger

Audit, consulting, or other USAspending awards tagged to PwC entities are a different dataset. This join does not claim that $1,089,719 in itemized gifts funded federal work, or that federal work funded the gifts. Campaign contributions are not federal awards. Two datasets can share a name without sharing a payment trail.

Cite $1,089,719, 8,351 contributions, $6,975,521, and C00107235. Keep both sides named: Price Waterhouse as grouped text, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I as recipient. Motive is outside the packet. Unitemized gifts never appear. A connected PAC with a later PwC name is still a recipient key. This page does not prove the partnership directed the gifts.

How to cite this Price Waterhouse ร— PwC PAC join

The Price Waterhouse industry page holds the $6,975,521 grouping and the committees that received the other 84.4%. The PwC PAC page holds C00107235 receipts from every employer. All industries and all FEC ties collect neighboring pairs without mixing independent expenditures into this 8,351-line cell.

Researchers who need names behind the 8,351 contribution lines must leave this prose page for the committee and industry tables. This tie only publishes the overlap: $1,089,719 coded to PRICE WATERHOUSE and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235), against a grouping of $6,975,521. About 15.6% of that grouping is here; $5,885,802 is not. Dollars per line average about $130.

Cite $1,089,719, 8,351 contributions, $6,975,521, and C00107235. Keep both sides named: Price Waterhouse as employer text, PwC PAC as recipient.

Questions

How much did Price Waterhouse-coded donors give PwC PAC?
FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions show $1,089,719 coded to the Price Waterhouse grouping and received by PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE I (C00107235). That join covers 8,351 contributions. The broader grouping across all committees is $6,975,521. These figures are not independent expenditures.
Did PricewaterhouseCoopers the firm donate $1,089,719?
No. The total is itemized individual contributions whose employer field grouped to PRICE WATERHOUSE, not a partnership treasury gift. 8,351 lines averaging about $131 do not identify unique accountants. This page reports the labeled join to C00107235 only. Occupation and employer labels are filer-entered. Cite FEC.gov for the underlying receipts.
What share of Price Waterhouse FEC money went to PwC PAC?
About 15.6% of the $6,975,521 Price Waterhouse total is in this join: $1,089,719 to PwC PAC. About $5,885,802 went to other committees. That percentage describes overlap of two FEC groupings, not a finding that the labeled entity directed the gifts.
Why are there 8,351 contributions in this PwC PAC cell?
The packet lists 8,351 itemized contribution lines totaling $1,089,719, about $130 per line. That is a receipt count, not a unique-donor count. Unitemized gifts and independent expenditures are not in this join. Use the C00107235 hub for other receipt types.

FEC.gov aggregates of itemized individual contributions grouped by employer/industry and recipient committee. Not independent expenditures.